0
Articles   |    
Surgical Repair of Chronic Rotator Cuff Tears A Prospective Long-Term Study
Robert H. Cofield, MD; Javad Parvizi, MD, FRCS; Pierre J. Hoffmeyer, MD; William L. Lanzer, MD; Duane M. Ilstrup, MS; Charles M. Rowland, MS
View Disclosures and Other Information
Investigation performed at the Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota
Robert H. Cofield, MD
Javad Parvizi, MD, FRCS
Duane M. Ilstrup, MS
Charles M. Rowland, MS
Departments of Orthopedic Surgery (R.H.C. and J.P.) and Biostatistics (D.M.I. and C.M.R.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street S.W., Rochester, MN 55905
Pierre J. Hoffmeyer, MD
Hopitaux Universitaires de Geneve, Rue Micheli-du-Crest 24, CH-1211 Geneve 14, Switzerland
William L. Lanzer, MD
550 16th Avenue, Suite 300A, Seattle, WA 98122
No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. No funds were received in support of this study.

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  2001; 83:71-71 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

Background: Rotator cuff disease or injury is one of the most frequently seen orthopaedic conditions, and surgical repair of rotator cuff tears is a common procedure. A prospective analysis of the operation, with consistent assessment of patient characteristics, variables associated with the rotator cuff tear and repair techniques, and outcome factors, was performed.

Methods: One hundred and five shoulders with a chronic rotator cuff tear underwent open surgical repair and acromioplasty between 1975 and 1983. The patients were followed for an average of 13.4 years (range, two to twenty-two years). There were sixteen small tears, forty medium tears, thirty-eight large tears, and eleven massive tears. The tears were repaired directly (seventy-two tears), by V-Y plasty (twelve), by tendon transposition (twenty), or by reinforcement with a fascia lata graft (one). The long head of the biceps had been previously torn in eleven shoulders and was tenodesed in three other shoulders. In fifty-six shoulders, the distal part of the clavicle was excised for treatment of degenerative arthritic changes, often associated with osteophyte formation.

Results: Satisfactory pain relief was obtained in ninety-six shoulders (p < 0.0001). There was significant improvement in active abduction (p < 0.001) and external rotation (p < 0.007) as well as in strength in these directions of movement (p < 0.03 and p < 0.002, respectively). At the latest follow-up evaluation, the result was rated as excellent for sixty-eight shoulders, satisfactory for sixteen, and unsatisfactory for twenty-one. Tear size was the most important determinant of outcome with regard to active motion, strength, rating of the result, patient satisfaction, and need for a reoperation. Older age, less preoperative active motion, preoperative weakness, distal clavicular excision, and a transposition repair technique were all associated with larger tear size. There were eight reoperations; five were for rerepair of a persistent or recurrent rotator cuff tear.

Conclusions: Standard tendon repair techniques combined with anterior acromioplasty, postoperative limb protection, and monitored physiotherapy can produce consistent and lasting pain relief and improvement in range of motion. Improving the results of this procedure will depend upon the development of new techniques to address the active motion and strength deficiencies following repair of massive rotator cuff tears.

Figures in this Article
    There have been numerous reports on rotator cuff tears and the outcome of surgical repair1-12as well as extensive reports on a variety of surgical repair methods13-18. More recently, arthroscopic repair methods have been developed, with the promise of more rapid patient recovery13,17,19,20. Most of these reports are retrospective reviews with a mid-range duration of follow-up1,3-5,8,12,21. We thought that it would be valuable to report on a prospective long-term assessment of patients who underwent open surgical repair of a full-thickness chronic tear of the rotator cuff. Because of the consistent methods used for collection of data on patient characteristics, pathological findings at the operation, method of operative treatment, and follow-up, a vigorous statistical analysis could be accomplished to assess the relationships of these various parameters with the outcome. It is hoped that such a complete evaluation of this very common procedure will provide an understandable set of data with which new methods of treatment can be compared.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1:Graph showing the distribution of follow-up times.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2:Graph showing the preoperative and postoperative ranges of abduction and external rotation for each tear size.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE I:  Characteristics of the Rotator Cuff Tears
    Number (%)
    Size
      Small (<1 cm)16 (15)
      Medium (1 to <3 cm)40 (38)
      Large (3 to <5 cm)38 (36)
      Massive (5 cm)11 (10)
    Location
      Supraspinatus58 (55)
      Supraspinatus and infraspinatus33 (31)
      Supraspinatus and subscapularis4 (4)
      Supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and subscapularis3 (3)
      Subscapularis3 (3)
      Interval tear3 (3)
      Infraspinatus1 (1)
    Shape
      Longitudinal14 (13)
      Transverse17 (16)
      Longitudinal and transverse37 (35)
      Triangular23 (22)
      Trapezoidal14 (13)
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE II:  Associations Between Preoperative and Operative Factors and the Outcomes of Rotator Cuff Repair*
    *The table shows the factors that had significant association with outcome parameters. A plus sign indicates that the factor had a positive effect on the outcome parameter or parameters, and a minus sign indicates that the factor had a negative effect.
    Preoperative and Operative FactorsP Value
    Pain ReliefActive MotionStrengthResult RatingPatient SatisfactionReoperation
    Age (-)0.0050.04
    Female gender (-)0.040.030.01
    Preoperative active motion (+)0.0040.030.05
    Preoperative strength (+)0.0001
    Tear size (-)0.00010.00060.00020.0030.003
    Distal clavicular excision (-)0.03
    Transposition repair method (-)0.050.02

    Study Group

    One hundred and five consecutive shoulders in ninety-seven patients underwent surgical repair of a chronic rotator cuff tear by the senior author (R.H.C.) between January 1, 1975, and December 31, 1983. Eight patients had staged repairs of a bilateral rotator cuff tear. Institutional Review Board approval for this study and informed consent of all patients to participate in the study were obtained. The criteria for inclusion in the study were a visit by and an examination of the patient at a minimum of two years following the operation and additional patient contact by means of a visit, questionnaire, or telephone interview. The time between the operation and the examination averaged 4.2 years (range, two to seventeen years), and that between the operation and the most recent patient contact by telephone or questionnaire averaged 13.4 years (range, two to twenty-two years). No patient was lost to follow-up; however, sixteen patients died during the surveillance period, with the time to death averaging 6.5 years (range, two to fifteen years) (Fig. 1Fig. 1).
    Patient age at the time of the operation averaged fifty-eight years (range, thirty-eight to seventy-five years). The repairs were performed on seventy-two shoulders in men and thirty-three in women and in sixty-five right shoulders and forty left shoulders. Only four patients were left-hand-dominant. On the basis of the history, the tear was found to be associated with a varying degree of trauma in sixty-two shoulders. Twenty-five injuries were work-related. Occupational activities varied, with thirty-four patients involved in heavy-duty work; thirty-two, in light-duty work; and seventeen, in office work. The remaining fourteen patients were retired. Thirty-two patients were regularly involved in some form of sports activity.
    The surgery was performed to reduce pain and to improve the ability to carry out functional activities; the primary indication for surgical repair typically was pain that was unresponsive to nonoperative treatment. With use of a 5-point scale, pain was classified as none, slight, occasionally moderate with vigorous activities, moderate, or severe. Eighty-six shoulders were reported to be severely painful by the patients, fifteen were moderately painful, and four were not painful. The average duration of symptoms prior to surgery was thirty months (range, one to 180 months). Ninety-five shoulders had had previous treatment with analgesic or anti-inflammatory medications. Eighty-two shoulders had been treated with monitored physiotherapy, and sixty-three shoulders had received at least one injection (average, two; range, one to fifteen injections) of cortisone into the subacromial bursa. Preoperatively, active abduction averaged 128° (range, 0° to 180°), external rotation averaged 60° (range, 0° to 90°), and median internal rotation was to the eleventh thoracic level (range, the trochanter to the fourth thoracic level). Strength was measured by manual muscle-testing according to the grading system of the Medical Research Council, in which grade 5 was considered normal; grade 4, good; grade 3, fair; and grades 2, 1, and 0, poor. Strength in abduction was normal in forty-one shoulders, good in thirty-three, fair in twenty-eight, and poor in three. Strength in flexion was normal in sixty shoulders, good in thirty-three, and fair in twelve. Strength in external rotation was normal in forty-five shoulders, good in twenty-nine, fair in twenty-nine, and poor in two. Strength in internal rotation was normal in forty-six shoulders, good in thirty-five, fair in twenty-one, and poor in three.
    Radiographs made preoperatively included anteroposterior views with the shoulder in internal and external rotation as well as an axillary view. Preoperatively there was mild glenohumeral arthritis in three shoulders. There was cyst formation in the greater tuberosity in nine shoulders and sclerosis or rarefaction in the greater tuberosity in thirty-five. Acromial changes included spurring in eighteen shoulders, sclerosis in eighteen, and a concave appearance of the undersurface in twenty-five. The acromiohumeral distance was less than 3 mm in ten shoulders, between 4 and 6 mm in five shoulders, and greater than 7 mm in fifty-three shoulders in which the measurement could be made. Shoulder arthrograms had been made for seventy-eight shoulders, and a full-thickness tear of the rotator cuff was confirmed in seventy-six of them. The other two shoulders, which had a normal arthrographic appearance, were found to have a full-thickness tear intraoperatively.
    The undersurface of the anterior portion of the acromion appeared normal in forty-five shoulders, had wear with sclerosis in eighteen, had a concave or hooked shape in twenty-five, and had anteromedial spurring or osteophyte formation in seventeen. Tear size was evaluated by measuring the maximum length or diameter of the full-thickness tendon tear after limited d衲idement of mucoid or frayed tendon edges3-5,13,22. The tears were categorized into five shapes (Table ITable I). The biceps tendon appeared normal in sixty-one shoulders, had some degree of wear in fifteen, appeared inflamed in twelve, was torn in eleven, was dislocated in three, and appeared markedly hypertrophic in three. Biceps tearing or dislocation occurred with a higher frequency in the shoulders with the larger tears (p = 0.01).

    Operative Procedure and Postoperative Care

    The surgical approach was anterosuperior in 101 shoulders and anteromedial in four. The procedure of tendon repair varied according to the size and shape of the tendon tear. The repair was tendon-to-tendon only following d衲idement in fourteen shoulders, was tendon-to-bone only in sixteen shoulders, and was both tendon-to-tendon and tendon-to-bone in an anatomically normal position in forty-two shoulders. A V-Y plasty was performed in twelve shoulders. Subscapularis tendon transposition upward was a component of the repair in fifteen shoulders, subscapularis and infraspinatus tendon transposition upward was carried out in five shoulders, and reinforcement of the tendon repair with a fascia lata graft was done in one shoulder. All repairs were performed with the arm in 15° to 20° of abduction. Anterior-inferior acromioplasty was always performed. The distal 1 cm of the clavicle was excised in fifty-six shoulders to remove hypertrophic changes on the undersurface of the acromioclavicular joint that compromised the supraspinatus outlet or to treat severe acromioclavicular arthritis. Biceps tenodesis was performed in the three shoulders with dislocation of the biceps tendon.
    The type of external support following surgery was determined by visual analysis of the tension on the repaired tendon at the time of surgery. A shoulder immobilizer was used for forty-four shoulders, a low-angled (30°) humeral abduction splint was used for fifty-seven shoulders to relieve slight tension on a tendon repair in the posterior or posterosuperior part of the shoulder, and a low-angled shoulder spica cast was used for four shoulders with an extensive tendon tear in patients with a thin body habitus. External support was continued for four to six weeks.
    When the patient was treated with an immobilizer or splint, a passive range-of-motion program for elevation and external rotation was begun on the second postoperative day and was continued for four to six weeks. At four to six weeks, an active-assisted motion program and gentle isometric strengthening were started. At three months, strengthening and stretching with use of an elastic strap were begun to eliminate any residual motion deficits.

    Rating of the Results

    The results were rated according to criteria defined by Neer23 and with use of a 5-point pain-rating scale. Patients with no pain, active abduction of 145° or greater, and external rotation of 55° or greater were rated as having an excellent result. Those with no pain or slight or occasionally moderate pain, active abduction between 100° and 144°, and external rotation between 30° and 54° were rated as having a satisfactory result. When the above criteria were not met, the result was rated as unsatisfactory.

    Statistical Analysis

    The comparison of ordinal or continuous variables among groups was performed with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test when two groups were compared and with the Kruskal-Wallis test when more than two groups were compared. Changes in ordinal or continuous variables were assessed with use of the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Association of pairs of ordinal or continuous variables was estimated with the Spearman rank correlation coefficient, denoted by "r" in the Results section. Changes in binary outcomes were assessed with use of the McNemar test for matched pairs. The method of Kaplan and Meier was used to estimate survival free of a reoperation. The log-rank test was used to compare survival between groups. A significance level of 0.05 was used for all tests.

    Pain

    Surgical repair was successful in reducing or eliminating pain (p < 0.0001). At the time of the latest follow-up, fifty-five shoulders were not painful, thirty-one were slightly painful, ten were occasionally moderately painful with unusually vigorous activities, eight were moderately painful, and one was severely painful. Eight of the nine moderately or severely painful shoulders underwent revision surgery, as described below. Night pain was also markedly decreased: it was present in ninety shoulders preoperatively and in twenty-one shoulders postoperatively (p < 0.0001). Men had somewhat less postoperative pain than women (p < 0.04), with the median pain rating being none for men and slight for women (Table IITable II). Although there was a trend for a higher degree of postoperative pain with a larger tear size, this association was not significant (p = 0.08).

    Range of Motion

    There was improvement in active abduction (p < 0.001) and external rotation (p < 0.007). Active abduction improved an average of 26°, to 154° (range, 20° to 180°). Postoperative active abduction was 0° to 59° in four shoulders, 60° to 89° in four shoulders, 90° to 119° in eight shoulders, 120° to 149° in twelve shoulders, and 150° or greater in seventy-seven shoulders. External rotation with the arm at the side improved an average of 9°, to 69° (range, 20° to 90°). Median internal rotation improved one spinal level, from the eleventh to the tenth thoracic vertebra.
    Older age was associated with less postoperative active abduction (p = 0.005, r = -0.33), external rotation (p = 0.004, r = -0.28), and internal rotation (p = 0.04, r = -0.41) (Table IITable II). Postoperative active abduction was slightly better in men (p = 0.03), who had median abduction of 173° compared with 165° in women. A greater postoperative range of motion correlated with a better preoperative range of motion for abduction (p = 0.004, r = 0.28), external rotation (p = 0.04, r = 0.20), and internal rotation (p = 0.04, r = 0.28). The size of the rotator cuff tear correlated inversely with postoperative motion (Fig. 2Fig. 2), as shoulders with a large or massive tear had lesser ranges of active abduction (p = 0.0001), external rotation (p = 0.002), and internal rotation (p = 0.0009). The repair method also influenced the final range of motion, as the patients who had had subscapularis and infraspinatus transposition tended to have less active abduction (p = 0.05) and external rotation (p = 0.05). Distal clavicular excision had little effect on postoperative motion in abduction (p = 0.07), external rotation (p = 0.47), or internal rotation (p = 0.04). Similarly, a biceps tear or tenodesis did not significantly influence the final active abduction (p = 0.33), external rotation (p = 0.21), or internal rotation (p < 0.54).

    Strength

    Postoperatively, muscle strength in abduction was normal in fifty-three shoulders, good in thirty-five, fair in fifteen, and poor in two. Strength in flexion was normal in sixty-five shoulders, good in twenty-six, fair in twelve, and poor in two. Strength in external rotation was normal in sixty-two shoulders, good in thirty, fair in eleven, and poor in two. The improvements in abduction strength (p < 0.03) and external rotation strength (p < 0.002) were significant. Older age was associated with less postoperative strength in abduction (p = 0.08, r = -0.17), flexion (p = 0.02, r = -0.23), and external rotation (p = 0.03, r = -0.22). Preoperative strength was associated with postoperative strength, as patients with stronger muscle groups preoperatively also had stronger abduction (p = 0.002, r = 0.31), flexion (p = 0.006, r = 0.27), and external rotation (p = 0.003, r = 0.29) postoperatively. Tear size affected final strength, with less strength in abduction (p = 0.003, r = -0.33), flexion (p = 0.001, r = -0.31), and external rotation (p = 0.01, r = -0.27) in patients with a large or massive tear. Distal clavicular excision was associated with less strength in abduction (p < 0.03), flexion (p = 0.0003), and external rotation (p = 0.0008). However, more patients with a larger tear required distal clavicular resection (p < 0.02). Distal clavicular resection was carried out in seven of the sixteen shoulders with a small tear, eighteen of the forty with a medium tear, twenty-one of the thirty-eight with a large tear, and ten of the eleven with a massive tear. A biceps tear or tenodesis was present in one of the sixteen shoulders with a small tear, three of the forty with a medium tear, five of the thirty-eight with a large tear, and five of the eleven with a massive tear. A biceps tear or tenodesis had no significant effect on postoperative strength in abduction (p < 0.052), flexion (p < 0.23), or external rotation (p = 0.12).

    Patient Satisfaction and Activities

    Patients were asked to rate the status of the shoulder after the surgery as much better, better, the same, or worse. Seventy-seven shoulders were considered to be much better by the patient; twenty, better; five, the same; and three, worse postoperatively than they had been before the surgery. There was a significant association between the patient's response and the tear size (p = 0.003). Fourteen of the sixteen shoulders with a small tear, thirty-four of the forty with a medium tear, twenty-three of the thirty-eight with a large tear, and six of the eleven with a massive tear were considered to be much better by the patient. Following the surgery, 89% of the patients were able to return to work without modifications and 8% returned to a modified work position. Similarly, 78% of the patients were able to resume their sports activities, which included golf (twelve patients), tennis (eight), volleyball (two), basketball (one), racquetball (one), and darts (one).

    Rating of the Results

    With use of the Neer system23, sixty-eight shoulders were rated as excellent; sixteen, as satisfactory; and twenty-one, as unsatisfactory. There was often a combination of factors leading to an unsatisfactory result. The result was considered unsatisfactory because of inadequate pain relief in nine shoulders, because of limited active abduction in eleven, and because of limited external rotation in one. There was no association between age and the result rating (p = 0.14). Men had better result ratings (p = 0.01). The tear size significantly affected the result rating (p = 0.0002). The result was excellent for thirteen of the sixteen shoulders with a small tear, thirty-two of the forty with a medium tear, twenty-one of the thirty-eight with a large tear, and two of the eleven with a massive tear. All of the fifteen patients with subscapularis transfer had a reduction of pain, to no pain or slight pain. There were nine excellent results, one satisfactory result, and five unsatisfactory results in this group. Four of the five shoulders with an unsatisfactory result lost active abduction, ranging from 10° to 90°.

    Complications and Reoperations

    Four patients had four medical complications: pneumonia, deep venous thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and postoperative depression. Two patients had a superficial wound infection, which was successfully treated with oral antibiotics. In the patient with the fascia lata graft, a seroma developed at the graft donor site, which drained for ten days.
    There were eight reoperations. Two shoulders, one with a small tear and one with a medium tear, had excision of a hypertrophic bursal scar and revision acromioplasty. In another shoulder, with a massive tear, severe glenohumeral arthritis developed two years following the rotator cuff repair and prosthetic shoulder arthroplasty was required. Five patients with clinically apparent failure of rotator cuff tendon-healing and persistent postoperative pain underwent rerepair of the rotator cuff tear; the tear at the initial operation was small in one of these patients, medium in two, and massive in two. Injury was thought to be the cause of the tearing in two of these patients; aggressive physiotherapy, in one; and impaired healing due to renal failure and ongoing dialysis, in one. The cause was unknown in the fifth patient. Seven of the eight patients who had a reoperation had some pain relief after it, and one patient continued to have severe pain. At the final evaluation, three of the shoulders had an excellent result; one, a satisfactory result; and four, an unsatisfactory result. A reoperation was needed more commonly by the shoulders with a massive rotator cuff tear (p = 0.003).
    This study confirms that standard repair of rotator cuff tendons combined with anterior-inferior acromioplasty yields consistently good and enduring outcomes in a high percentage of patients. Eighty-four (80%) of the shoulders in our series had an excellent or satisfactory outcome at an average of thirteen years after the rotator cuff surgery. This study supports previously published findings indicating that the preoperative range of motion, preoperative strength, and size of the tendon lesion affect the eventual outcome1-3,5,8,10,15,22,24-29. Because of the prospective nature of this study and the consistent methods of collection of the data on patient characteristics, pathological findings at the operation, method of operative treatment, and follow-up, a vigorous statistical analysis could be accomplished to assess the relationship of various parameters with the outcome of the rotator cuff repair (Table IITable II). At the latest follow-up evaluation, the result was excellent or satisfactory for 94% and 85% of the small and medium tears, respectively, compared with 74% and 27% of the large and massive tears, respectively. It is clear that these standard techniques have deficiencies when used for the repair of massive tears, and introduction of newer, experimental repair methods for improving the functional outcome in this group may be justified13,22.
    There have been reports suggesting that older patients tend to have larger tears and that the quality of the cuff tissue, its attachment to bone, and the potential for a durable repair deteriorate with age or disuse6,29. In this study, age was related to tear size, with older patients having larger tears. We found no clear explanation for the adverse effect of female gender on the outcome parameters. Lesser preoperative active motion, preoperative weakness, distal clavicular excision, and transposition repair techniques were also associated with larger tears, confirming the critical importance of tear size in determining the outcome of this operation. Other factors, such as the etiology of the tear, side of the repair, hand dominance, time from the beginning of symptoms to surgery, shape of the acromion, location of the tear, biceps tenodesis, and type of postoperative immobilization, did not have a significant effect on outcome.
    Anterior-inferior acromioplasty was performed in all shoulders in this series and continues to be an important part of rotator cuff repair in our practice. We agree with other authors that acromioplasty, by creating space for the rotator cuff tendons, provides better surgical exposure and thus improves the quality of the surgical repair, and that, by relieving impingement, it offers protection to the tendons during healing, facilitates rehabilitation, and lessens postoperative pain4,23,30,31. We now rarely perform distal clavicular excision as part of rotator cuff repair, as we believe that it contributes little, if any, benefit. We reserve this procedure for patients with symptoms, signs, and the radiographic appearance of degenerative changes at the acromioclavicular joint. If osteophytes on the inferior surface of the acromioclavicular joint compromise the supraspinatus outlet, they are trimmed. Currently we perform biceps tenodesis only if greater than 50% of the diameter of the tendon is torn or the tendon is dislocated medially. We believe that tendon-transposition repair techniques are occasionally useful as a part of the surgeon's armamentarium; however, they are infrequently used in current practice. We continue to individualize the type of postoperative limb support. A shoulder immobilizer is usually used both to relieve pain and to remind the patient to avoid early active use of the shoulder. For selected patients with somewhat weakened tendon material adjacent to the tear and a more extensive tear, a splint with a low angle of abduction is used to support the weight of the arm and hopefully to enhance healing of the repair with less stress on the tissues. This is particularly true for patients with a substantial portion of the repair in the posterior aspect of the rotator cuff. Similarly we continue to use early passive motion with a delay in active motion for four to six weeks.
    It seems clear that surgical repair of symptomatic rotator cuff tears is a highly satisfactory operation with long-term benefit to the patient. To improve the results, and particularly to enhance postoperative active motion and strength, better methods must be developed for the repair of larger tendon tears.
    Adamson GJ, and Tibone JE: Ten-year assessment of primary rotator cuff repairs. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,1993.2: 57-63, 257  1993 
     
    Bartolozzi A; Andreychik D; and Ahmad S: Determinants of outcome in the treatment of rotator cuff disease. Clin Orthop,1994.308: 90-7, 30890  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Bigliani LU; Cordasco FA; McIlveen SJ; and Musso ES: Operative repairs of massive rotator cuff tears: long-term results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,1992.1: 120-30, 1120  1992 
     
    Ellman H; Hanker G; and Bayer M: Repair of the rotator cuff. End-result study of factors influencing reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1986.68: 1136-44, 681136  1986  [PubMed]
     
    Essman JA; Bell RH; and Askew M: Full thickness rotator cuff tear. An analysis of results. Clin Orthop,1991.265: 170-7, 265170  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Harryman DT II; Mack LA; Wang KY; Jackins SE; Richardson ML; and Matsen FA III: Repairs of the rotator cuff. Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1991.73: 982-9, 73982  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Iannotti JP: Full-thickness rotator cuff tears: factors affecting surgical outcome. J Am Acad Orthop Surg,1994.2: 87-95, 287  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Itoi E, and Tabata S: Incomplete rotator cuff tears. Results of operative treatment. Clin Orthop,1992.284: 128-35, 284128  1992  [PubMed]
     
    Nobuhara K; Hata Y; and Komai M: Surgical procedure and results of repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff. Clin Orthop.,1994.304: 54-9, 30454  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Postacchini F; Perugia D; and Rampoldi M: Rotator cuff tears. Results of surgical repair. Ital J Orthop Traumatol,1992.18: 173-88, 18173  1992  [PubMed]
     
    Samilson RL, and Binder WF: Symptomatic full thickness tears of rotator cuff. An analysis of 292 shoulders in 276 patients. Orthop Clin North Am,1975.6: 449-66, 6449  1975  [PubMed]
     
    Wülker N; Melzer C; and Wirth CS: Shoulder surgery for rotator cuff tears. Ultrasonographic 3-year follow-up of 97 cases. Acta Orthop Scand,1991.62: 142-7, 62142  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Burkhart SS: Arthroscopic treatment of massive rotator cuff tears. Clinical results and biomechanical rationale. Clin Orthop,1991.267: 45-56, 26745  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Cofield RH: Subscapular muscle transposition for repair of chronic rotator cuff tears. Surg Gynecol Obstet,1982.154: 667-72, 154667  1982  [PubMed]
     
    Gerber C: Latissimus dorsi transfer for the treatment of irreparable tears of the rotator cuff. Clin Orthop,1992.275: 152-60, 275152  1992  [PubMed]
     
    Packer NP; Calvert PT; Bayley JI; and Kessel L: Operative treatment of chronic ruptures of the rotator cuff of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1983.65: 171-5, 65171  1983  [PubMed]
     
    Snyder SJ; Pachelli AF; Del Pizzo W; Friedman MJ; Ferkel RD; and Pattee G: Partial thickness rotator cuff tears: results of arthroscopic treatment. Arthroscopy,1991.7: 1-7, 71  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Visuri T; Kiviluoto O; and Eskelin M: Carbon fiber for repair of the rotator cuff. A 4-year follow-up of 14 cases. Acta Orthop Scand,1991.62: 356-9, 62356  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Levy HJ; Gardner RD; and Lemak LJ: Arthroscopic subacromial decompression in the treatment of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy,1991.7: 8-13, 78  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Montgomery TJ; Yerger B; and Savoie FH: Management of rotator cuff tears: a comparison of arthroscopic debridement and surgical repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,1994.3: 70-8, 370  1994 
     
    Gartsman GM; Brinker MR; and Khan M: Early effectiveness of arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff. An outcome analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1998.80: 33-40, 8033  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Rockwood CA Jr; Williams GR Jr; and Burkhead WZ Jr: D衲idement of degenerative, irreparable lesions of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1995.77: 857-66, 77857  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Neer CS II: Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder. A preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1972.54: 41-50, 5441  1972  [PubMed]
     
    Björkenheim JM; Paavolainen P; Ahovuo J; and Slütis P: Surgical repair of the rotator cuff and surrounding tissues. Factors influencing the results. Clin Orthop,1988.236: 148-53, 236148  1988  [PubMed]
     
    Cofield RH: Current concepts review. Rotator cuff disease of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1985.67: 974-9, 67974  1985  [PubMed]
     
    Kirschenbaum D; Coyle MP Jr; Leddy JP; Katsaros P; Tan F Jr; and Cody RP: Shoulder strength with rotator cuff tears. Pre- and postoperative analysis. Clin Orthop,1993.288: 174-8, 288174  1993  [PubMed]
     
    Sward L; Hughes JS; Amis A; and Wallace WA: The strength of surgical repairs of the rotator cuff. A biomechanical study on cadavers. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1992.74: 585-8, 74585  1992  [PubMed]
     
    Vastamüki M: Factors influencing the operative results of rotator cuff rupture. Int Orthop,1986.10: 177-81, 10177  1986  [PubMed]
     
    Wolfgang GL: Surgical repair of tears of the rotator cuff of the shoulder. Factors influencing the result. J Bone Joint Surg Am.,1974.56: 14-26, 5614  1974  [PubMed]
     
    Rockwood CA Jr, and Lyons FR: Shoulder impingement syndrome: diagnosis, radiographic evaluation, and treatment with a modified Neer acromioplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1993.75: 409-24, 75409  1993  [PubMed]
     
    Sachs RA; Stone ML; and Devine S: Open vs. arthroscopic acromioplasty: a prospective, randomized study. Arthroscopy,1994.10: 248-54, 10248  1994  [PubMed]
     

    Submit a comment

    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1:Graph showing the distribution of follow-up times.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2:Graph showing the preoperative and postoperative ranges of abduction and external rotation for each tear size.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE I:  Characteristics of the Rotator Cuff Tears
    Number (%)
    Size
      Small (<1 cm)16 (15)
      Medium (1 to <3 cm)40 (38)
      Large (3 to <5 cm)38 (36)
      Massive (5 cm)11 (10)
    Location
      Supraspinatus58 (55)
      Supraspinatus and infraspinatus33 (31)
      Supraspinatus and subscapularis4 (4)
      Supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and subscapularis3 (3)
      Subscapularis3 (3)
      Interval tear3 (3)
      Infraspinatus1 (1)
    Shape
      Longitudinal14 (13)
      Transverse17 (16)
      Longitudinal and transverse37 (35)
      Triangular23 (22)
      Trapezoidal14 (13)
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE II:  Associations Between Preoperative and Operative Factors and the Outcomes of Rotator Cuff Repair*
    *The table shows the factors that had significant association with outcome parameters. A plus sign indicates that the factor had a positive effect on the outcome parameter or parameters, and a minus sign indicates that the factor had a negative effect.
    Preoperative and Operative FactorsP Value
    Pain ReliefActive MotionStrengthResult RatingPatient SatisfactionReoperation
    Age (-)0.0050.04
    Female gender (-)0.040.030.01
    Preoperative active motion (+)0.0040.030.05
    Preoperative strength (+)0.0001
    Tear size (-)0.00010.00060.00020.0030.003
    Distal clavicular excision (-)0.03
    Transposition repair method (-)0.050.02
    Adamson GJ, and Tibone JE: Ten-year assessment of primary rotator cuff repairs. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,1993.2: 57-63, 257  1993 
     
    Bartolozzi A; Andreychik D; and Ahmad S: Determinants of outcome in the treatment of rotator cuff disease. Clin Orthop,1994.308: 90-7, 30890  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Bigliani LU; Cordasco FA; McIlveen SJ; and Musso ES: Operative repairs of massive rotator cuff tears: long-term results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,1992.1: 120-30, 1120  1992 
     
    Ellman H; Hanker G; and Bayer M: Repair of the rotator cuff. End-result study of factors influencing reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1986.68: 1136-44, 681136  1986  [PubMed]
     
    Essman JA; Bell RH; and Askew M: Full thickness rotator cuff tear. An analysis of results. Clin Orthop,1991.265: 170-7, 265170  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Harryman DT II; Mack LA; Wang KY; Jackins SE; Richardson ML; and Matsen FA III: Repairs of the rotator cuff. Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1991.73: 982-9, 73982  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Iannotti JP: Full-thickness rotator cuff tears: factors affecting surgical outcome. J Am Acad Orthop Surg,1994.2: 87-95, 287  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Itoi E, and Tabata S: Incomplete rotator cuff tears. Results of operative treatment. Clin Orthop,1992.284: 128-35, 284128  1992  [PubMed]
     
    Nobuhara K; Hata Y; and Komai M: Surgical procedure and results of repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff. Clin Orthop.,1994.304: 54-9, 30454  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Postacchini F; Perugia D; and Rampoldi M: Rotator cuff tears. Results of surgical repair. Ital J Orthop Traumatol,1992.18: 173-88, 18173  1992  [PubMed]
     
    Samilson RL, and Binder WF: Symptomatic full thickness tears of rotator cuff. An analysis of 292 shoulders in 276 patients. Orthop Clin North Am,1975.6: 449-66, 6449  1975  [PubMed]
     
    Wülker N; Melzer C; and Wirth CS: Shoulder surgery for rotator cuff tears. Ultrasonographic 3-year follow-up of 97 cases. Acta Orthop Scand,1991.62: 142-7, 62142  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Burkhart SS: Arthroscopic treatment of massive rotator cuff tears. Clinical results and biomechanical rationale. Clin Orthop,1991.267: 45-56, 26745  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Cofield RH: Subscapular muscle transposition for repair of chronic rotator cuff tears. Surg Gynecol Obstet,1982.154: 667-72, 154667  1982  [PubMed]
     
    Gerber C: Latissimus dorsi transfer for the treatment of irreparable tears of the rotator cuff. Clin Orthop,1992.275: 152-60, 275152  1992  [PubMed]
     
    Packer NP; Calvert PT; Bayley JI; and Kessel L: Operative treatment of chronic ruptures of the rotator cuff of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1983.65: 171-5, 65171  1983  [PubMed]
     
    Snyder SJ; Pachelli AF; Del Pizzo W; Friedman MJ; Ferkel RD; and Pattee G: Partial thickness rotator cuff tears: results of arthroscopic treatment. Arthroscopy,1991.7: 1-7, 71  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Visuri T; Kiviluoto O; and Eskelin M: Carbon fiber for repair of the rotator cuff. A 4-year follow-up of 14 cases. Acta Orthop Scand,1991.62: 356-9, 62356  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Levy HJ; Gardner RD; and Lemak LJ: Arthroscopic subacromial decompression in the treatment of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy,1991.7: 8-13, 78  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Montgomery TJ; Yerger B; and Savoie FH: Management of rotator cuff tears: a comparison of arthroscopic debridement and surgical repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,1994.3: 70-8, 370  1994 
     
    Gartsman GM; Brinker MR; and Khan M: Early effectiveness of arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff. An outcome analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1998.80: 33-40, 8033  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Rockwood CA Jr; Williams GR Jr; and Burkhead WZ Jr: D衲idement of degenerative, irreparable lesions of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1995.77: 857-66, 77857  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Neer CS II: Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder. A preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1972.54: 41-50, 5441  1972  [PubMed]
     
    Björkenheim JM; Paavolainen P; Ahovuo J; and Slütis P: Surgical repair of the rotator cuff and surrounding tissues. Factors influencing the results. Clin Orthop,1988.236: 148-53, 236148  1988  [PubMed]
     
    Cofield RH: Current concepts review. Rotator cuff disease of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1985.67: 974-9, 67974  1985  [PubMed]
     
    Kirschenbaum D; Coyle MP Jr; Leddy JP; Katsaros P; Tan F Jr; and Cody RP: Shoulder strength with rotator cuff tears. Pre- and postoperative analysis. Clin Orthop,1993.288: 174-8, 288174  1993  [PubMed]
     
    Sward L; Hughes JS; Amis A; and Wallace WA: The strength of surgical repairs of the rotator cuff. A biomechanical study on cadavers. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1992.74: 585-8, 74585  1992  [PubMed]
     
    Vastamüki M: Factors influencing the operative results of rotator cuff rupture. Int Orthop,1986.10: 177-81, 10177  1986  [PubMed]
     
    Wolfgang GL: Surgical repair of tears of the rotator cuff of the shoulder. Factors influencing the result. J Bone Joint Surg Am.,1974.56: 14-26, 5614  1974  [PubMed]
     
    Rockwood CA Jr, and Lyons FR: Shoulder impingement syndrome: diagnosis, radiographic evaluation, and treatment with a modified Neer acromioplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1993.75: 409-24, 75409  1993  [PubMed]
     
    Sachs RA; Stone ML; and Devine S: Open vs. arthroscopic acromioplasty: a prospective, randomized study. Arthroscopy,1994.10: 248-54, 10248  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement in patients aged 50 years or older.
    Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association: Issue date- 2012 Jan
    Guidelines
    Results provided by:
    PubMed
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    02/16/2012
    MA - Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
    03/06/2012
    RI - West Bay Orthopaedics and Neurosurgery, Inc.
    03/22/2012
    IL - Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush
    05/18/2012
    NH - Concord Orthopaedics