0
Articles   |    
Proximal Tibial Varus Osteotomy Indications, Technique, and Five to Twenty-one-Year Results
Ren矋. Marti, MD, PhD; Ronald A.W. Verhagen, MD; Gino M.M.J. Kerkhoffs, MD; Thybout M. Moojen, MD
View Disclosures and Other Information
Investigation performed at Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Renç??. Marti, MD, PhD Ronald A.W. Verhagen, MD Gino M.M.J. Kerkhoffs, MD Thybout M. Moojen, MD Academic Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, G4-222, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Please address requests for reprints to R.K. Marti. E-mail address for R.K. Marti: orthopaedie@amc.uva.nl.
No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. No funds were received in support of this study.

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  2001; 83:164-164 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

Background: Although high tibial osteotomy has been proved effective for the treatment of painful osteoarthritis of the medial compartment of the knee, the role of proximal tibial varus osteotomy for the treatment of painful osteoarthritis of the lateral compartment still remains controversial.

Methods: From 1974 to 1993, we performed proximal tibial varus osteotomy for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the lateral compartment of the knee in thirty-six consecutive patients. The procedure consisted of a proximal lateral opening-wedge varus osteotomy of the tibia with use of corticocancellous bone grafts from the iliac crest. The valgus deformity was posttraumatic in twenty-three patients, followed a lateral meniscectomy in five, was due to overcorrection of a varus deformity in four, and was idiopathic in four. The preoperative valgus deformity averaged 11.6° (range, 4° to 22°).

Results: At a mean of eleven years (range, five to twenty-one years) after the operation, the clinical results for thirty-four of the thirty-six patients were analyzed. None of the patients had severe progression of the osteoarthritis after the osteotomy, and none had a meaningful loss in the range of motion of the knee joint. A superficial wound infection developed in one patient, and another patient had thrombophlebitis. Three patients (9%) had a transient palsy of the peroneal nerve. According to the system of Insall et al., the mean knee score was 84 points (range, 54 to 99 points). According to the knee score described by Lysholm and Gillquist, the subjective result was excellent in nine patients (26%), good in twenty-one (62%), fair in three (9%), and poor in one (3%).

Conclusions: We concluded that when the indications outlined in this study are followed and our opening-wedge technique is used, a proximal lateral opening-wedge varus osteotomy of the tibia is a good alternative for the treatment of isolated osteoarthritis of the lateral compartment of the knee. High accuracy in preoperative planning, based on a slight overcorrection, is important to prevent failure.

Figures in this Article
    Although valgus-producing high tibial osteotomy is widely accepted as yielding satisfactory long-term results in the treatment of medial osteoarthritis1-3, the indication for varus-producing proximal tibial osteotomy in patients with osteoarthritis involving the lateral compartment of the knee remains controversial4,5.
    In a normal knee, approximately 60% of the weight-bearing forces are transmitted through the medial compartment and 40%, through the lateral compartment. In a knee with unicompartmental arthritis, limb alignment is altered and subsequently more load is distributed to the affected compartment, causing further degenerative changes and angular deformity. This vicious cycle of progressive angular deformity and loss of articular cartilage may progress with time. Therefore, the aim of an osteotomy, valgus or varus-producing, is not only to relieve pain but also to redistribute the weight-bearing forces in order to facilitate healing and potentially to increase the life span of the knee joint. Additional goals are improved function and providing individuals who make heavy functional demands on the knee the opportunity to continue activities that could not be pursued after a total knee arthroplasty. Osteoarthritis of the lateral compartment with valgus deformity can be treated either with a supracondylar femoral varus osteotomy or a proximal tibial varus osteotomy. Coventry6 recommended a supracondylar femoral varus osteotomy if the valgus deformity is more than 12° or if the tilt of the tibiofemoral joint surface is more than 10°.
    Since most valgus deformities occur in the distal part of the femur, they should be corrected by means of a distal femoral osteotomy. However, if the valgus deformity is localized to the tibial side (which can occur especially after trauma or after lateral meniscectomy), it seems more logical to correct the deformity with a proximal tibial varus osteotomy. This report presents the indications and technique for proximal lateral opening-wedge varus osteotomy of the tibia for the treatment of valgus deformity of the knee as well as the results in a series followed for five to twenty-one years.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1:Slightly oblique lateral opening-wedge osteotomy of the proximal part of the tibia.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-A:Intraoperative radiograph showing a lateral opening-wedge osteotomy with the bone-spreader in situ.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-B:Schematic drawing showing opening of the osteotomy to make the two guide-wires parallel.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3:Postoperative radiograph after correction of valgus deformity by interposition of corticocancellous grafts. Note that no internal fixation was used in this case.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 4-A:Figs. 4-A, 4-B, and 4-C Case 29. Fig. 4-A Osteosynthesis after fracture of the lateral tibial plateau.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 4-B:Figs. 4-A, 4-B, and 4-C Case 29. Fig. 4-B Two months after varus osteotomy.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 4-C:Figs. 4-A, 4-B, and 4-C Case 29. Fig. 4-C Fifteen years after varus osteotomy.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 5-A:Figs. 5-A, 5-B and 5-C Case 21. Fig. 5-A Posttraumatic valgus deformity with impression of the lateral tibial plateau. The arrows indicate compression and distraction forces at the joint line due to the valgus deformity.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 5-B:Figs. 5-A, 5-B and 5-C Case 21. Fig. 5-B Radiograph made twenty years postoperatively. Because of the integrity of the medial cortex, it was possible to use only two screws to avoid graft subsidence.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 5-C:Figs. 5-A, 5-B and 5-C Case 21.Fig. 5-C Oblique radiograph made twenty years postoperatively. There is remodeling of the lateral tibial plateau and no progression of the osteoarthritis.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE I:  Data on the Thirty-Four Patients
    *The results were graded according to the score described by Lysholm and Gillquist8. The neutral zero method is used to describe the range of motion. For example, 120/0/5 means 120° of flexion, full extension, and 5° of hyperextension. The patient had a complication consisting of an infection (Case 1), a peroneal nerve palsy (Cases 8, 17, and 18), thrombophlebitis (Case 17), or arthritis requiring arthrodesis at sixty-five months (Case 32).
    CaseAge (yr)SideGenderDuration of Follow-up (mo)EtiologyFixationResult*Range of Motion (deg)
      Preop.    Postop.
        134LM144Posttraum.PlateExcel.120/5/0110/10/0
      253LF196Posttraum.PlateExcel.135/5/0135/5/0
      326RF  72Posttraum.NoneGood140/0/0140/0/0
      454LF257Posttraum.PlateExcel.  90/5/0  90/5/0
      526RM  86Posttraum.PlateGood130/5/0130/5/0
      638LM118Posttraum.PlateGood120/10/0110/5/0
      762LF  84Posttraum.PlateGood130/5/0130/0/0
        852LM140Prev. osteot.StapleGood120/5/0125/0/0
      935RF160Posttraum.ScrewsGood120/0/20105/5/0
    1022LF  72Posttraum.PlateGood140/0/0140/0/0
    1148RM189Posttraum.PlateGood120/0/0120/0/0
    1252RF168IdiopathicNoneGood          90/5/0  90/0/0
    1344RM100Posttraum.PlateExcel.130/0/0120/5/0
    1426LF185Posttraum.NoneGood130/0/15100/0/0
    1533RF  83Posttraum.PlateExcel.130/0/0130/0/0
    1651RF179Meniscect.PlateExcel.125/5/0125/5/0
      1758RF149Prev. osteot.PlateGood120/5/0110/0/0
      1827LF112IdiopathicNoneFair130/0/10130/5/0
    1917RF  92Posttraum.PlateGood130/0/15140/0/0
    2043LF148Posttraum.PlateFair130/0/5125/0/0
    2159RF186Posttraum.ScrewsExcel.130/5/0140/0/0
    2250RF176Posttraum.Ext. fix.Good145/0/5130/0/0
    2358LM144Posttraum.NoneGood120/5/0130/5/0
    2465RF181Posttraum.PlateGood130/5/0140/0/0
    2548RM152Meniscect.PlateGood120/0/0120/10/0
    2659LF175Posttraum.PlateExcel.120/0/0100/0/0
    2766RM100Posttraum.NoneExcel.130/5/0130/0/0
    2826LF164Prev. osteot.NoneGood130/0/0135/0/0
    2940LF195Posttraum.NoneGood130/0/5140/0/5
    3052LM  67Meniscect.StapleFair140/0/0140/0/0
    3138LF  72Meniscect.NoneGood140/0/0140/0/0
      3233LM  60Meniscect.PlatePoor120/0/5
    3327RM  72Prev. osteot.NoneGood130/0/0130/0/0
    3443RF120Posttraum.ScrewsGood140/0/0140/0/0
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE II:  Radiographic Assessment of Osteoarthritis and Mean Preoperative and Postoperative (Anatomic) Tibiofemoral Angles According to the Different Etiologies of the Valgus Deformity
    *According to the Ahlbück score, grade 0 = normal, grade 1 = minimal joint-space narrowing or irregularity of the joint space, grade 2 = moderate joint-space narrowing or irregularity with osteophytes, and grade 3 = severe joint-space narrowing with sclerosis and osteophytes. The numbers are given as the mean, with the range in parentheses.
    Posttraumatic (N = 23)Meniscectomy (N = 5)Previous Osteotomy (N = 4)Idiopathic (N = 2)Total (N = 34)
    Ahlbück9 score* (no. of patients)
      Preoperative
        Grade 1  921214
        Grade 21233018
        Grade 3  2000    2
      Postoperative
        Grade 1  721111
        Grade 21533122
        Grade 3  1000    1
    Mean tibiofemoral angle (deg)
      Preop.10.6 (4-21)  9.2 (8-10)18.3 (15-22)  9.5 (9-10)11.6 (4-22)
      Postop.    4.7 (-2-10)  6.8 (5-10)12.5 (12-13)2.5 (2-3)    5.8 (-2-13)
      Latest follow-up    4.0 (-5-10)5.8 (4-8)12.3 (12-13)2.5 (1-4)    5.1 (-5-13)
    From 1974 through 1993, an opening-wedge varus-producing osteotomy of the proximal part of the tibia was performed in thirty-six patients for the treatment of valgus deformity associated with osteoarthritis of the lateral compartment of the knee. The mean age at the time of the operation was forty-three years (range, seventeen to sixty-six years). The knee stability and range of motion as well as the patient's weight, prior operations, and whether a total knee replacement had been recommended were noted. The valgus deformity was posttraumatic in twenty-three patients, secondary to a lateral meniscectomy in five, due to overcorrection of a varus deformity in four, and idiopathic in four. All patients complained of knee pain originating from the lateral tibiofemoral compartment.
    Two patients died less than five years after the operation. One of these patients had an excellent subjective result at the latest follow-up evaluation at four years, and the other had a poor subjective result at two years. The clinical results for thirty-four patients, twenty-two female and twelve male, were evaluated at a mean of eleven years (range, five to twenty-one years) after the operation (Table ITable I). The function of the knee joint was assessed with use of the knee-rating score described by Insall et al.7 and the knee-scoring scale described by Lysholm and Gillquist8. In order to evaluate the degree of knee deformity, standing full-length radiographs of the lower extremities were made for all patients. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were analyzed according to the radiographic grade of osteoarthritis and the degree of valgus deformity9.

    Operative Technique

    Intraoperatively it is essential that the surgeon be able to view the whole leg from the iliac crest to the foot and that the limb be prepared to allow this. A tourniquet is used to create a bloodless field. With the knee flexed to 90°, an oblique osteotomy is performed through a short incision in the middle third of the fibula. Approximately 80% of the fibula is cut with an oscillating saw, and the osteotomy is then completed with an osteotome. Next, the leg is straightened to 20° of flexion. A 10 to 15-cm straight anterior midline incision is made, ending 1 cm lateral to the tibial crest. The fascia over the anterior tibial muscle is exposed, and the patellar tendon is identified. The fascia of the anterior tibial muscle is divided about 1 cm lateral to the tibial crest, to allow easy closure at the end of the procedure. With use of a sharp periosteal elevator, the anterior tibial muscle is dissected off the lateral aspect of the proximal part of the tibia. The popliteal neurovascular bundle is protected throughout the procedure with a blunt Hohmann retractor. Two thin Kirschner wires are passed manually beneath the menisci to identify the joint line. Two other Kirschner wires are placed proximal (subchondral) and distal (diaphyseal) to the osteotomy site to mark the correction angle. The plane of the lateral opening-wedge osteotomy starts about 4 cm distal to the lateral articular surface of the tibia; it is slightly oblique and lies just proximal to the tibial tuberosity (Fig. 1Fig. 1). The osteotomy ends 1 to 2 cm distal to the medial articular surface of the knee. The osteotomy is started with an oscillating saw. It is important not to complete the osteotomy with the saw, but rather to break the medial cortex by osteoclasis after perforating it several times with a small (2.5-mm) drill-bit or osteotome. A bone clamp is then used to secure the medial aspect of the osteotomy site so that it does not displace (Fig. 2-BFig. 2-B). An AO bone-spreader is used to open the osteotomy site to the degree necessary to make the two Kirschner wires parallel (Figs. 2-AFigs. 2-A and 2-B2-B). The alignment of the limb is viewed from the iliac crest to the foot to ensure that adequate correction has been achieved, and the stability is tested with the knee in varying degrees of flexion.
    The opening-wedge osteotomy is maintained with corticocancellous grafts obtained from the ipsilateral iliac crest. When the desired correction is achieved, three wedge-shaped tricorticocancellous grafts are harvested. The base of each graft corresponds with the length of the base of the opening wedge, resulting in cortical apposition of the grafts in the tibia both anteriorly and posteriorly. The cortex of the anteriorly placed graft is in direct contact with the anterior cortex of the tibia, and the cortex of the posteriorly placed graft is in direct contact with the posterior cortex. The intact medial cortex acts as a hinge and, together with the grafts, it provides intrinsic stability. Interposition of the three corticocancellous grafts may create sufficient stability for internal fixation to be unnecessary (Fig. 3Fig. 3). If internal fixation is necessary, one or two lag screws or a small buttress plate (a flattened semitubular plate) can be used to prevent graft subsidence.
    At the end of the procedure, the fascia over the anterior tibial muscle is resutured and a fasciotomy is performed to prevent a postoperative anterior compartment syndrome. Postoperative treatment consists of toe-touch weight-bearing with crutches. Radiographs are made at six weeks. Full weight-bearing is allowed when there is consolidation of theteotomy site, usually at eight weeks. If toe-touch weight-bearing is not possible or it is thought that the patient might not follow this protocol, the leg is placed on a continuous-passive-motion machine to maintain function and to reduce postoperative swelling before a cylinder cast is applied and partial (approximately 50%) weight-bearing with crutches is allowed. The cast remains in place for six weeks, after which active exercises are practiced with an increase to full weight-bearing as tolerated.
    The degree of valgus deformity (anatomical axial alignment), as measured before the operation on a standing radiograph, ranged from 4° to 22° and averaged 11.6°. Table IITable II shows the preoperative and postoperative tibiofemoral angles according to the different etiologies of the valgus deformity (after fracture, after meniscectomy, overcorrection of varus deformity, and idiopathic). During the follow-up period, the degree of correction remained stable (Table IITable II). Postoperatively, one patient had a superficial wound infection, and three patients (9%) had an apraxia of the peroneal nerve with transient palsy. All three palsies resolved within one year after the operation. One patient had thrombophlebitis. No deep infection developed, and there were no nonunions.
    The range of motion of the knee was assessed preoperatively, three months postoperatively, and at the time of the latest follow-up. No knee had a substantial change in the range of flexion or extension (Table ITable I). At the time of follow-up, five knees had moderate instability. None had progression of the grade of osteoarthritis after the operative procedure (Table IITable II).
    At the time of follow-up, the knee score according to the system of Insall et al.7 ranged from 54 to 99 points (mean, 84 points). The subjective result (according to the score described by Lysholm and Guillquist8) was excellent in nine patients (26%), good in twenty-one (62%), fair in three (9%), and poor in one patient (3%) (Table ITable I). The patient with a poor result underwent an arthrodesis of the knee because of severe, disabling pain sixty-five months after the varus osteotomy.
    In a normal knee, approximately two-thirds of the weight-bearing forces are transmitted through the medial compartment. In a knee with unicompartmental osteoarthritis and deformity, the altered limb alignment redistributes even more load to the affected compartment. McKellop et al. found that varus or valgus angulation of 20° in proximal tibial fractures doubled contact pressures10. In addition, the associated increase in angular deformity may affect the ligamentous stability of the knee.
    Coventry stated that an osteotomy can be successfully performed at the level of the proximal part of the tibia only in knees with limited valgus deformity6. He suggested that larger deformities should be treated with a distal femoral osteotomy. For the most part we agree with his statements since most valgus deformities are indeed localized at the level of the distal part of the femur (dysplasia of the lateral femoral condyle) and ideally should be corrected by a distal femoral osteotomy. For example, during the time-period of this study (eighteen years), we performed 126 distal femoral osteotomies and only thirty-six proximal tibial varus osteotomies for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the lateral compartment of the knee. However, when genu valgum is due to a deformity of the proximal part of the tibia in a limb with normally aligned femoral condyles, proximal tibial varus osteotomy is the most logical option11 (Figs. 4-AFigs. 4-A, 4-B4-B, and 4-C4-C). The consequence of a wrong localization of the osteotomy is tilt of the tibiofemoral joint line. One should be aware that an angular correction of more than 15° at the tibial level may result in excessive tibial obliquity, predispose the knee to mediolateral laxity, and compromise the overall result of the operation. If the deformity is equally distributed between the femur and the tibia, a double osteotomy can be considered. Over the last eighteen years, we have performed only eight double osteotomies.
    The advantages of the proximal lateral opening-wedge osteotomy of the tibia are that it provides a familiar exposure and instability can be corrected by tightening of ligamentous and muscular stabilizers as in the correction of medial instability12. This effect can be tested during the operation by imitating loading conditions with the AO bone-spreader in situ. The medial ligamentous structures are not weakened as they are in a resection-type (closing-wedge) osteotomy. Avoiding dissection around the pes anserinus decreases residual medial symptoms. Disadvantages include movement of the patella slightly more distally and a greater risk of nonunion than is associated with a closing-wedge osteotomy. However, there were no nonunions in our group of patients.
    The complications in our series included three transient peroneal nerve palsies. This 9% rate is comparable with that reported in the literature13-17. Because the fibula is tethered to the tibia, no change in tibial angulation can be effected without operative treatment of the fibula or the tibiofibular joint. In this series, all fibular osteotomies were performed at the midshaft level. Although osteotomies at the junction of the proximal and middle thirds of the fibula have been reported, it has recently been recommended that the fibular osteotomy not be performed between 7 and 15 cm from the fibular head18. The reason for this is that the nerve supply to the extensor hallucis longus is at high risk for injury during fibular osteotomy because of the proximity of the motor branches of the deep peroneal nerve to the osteotomy site.
    The late results of this proximal tibial varus osteotomy in our study were better than those previously described in the literature4,5 (Figs. 5-AFigs. 5-A, 5-B5-B, and 5-C5-C). We do not think that this operation precludes or complicates a secondary procedure such as knee arthrodesis or unicompartmental, or total, knee arthroplasty. However, different opinions about the difficulty of total knee arthroplasty after proximal tibial osteotomy have been expressed in the literature19-21.
    In our opinion, there is no age limit for varus osteotomy just as is the case with valgus osteotomy22. It has been our experience that, although subluxation of the plateau is not a contraindication, a relative contraindication is limitation of flexion to less than 80° and loss of extension of more than 20°.
    Careful preoperative planning is essential to determine the axial alignment and the amount of correction that is required. When there are osseous defects or attenuated ligaments (as are seen in posttraumatic cases), the use of radiographs made with the patient standing can lead to overcorrection23,24. On the basis of Coventry's study, an anatomical axial alignment of 0° seems to be the most desirable goal6. Because calculation of the angle of correction is limited, especially in post-traumatic cases, it is essential to test the functional stability of the knee during the operation by imitating loading conditions while the leg is viewed from the iliac crest to the foot.
    With use of the right indications and technique, good long-term results can be obtained with proximal lateral opening-wedge varus osteotomy of the tibia. In our view, correction of the deformity is the first step in operative treatment of angular deformities around the knee.
    Billings A; Scott DF; Camargo MP; and Hofmann AA: High tibial osteotomy with a calibrated osteotomy guide, rigid internal fixation, and early motion. Long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2000.82: 70-9, 8270  2000  [PubMed]
     
    Coventry MB: Current concepts review. Upper tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1985.67: 1136-40, 671136  1985  [PubMed]
     
    Rudan JF, and Simurda MA: Valgus high tibial osteotomy. A long-term follow-up study. Clin Orthop,1991.268: 157-60, 268157  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Harding ML: A fresh appraisal of tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee. Clin Orthop,1976.114: 223-34, 114223  1976  [PubMed]
     
    Healy WL; Anglen JO; Wasilewski SA; and Krackow KA: Distal femoral varus osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1988.70: 102-9, 70102  1988  [PubMed]
     
    Coventry MB: Proximal tibial varus osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the lateral compartment of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1987.69: 32-8, 6932  1987  [PubMed]
     
    Insall JN; Dorr LD; Scott RD; and Scott WN: Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop,1989.248: 13-4, 24813  1989  [PubMed]
     
    Lysholm J, and Gillquist J: Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med,1982.10: 150-4, 10150  1982  [PubMed]
     
    Ahlbück S: Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh),1968.Suppl 277: 7-72, Suppl 2777  1968 
     
    McKellop HA; Llinas A; and Sarmiento A: Effects of tibial malalignment on the knee and ankle. Orthop Clin North Am,1994.25: 415-23, 25415  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Phillips MJ, and Krackow KA: High tibial osteotomy and distal femoral osteotomy for valgus or varus deformity around the knee. Instr Course Lect,1998.47: 429-36, 47429  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Hernigou P; Medevielle D; Debeyre J; and Goutallier D: Proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis with varus deformity. A ten to thirteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1987.69: 332-54, 69332  1987  [PubMed]
     
    Bettin D; Karbowski A; Schwering L; and Matthiass HH: Time-dependent clinical and roentgenographical results of Coventry high tibial valgisation osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,1998.117: 53-7, 11753  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Giagounidis EM, and Sell S: High tibial osteotomy: factors influencing the duration of satisfactory function. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,1999.119: 445-9, 119445  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Jackson JP, and Waugh W: The technique and complications of upper tibial osteotomy. A review of 226 operations. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1974.56: 236-45, 56236  1974  [PubMed]
     
    Matthews LS; Goldstein SA; Malvitz TA; Katz BP; and Kaufer H: Proximal tibial osteotomy. Factors that influence the duration of satisfactory function. Clin Orthop,1988.229: 193-200, 229193  1988  [PubMed]
     
    Takahashi T; Wada Y; Tanaka M; Iwagawa M; Ikeuchi M; Hirose D; and Yamamoto H: Dome-shaped proximal tibial osteotomy using percutaneous drilling for osteoarthritis of the knee. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2000.120: 32-7, 12032  2000  [PubMed]
     
    Kirgis A, and Albrecht S: Palsy of the deep peroneal nerve after proximal tibial osteotomy. An anatomical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1992.74: 1180-5, 741180  1992  [PubMed]
     
    Jackson M; Sarangi PP; and Newman JH: Revision total knee arthroplasty. Comparison of outcome following primary proximal tibial osteotomy or unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty.,1994.9: 539-42, 9539  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Staeheli JW; Cass JR; and Morrey BF: Condylar total knee arthroplasty after failed proximal tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1987.69: 28-31, 6928  1987  [PubMed]
     
    Toksvig-Larsen S; Magyar G; Õ®sten I, Ryd L; and Lindstrand A: Fixation of the tibial component of total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy. A matched radiostereometric study. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1998.80: 295-7, 80295  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Grelsamer RP: Current concepts review. Unicompartmental osteoarthrosis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1995.77: 278-92, 77278  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Dugdale TW; Noyes FR; and Styer D: Preoperative planning for high tibial osteotomy. The effect of lateral tibiofemoral separation and tibiofemoral length. Clin Orthop,1992.274: 248-64, 274248  1992  [PubMed]
     
    Ogata K; Yoshii I; Kawamura H; Miura HArizono T; and Sugioka Y: Standing radiographs cannot determine the correction in high tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1991.73: 927-31, 73927  1991  [PubMed]
     

    Submit a comment

    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1:Slightly oblique lateral opening-wedge osteotomy of the proximal part of the tibia.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-A:Intraoperative radiograph showing a lateral opening-wedge osteotomy with the bone-spreader in situ.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-B:Schematic drawing showing opening of the osteotomy to make the two guide-wires parallel.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3:Postoperative radiograph after correction of valgus deformity by interposition of corticocancellous grafts. Note that no internal fixation was used in this case.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 4-A:Figs. 4-A, 4-B, and 4-C Case 29. Fig. 4-A Osteosynthesis after fracture of the lateral tibial plateau.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 4-B:Figs. 4-A, 4-B, and 4-C Case 29. Fig. 4-B Two months after varus osteotomy.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 4-C:Figs. 4-A, 4-B, and 4-C Case 29. Fig. 4-C Fifteen years after varus osteotomy.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 5-A:Figs. 5-A, 5-B and 5-C Case 21. Fig. 5-A Posttraumatic valgus deformity with impression of the lateral tibial plateau. The arrows indicate compression and distraction forces at the joint line due to the valgus deformity.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 5-B:Figs. 5-A, 5-B and 5-C Case 21. Fig. 5-B Radiograph made twenty years postoperatively. Because of the integrity of the medial cortex, it was possible to use only two screws to avoid graft subsidence.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 5-C:Figs. 5-A, 5-B and 5-C Case 21.Fig. 5-C Oblique radiograph made twenty years postoperatively. There is remodeling of the lateral tibial plateau and no progression of the osteoarthritis.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE I:  Data on the Thirty-Four Patients
    *The results were graded according to the score described by Lysholm and Gillquist8. The neutral zero method is used to describe the range of motion. For example, 120/0/5 means 120° of flexion, full extension, and 5° of hyperextension. The patient had a complication consisting of an infection (Case 1), a peroneal nerve palsy (Cases 8, 17, and 18), thrombophlebitis (Case 17), or arthritis requiring arthrodesis at sixty-five months (Case 32).
    CaseAge (yr)SideGenderDuration of Follow-up (mo)EtiologyFixationResult*Range of Motion (deg)
      Preop.    Postop.
        134LM144Posttraum.PlateExcel.120/5/0110/10/0
      253LF196Posttraum.PlateExcel.135/5/0135/5/0
      326RF  72Posttraum.NoneGood140/0/0140/0/0
      454LF257Posttraum.PlateExcel.  90/5/0  90/5/0
      526RM  86Posttraum.PlateGood130/5/0130/5/0
      638LM118Posttraum.PlateGood120/10/0110/5/0
      762LF  84Posttraum.PlateGood130/5/0130/0/0
        852LM140Prev. osteot.StapleGood120/5/0125/0/0
      935RF160Posttraum.ScrewsGood120/0/20105/5/0
    1022LF  72Posttraum.PlateGood140/0/0140/0/0
    1148RM189Posttraum.PlateGood120/0/0120/0/0
    1252RF168IdiopathicNoneGood          90/5/0  90/0/0
    1344RM100Posttraum.PlateExcel.130/0/0120/5/0
    1426LF185Posttraum.NoneGood130/0/15100/0/0
    1533RF  83Posttraum.PlateExcel.130/0/0130/0/0
    1651RF179Meniscect.PlateExcel.125/5/0125/5/0
      1758RF149Prev. osteot.PlateGood120/5/0110/0/0
      1827LF112IdiopathicNoneFair130/0/10130/5/0
    1917RF  92Posttraum.PlateGood130/0/15140/0/0
    2043LF148Posttraum.PlateFair130/0/5125/0/0
    2159RF186Posttraum.ScrewsExcel.130/5/0140/0/0
    2250RF176Posttraum.Ext. fix.Good145/0/5130/0/0
    2358LM144Posttraum.NoneGood120/5/0130/5/0
    2465RF181Posttraum.PlateGood130/5/0140/0/0
    2548RM152Meniscect.PlateGood120/0/0120/10/0
    2659LF175Posttraum.PlateExcel.120/0/0100/0/0
    2766RM100Posttraum.NoneExcel.130/5/0130/0/0
    2826LF164Prev. osteot.NoneGood130/0/0135/0/0
    2940LF195Posttraum.NoneGood130/0/5140/0/5
    3052LM  67Meniscect.StapleFair140/0/0140/0/0
    3138LF  72Meniscect.NoneGood140/0/0140/0/0
      3233LM  60Meniscect.PlatePoor120/0/5
    3327RM  72Prev. osteot.NoneGood130/0/0130/0/0
    3443RF120Posttraum.ScrewsGood140/0/0140/0/0
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE II:  Radiographic Assessment of Osteoarthritis and Mean Preoperative and Postoperative (Anatomic) Tibiofemoral Angles According to the Different Etiologies of the Valgus Deformity
    *According to the Ahlbück score, grade 0 = normal, grade 1 = minimal joint-space narrowing or irregularity of the joint space, grade 2 = moderate joint-space narrowing or irregularity with osteophytes, and grade 3 = severe joint-space narrowing with sclerosis and osteophytes. The numbers are given as the mean, with the range in parentheses.
    Posttraumatic (N = 23)Meniscectomy (N = 5)Previous Osteotomy (N = 4)Idiopathic (N = 2)Total (N = 34)
    Ahlbück9 score* (no. of patients)
      Preoperative
        Grade 1  921214
        Grade 21233018
        Grade 3  2000    2
      Postoperative
        Grade 1  721111
        Grade 21533122
        Grade 3  1000    1
    Mean tibiofemoral angle (deg)
      Preop.10.6 (4-21)  9.2 (8-10)18.3 (15-22)  9.5 (9-10)11.6 (4-22)
      Postop.    4.7 (-2-10)  6.8 (5-10)12.5 (12-13)2.5 (2-3)    5.8 (-2-13)
      Latest follow-up    4.0 (-5-10)5.8 (4-8)12.3 (12-13)2.5 (1-4)    5.1 (-5-13)
    Billings A; Scott DF; Camargo MP; and Hofmann AA: High tibial osteotomy with a calibrated osteotomy guide, rigid internal fixation, and early motion. Long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2000.82: 70-9, 8270  2000  [PubMed]
     
    Coventry MB: Current concepts review. Upper tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1985.67: 1136-40, 671136  1985  [PubMed]
     
    Rudan JF, and Simurda MA: Valgus high tibial osteotomy. A long-term follow-up study. Clin Orthop,1991.268: 157-60, 268157  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Harding ML: A fresh appraisal of tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee. Clin Orthop,1976.114: 223-34, 114223  1976  [PubMed]
     
    Healy WL; Anglen JO; Wasilewski SA; and Krackow KA: Distal femoral varus osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1988.70: 102-9, 70102  1988  [PubMed]
     
    Coventry MB: Proximal tibial varus osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the lateral compartment of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1987.69: 32-8, 6932  1987  [PubMed]
     
    Insall JN; Dorr LD; Scott RD; and Scott WN: Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop,1989.248: 13-4, 24813  1989  [PubMed]
     
    Lysholm J, and Gillquist J: Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med,1982.10: 150-4, 10150  1982  [PubMed]
     
    Ahlbück S: Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh),1968.Suppl 277: 7-72, Suppl 2777  1968 
     
    McKellop HA; Llinas A; and Sarmiento A: Effects of tibial malalignment on the knee and ankle. Orthop Clin North Am,1994.25: 415-23, 25415  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Phillips MJ, and Krackow KA: High tibial osteotomy and distal femoral osteotomy for valgus or varus deformity around the knee. Instr Course Lect,1998.47: 429-36, 47429  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Hernigou P; Medevielle D; Debeyre J; and Goutallier D: Proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis with varus deformity. A ten to thirteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1987.69: 332-54, 69332  1987  [PubMed]
     
    Bettin D; Karbowski A; Schwering L; and Matthiass HH: Time-dependent clinical and roentgenographical results of Coventry high tibial valgisation osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,1998.117: 53-7, 11753  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Giagounidis EM, and Sell S: High tibial osteotomy: factors influencing the duration of satisfactory function. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,1999.119: 445-9, 119445  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Jackson JP, and Waugh W: The technique and complications of upper tibial osteotomy. A review of 226 operations. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1974.56: 236-45, 56236  1974  [PubMed]
     
    Matthews LS; Goldstein SA; Malvitz TA; Katz BP; and Kaufer H: Proximal tibial osteotomy. Factors that influence the duration of satisfactory function. Clin Orthop,1988.229: 193-200, 229193  1988  [PubMed]
     
    Takahashi T; Wada Y; Tanaka M; Iwagawa M; Ikeuchi M; Hirose D; and Yamamoto H: Dome-shaped proximal tibial osteotomy using percutaneous drilling for osteoarthritis of the knee. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2000.120: 32-7, 12032  2000  [PubMed]
     
    Kirgis A, and Albrecht S: Palsy of the deep peroneal nerve after proximal tibial osteotomy. An anatomical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1992.74: 1180-5, 741180  1992  [PubMed]
     
    Jackson M; Sarangi PP; and Newman JH: Revision total knee arthroplasty. Comparison of outcome following primary proximal tibial osteotomy or unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty.,1994.9: 539-42, 9539  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Staeheli JW; Cass JR; and Morrey BF: Condylar total knee arthroplasty after failed proximal tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1987.69: 28-31, 6928  1987  [PubMed]
     
    Toksvig-Larsen S; Magyar G; Õ®sten I, Ryd L; and Lindstrand A: Fixation of the tibial component of total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy. A matched radiostereometric study. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1998.80: 295-7, 80295  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Grelsamer RP: Current concepts review. Unicompartmental osteoarthrosis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1995.77: 278-92, 77278  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Dugdale TW; Noyes FR; and Styer D: Preoperative planning for high tibial osteotomy. The effect of lateral tibiofemoral separation and tibiofemoral length. Clin Orthop,1992.274: 248-64, 274248  1992  [PubMed]
     
    Ogata K; Yoshii I; Kawamura H; Miura HArizono T; and Sugioka Y: Standing radiographs cannot determine the correction in high tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1991.73: 927-31, 73927  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    High tibial osteotomy with a dynamic axial fixator: precision in achieving alignment.
    The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume: Issue date- 2011 Jul
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    01/04/2012
    LA - LSU Health Shreveport
    01/04/2012
    PA - Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center - Dept. of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation
    05/18/2012
    NH - Concord Orthopaedics