0
Journal Contents   |    
Dysgenesis of the Proximal Femur (Coxa Vara) and Its Surgical Management
Harlan C. Amstutz; Philip D. WilsonJR.
View Disclosures and Other Information
NEW YORK, N. Y.
1962 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  1962; 44:1-24 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case
text A A A

Abstract

In dysgenesis of the proximal part of the femur there are three distinct groups: congenital short femur with coxa vara, congenital bowed femur with coxa vara, and congenital coxa vara.

Congenital shortening of the femur and congenital bowing of the femur are unique deformities and their classification as congenital aberrations seems obvious. The deformity of congenital coxa vara, however, is less distinctive and its differential diagnosis is therefore more difficult.

In congenital shortening of the femur with coxa vara there is severe shortening, and the most essential step in treatment is the fitting of a suitable prosthesis; surgical intervention, therefore, should be restricted to procedures which facilitate the use of a prosthetic device. Syme amputation has proved to be the most useful in this respect.

In congenital bowed femur with coxa vara, the shortening is less severe, but still marked. Either a prosthetic device or elevated shoe will be necessary. The coxa vara does not usually progress to a marked degree, and the indications for subtrochanteric osteotomy are as yet poorly defined. Because of the concomitant dysplasia of the hip, osteotomy may be contra-indicated.

In the treatment of congenital coxa vara there are three aims: (1) correction of deformity, (2) promotion of ossification of the cartilaginous neck, and (3) prevention of recurrence. In the majority of these children, the varus is rapidly progressive, and there is a wide and vertically oriented linear defect in the neck for which early radical osteotomy with bone transfixation of the femoral neck is indicated. In the minority of patients who have mild deformity or in whom the varus does not progress significantly, the indications for osteotomy are essentially functional and the procedure may be safely delayed for several years. In this mild form, correction does not have to be as radical as in the cases with severe and progressive varus.

Figures in this Article
    This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    03/07/2012
    KY - University of Louisville Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery
    03/07/2012
    CA - SOAR Medical Group
    03/06/2012
    RI - West Bay Orthopaedics and Neurosurgery, Inc.
    05/18/2012
    NY - SUNY-Downstate Medical Center