0
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics   |    
Review: Unreamed Intramedullary Nailing Reduces Reoperation Rates More Than External Fixation in Open Tibial Fracture Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Swiontkowski MF, Schemitsch EH. Treatment of open fractures of the shaft of the tibia. A systematic overview and meta‐analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001 Jan;83:62-8.
M Bhandari; G H Guyatt; M F Swiontkowski; E H Schemitsch
View Disclosures and Other Information
Sources of funding: No external funding.
For correspondence: Dr. M. Bhandari, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University Health Sciences Centre, Room 2C12, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada.

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  2001; 83:1281-1281 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case
text A A A
Question: In patients with open tibial shaft fractures, what is the effectiveness of external fixation, plating, and reamed or unreamed intramedullary nailing on rates of reoperation, nonunion, and infection?
Data sources: Studies were identified by searching Medline (1969 to 1998), SCISEARCH, and the Cochrane Library; by hand-searching major orthopaedic journals and proceedings; and by contacting experts in the field.
Study selection: Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials (RCTs or QRTs) comparing external fixation, plate fixation, and reamed or unreamed intramedullary nailing in patients with open fractures of the tibial diaphysis. The primary outcome was reoperation.
Data extraction: Data on patient characteristics, interventions, and outcomes were extracted. Study quality was assessed with respect to randomization procedures, blinding, follow-up, and analysis. An overall quality score was graded as a percentage.
Main results: 8 trials (4 RCTs and 4 QRTs) were included. The quality scores ranged from 18% to 71%. 1 QRT (56 patients) compared plate fixation with external fixation. The rates of reoperation were lower in the external-fixation group (6.7% vs. 50%, P < 0.01). The groups did not differ for nonunion or deep infection rates. 5 RCTs (396 patients) compared unreamed nailing with external fixation. Reoperation rates were lower in the unreamed-nailing group (P < 0.001) (table). The rates of nonunion and deep infection were also lower in the nailing group, but the differences did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.067 and P = 0.054, respectively) (table). 2 RCTs (132 patients) compared reamed nailing with unreamed nailing. The groups did not differ for rates of reoperation (P = 0.32), nonunion (P = 0.24), or deep infection (P = 0.98).
Conclusions: In patients with open tibial shaft fractures, the use of unreamed intramedullary nailing reduces reoperation rates more than does the use of external fixation. Reamed and unreamed nailing do not differ for the outcomes of reoperation, nonunion, or deep infection.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump:  Unreamed Intramedullary Nailing vs. External Fixation for Open Tibial Fractures (5 Trials)*
*RRR = relative risk reduction; NNT = number needed to treat; CI = confidence interval (calculated from data in article); NS = not significant. †Event rates are not weighted.
OutcomesEvent Rates†RRR (95% CI)NNT (CI)
Unreamed Intramedullary NailingExternal Fixation
Reoperation20%37%49% (31 to 63)6 (4 to 12)
Nonunion16%24%31% (—3 to 54)NS
Deep infection10%16%40% (—1 to 64)NS

Submit a comment

Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump:  Unreamed Intramedullary Nailing vs. External Fixation for Open Tibial Fractures (5 Trials)*
*RRR = relative risk reduction; NNT = number needed to treat; CI = confidence interval (calculated from data in article); NS = not significant. †Event rates are not weighted.
OutcomesEvent Rates†RRR (95% CI)NNT (CI)
Unreamed Intramedullary NailingExternal Fixation
Reoperation20%37%49% (31 to 63)6 (4 to 12)
Nonunion16%24%31% (—3 to 54)NS
Deep infection10%16%40% (—1 to 64)NS
Accreditation Statement
These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
CME Activities Associated with This Article
Submit a Comment
Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

* = Required Field
(if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
Example: John Doe




Related Articles
Related Cases
Related Content
Topic Collections
Related Audio and Videos
PubMed Articles
Treatment of open fractures of the shaft of the tibia.
The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume: Issue date- 2001 Jan
Clinical Trials
Readers of This Also Read...
jbjs jobs
02/16/2012
MA - Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
05/18/2012
NY - SUNY-Downstate Medical Center
03/07/2012
KY - University of Louisville Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery
03/22/2012
IL - Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush