0
Scientific Article   |    
Structural Stages in the Development of the Long Bones and Epiphyses A Study in the New Zealand White Rabbit
Roberto Rivas, MD; Frederic Shapiro, MD
View Disclosures and Other Information
Investigation performed at the Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

Roberto Rivas, MD
Centro Nacional de Rehabilitación, Mexico City, Mexico

Frederic Shapiro, MD
Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children’s Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Enders-11, Boston, MA 02115. Please address requests for reprints to Dr. Shapiro.

No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. No funds were received in support of this study.

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  2002; 84:85-100 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

Background: Histologic delineation of the events involved in the development of long bones and the developmental age at which these events occur is needed to elucidate the genetic and molecular mechanisms associated with these events. This report describes the sequence of histologic events involved in the formation of long bones and their epiphyses in the New Zealand White rabbit.

Methods: Prenatal studies were performed on twelve, fourteen, fifteen, sixteen, eighteen, twenty-one, twenty-four, and twenty-seven-day-old rabbit embryos, and postnatal studies were performed on newborn rabbits and on three-to-four-day-old; one, two, four, and six-week-old; and two, three, four, six, and eight-month-old rabbits. Histologic specimens from embryos were embedded in plastic and stained with toluidine blue or safranin O-fast green, and specimens from postnatal rabbits were embedded in paraffin and stained with hematoxylin and eosin or safranin O-fast green.

Results: Studies of twelve-day-old embryos demonstrated upper and lower limb buds filled with undifferentiated mesenchymal cells, and studies of fourteen-day-old embryos showed mesenchymal condensation and beginning cartilage formation outlining major long bones. Long-bone and epiphyseal development progressed through sixteen structural stages, and the developmental age at which these stages occurred was determined. These stages included limb-bud formation with uniform distribution of mesenchymal cells and formation of an apical ectodermal ridge (stage 1); mesenchymal condensation (stage 2); cartilage differentiation (stage 3); formation of a primary center of ossification (stage 4a); epiphyseal cartilage vascularization with formation of cartilage canals (stage 7); vascular invasion of the developing secondary ossification center (stage 9); bone formation and marrow cavitation in the secondary ossification center with formation of hematopoietic marrow (stage 10); fullest relative extent of secondary-ossification-center development in epiphyseal cartilage (stage 14); thinning of the physis (stage 15); and resorption of the physis with establishment of continuity between epiphyseal and metaphyseal circulations (stage 16).

Clinical Relevance: The detailed classification system presented here will allow for correlations between genetic and molecular mechanisms and histologic events in normal and abnormal development of long bones and their epiphyses. Many of the nonosseous structures formed during long-bone and epiphyseal development in the fetus, infant, and child are amenable to assessment with sonography and magnetic resonance imaging. An understanding of the histopathological features of developmental abnormalities of the long bones and their epiphyses revealed with newer imaging techniques should greatly improve management by allowing earlier diagnosis.

Figures in this Article
    Scientific studies have revealed that bones grow in length by increments at their cartilaginous ends and in width by periosteal apposition and that they remodel by resorption at the metaphyseal and inner cortical regions1-3. In the last several years, much has been learned about the molecular mechanisms involved in limb morphogenesis4-10. Correlation of the continuum of histologic events with molecular mechanisms during the development of a long bone requires knowledge of the precise sequence of these histologic events and the times at which they occur.
    The purposes of the present study were to determine the sequence of histologic events involved in the formation of long bones and their epiphyses from the embryonic limb-bud stage to skeletal maturity, to classify the various stages, and to define the time at which each event occurs in the New Zealand White rabbit.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-A:The components of the developing end of a long bone. The epiphysis is composed of the articular cartilage (AC), the epiphyseal cartilage (EC), and the physis (growth plate). The secondary ossification center (SOC) forms by the endochondral mechanism within the epiphyseal cartilage. It is completely surrounded in the earlier phases of development by another growth plate, the growth plate of the secondary ossification center (GP-SOC), which is responsible for the circumferential growth of the secondary center.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-B:The major stages in the formation and development of long bones and epiphyses (defined in Table I), from stage 1 to stage 16a.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2:a through f, Photographs illustrating the developing limb bud in the rabbit embryo (stage 1). a and b show portions of the embryo at twelve days. In a, both lower limb buds are seen. In b, a limb bud developing as an outpouching of the side wall is evident. c through f demonstrate the appearance of limb buds at fourteen days. In c, the head and the developing eye are seen (top). The upper and lower limb buds are seen as well. In d, a higher-power view of the lower limb bud shows the elevated apical ectodermal ridge (arrow). e and f, from another embryo, show the apical ectodermal ridge of the upper extremity (solid arrow) and the central constriction in the lower limb bud, which begins the differentiation of the proximal and more distal segments (open arrow).
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-A:Figs. 3-A and 3-B Histologic sections illustrating a portion of the upper limb bud from a twelve-day-old embryo (stage 1). Fig. 3-A Histologic section illustrating the limb bud with undifferentiated mesenchymal cells. The apical ectodermal ridge (arrow) is seen at the tip of the limb bud (toluidine blue, 70).
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-B:Figs. 3-A and 3-B Histologic sections illustrating a portion of the upper limb bud from a twelve-day-old embryo (stage 1). Fig. 3-B A higher-power view of a part of the limb bud shows the cells of the apical ectodermal ridge (arrow) and the closely packed undifferentiated mesenchymal cells within the limb bud (toluidine blue, 180).
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 4:Two upper-extremity phalanges in different stages of development are seen. At right, the outline of the bone is being formed at the stage of mesenchymal condensation (stage 2). At left, the more proximal phalanx shows the pink-staining cellular accumulation that is indicative of the early cartilage model of the developing bone (stage 3). Interzone formation (stage 3a) is illustrated between the two phalanges (toluidine blue, 60).
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 5:a: Photomicrograph showing the cartilage model of a femur from a fifteen-day-old embryo with central chondrocyte hypertrophy occurring in the middle of the developing shaft (stage 3b) (toluidine blue, 75). b: Low-power photomicrograph of the central portion of the humerus at eighteen days. The original cartilage model still persists at either side of the photograph (stage 3), where the matrix stains a deep purple. There is chondrocyte hypertrophy throughout most of the central portion of the shaft (stage 3b). Intramembranous bone formation occurs circumferentially around the middle portion of the area of chondrocyte hypertrophy in the narrowest region (stage 4a). Intramembranous bone is formed by the periosteum, and vessels from the periosteum invade the hypertrophic chondrocyte region (arrow) to begin formation of endochondral bone (stage 5a) (toluidine blue, 25). c: Photomicrograph of the middle region of the humerus of a ­sixteen-day-old embryo. Early intramembranous bone formation is evident above, and the hypertrophic chondrocyte mass is seen below. The outer fibrous layer and the inner osteogenic layer of the periosteum have formed. The inner layer contains osteoblasts, newly woven bone matrix, and blood vessels with red blood cells (seen with the stain as light-blue regions). A thin, ­light-purple-staining lamina of primary intramembranous bone is evident against the underlying hypertrophic chondrocyte region (arrow), but there still has been no invasion of the chondrocyte region by blood ­vessels. The primary center of ossification is partly composed of periosteal intramembranous bone (toluidine blue, 75). d: This photomicrograph of the central region of the humerus of an eighteen-day-old embryo shows further ­development of periosteal intramembranous bone and ­vascular invasion of the central hypertrophic chondrocytes. The periosteal vessel invasion (arrow), which is accompanied by mesenchymal osteoprogenitor cells, will lead shortly to endochondral bone formation on cartilage cores (toluidine blue, 75).
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 6:The chondrocytes immediately beyond the hypertrophic chondrocytes take on a flattened and columnar conformation as the physis forms (white arrows). This photomicrograph of the distal aspect of the humerus of a twenty-one-day-old embryo also illustrates the circumferential perichondrial groove, which begins to form just beyond the hypertrophic cells (curved arrows). The hypertrophic cell region appears to be expanding or bulging outwardly (stage 6) (toluidine blue, ¥75).
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 7:The specific structural features of the physis have developed when it has reached its main position toward the end of the developing bone (stage 6a). This color photomicrograph of the proximal aspect of the tibia of a four-week-old embryo shows the physeal cartilage in red, with adjacent epiphyseal bone (above) and metaphyseal bone (below) in blue. The physeal cartilage is composed of resting, proliferating (columnar), and hypertrophic cell zones (toluidine blue, ¥60).
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 8:Epiphyseal cartilage vascularization develops next (stage 7). This photo­micrograph of the epiphyseal region of the distal part of a metatarsal of a postnatal rabbit shows the metaphyseal bone at the lower part of the photomicrograph and the epiphyseal cartilage at the top. The physis and the perichondrial ossification groove are seen centrally and at left. A perichondrial vessel is seen entering the epiphyseal cartilage, which represents the earliest stages of epiphyseal cartilage vascularization. The vessels in the epiphyseal cartilage are present in what are referred to as cartilage canals (hematoxylin and eosin, 75).
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 9:a through f: Color photomicrographs demonstrating formation of the secondary ossification center, beginning with the earliest development of a spherical collection of hypertrophic chondrocytes in the central epiphyseal cartilage mass and ending with a hemispheric arc of chondrocytes with secondary-center endochondral bone within. These photomicrographs encompass stages 7 and 8 (a) through stage 12 (h). All sections are stained with safranin O-fast green. a and b: Cartilage canals (stage 7), central cartilage hypertrophy (stage 8), and vascular invasion of hypertrophic chondrocytes in a metatarsal at one week (a, 20; b, 50). c: Earliest new-bone formation on cartilage cores (stage 10) (180). d: Spherical arc of ­hypertrophic chondrocytes in the distal aspect of the femur at three days (20). e: Increased endochondral bone formation, with all marrow hematopoietic (stage 10) (25). f: Higher-power view of secondary-ossification-center endochondral bone, with all marrow hematopoietic (50). g: Early transformation of the spherical orientation of hypertrophic chondrocytes to a hemispheric orientation (stage 12) (20). h: Hemispheric orientation of chondrocytes in the proximal aspect of the humerus at two weeks (stage 12) (¥50).
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 10:Drawings outlining the orientation of hypertrophic chondrocytes during formation of the secondary ossification center, from stage 6a (left) to stage 12 (right) (vascularity not shown). GP-SOC = growth plate of secondary ossification center.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 11:Shortly after formation of the hemispherical pattern of the secondary-ossification-center hypertrophic chondrocytes, the epiphyseal cartilage tissue adjacent to the physis completes its endochondral transformation to bone, forming what is referred to as the epiphyseal bone plate (stage 13a). In this photomicrograph, the secondary ossification ­center is above and the metaphyseal bone adjacent to the physis is below. A line of demarcation can be seen between the relatively light-staining epiphyseal cartilage and the slightly darker-staining physeal cartilage.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 12:Maturation of the articular cartilage and formation of the subchondral bone plate (stage 15b) occur in the final stages of epiphyseal development. This photomicrograph of the proximal aspect of the tibia in a six-month-old rabbit shows the tangential layer (top); the transitional and radial layers encompassing most of the articular cartilage structure; the tidemark (arrow); the calcified zone of cartilage, which persists throughout adult life; and the more deeply staining subchondral bone (bottom). Calcification of the lowest zone of the articular cartilage, tidemark formation, and the presence of fatty marrow represent stage 16a (safranin O-fast green, 75).
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE I:  Histologic Stages in Long-Bone and Epiphyseal Development
    *The substages, labeled a and b, refer to events occurring at the same time as a particular stage in different parts of the same bone or to a structurally important continuation of the same process at a slightly later time.
    Stage*Histologic Events
    ?1Limb-bud formation, uniform distribution of mesenchymal cells, and formation of apical ectodermal ridge
    ?2Mesenchymal condensation
    ?3Cartilage differentiation
    ?3aInterzone formation
    ?3bChondrocyte hypertrophy in middle part of long-bone cartilage model
    ?4Epiphyseal shaping
    ?4aFormation of intramembranous periosteal bone at mid-diaphysis (primary center of ossification)
    ?5Resorption of joint interzone and formation of smooth articular cartilage surface
    ?5aVascular invasion of hypertrophic chondrocyte area, endochondral bone formation (mid-diaphysis), and completion of formation of primary center of ossification
    ?6Formation of the physis and of peripheral perichondrial groove tissue
    ?6aFarthest relative extent of epiphyseal/physeal position
    ?7Vascularization of epiphyseal cartilage with formation of cartilage canals
    ?8Central chondrocyte hypertrophy to form spherical mass, development of growth plate completely surrounding secondary ossification center
    ?9Vascular invasion of developing secondary ossification center into hypertrophic chondrocytes adjacent to mineralized cartilage matrix
    10Bone formation and marrow cavitation in secondary ossification center, formation of hematopoietic marrow
    11Increase in size of secondary ossification center, decrease in size of epiphyseal cartilage
    12Central chondrocyte hypertrophy and secondary-ossification-center growth-plate change from spherical to hemi- spherical orientation
    13Fat in marrow, hematopoietic marrow adjacent to secondary-ossification-center growth plate
    13aEpiphyseal bone-plate formation
    14Fullest relative extent of secondary-ossification-center development in epiphyseal cartilage
    15Thinning of physis
    15aInvolution of secondary-ossification-center growth plate
    15bSubchondral bone-plate formation
    16Resorption of physis with linkage of epiphyseal and metaphyseal circulations
    16aCalcification of lowest zone of articular cartilage, tidemark formation, and transformation of all marrow to fat
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE II:  Relationship Between Age and Developmental Stage at Major Long Bones and Their Epiphyses
    *Two separate secondary ossification centers initially form in the proximal part of the humerus. From stages 8 to 15, the developmental stages for the medial center and the lateral center are separated by a slash. Differentiation is not made after fusion into one osseous mass. †Two separate secondary ossification centers initially form in the proximal part of the femur. The developmental stages for the femoral head center and the greater trochanter center are separated by a slash. Differentiation is not made after fusion into one osseous mass. ‡Two separate secondary ossification centers initially form in the proximal part of the tibia. The developmental stages for the main proximal center and the tibial tubercle center are separated by a slash. Differentiation is not made after fusion into one osseous mass. §When two or more stages are identified in the same epiphysis at the same time, the stages are separated by commas.
    AgeHumerusProximal Parts of Radius and UlnaFemurTibiaDistal Part of Metatarsal
    Proximal*MiddleDistalProximal†MiddleDistalProximal‡MiddleDistal
    Prenatal
    12 d11111111
    14 d23222322322
    15 d§3, 3a, 43b3, 3a, 43, 3a, 43, 3a, 43b3, 3a, 43, 3a, 43b3, 3a, 43
    16 d44a4444a444a43a
    18 d6a5a5555a555a54
    21 d76666664
    24 d886a777
    27 d8/8887776a6
    Postnatal
    Newborn9/999/99977
    3-4 d10/999/910107
    1 wk10/10109/91110910
    2 wk12/11121212/1211121210
    4 wk§13/13, 13a/13a13, 13a13a14/1413, 13a14/131414
    6 wk14
    2 mo15/151515/151515/151515
    3 mo§15, 15a, 15b15, 15a, 15b15, 15a, 15b15a15a/15a15a15
    4 mo15b15b/15b15b16
    6 mo1616a16
    8 mo161616161616a16a
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE III:  Time of Formation of Primary and Secondary Ossification Centers in the Rabbit*
    *The times were derived from this study and others58-62. †The postnatal time-periods are underlined. ‡See reference 58.
    Primary Center of Ossification (embryonic time-periods)Secondary Centers of Ossification† (late embryonic and postnatal time-periods)
    Humerus16-18 dProximal: 28-30 d; newbornDistal: 28-30 d; newborn
    Radius18 dProximal: 7 dDistal: 7 d
    Ulna18 dProximal: 3-5 d; 7 dDistal: 3-6 d; 7 d
    MetacarpalsI: 26-27 dII, III: 21-23 dIV: 24 dV: 25 d
    Upper-extremity phalangesAll: 23-29 d (most: 25-28 d)‡
    Femur18 dHead: newborn - 4 d; all by 10 dGreater trochanter: 4 d; all by 15 dDistal: 28 d - 4 d
    Tibia19 dProximal: newborn - 4 dDistal: earliest 4 d; 7 d
    Fibula19 dProximal: 14 dDistal: 7 d
    MetatarsalsII: 25 dIII, IV, V: 23 dDistal: 7 d
    Lower-extremity phalangesNearly all: 25-26 d (range, 24-27 d)‡

    Study Group

    The formation and development of the long bones and epiphyses in the New Zealand White rabbit were studied ­prenatally in twelve, fourteen, fifteen, sixteen, eighteen, twenty-one, twenty-four, and twenty-seven-day-old embryos and post­natally in newborn; three-to-four-day-old; one, two, four, and six-week-old; and two, three, four, six, and eight-month-old animals. The embryos were obtained from Pel-Freez Biologicals (Rogers, Arkansas). The embryos were staged according to the external criteria described by Edwards11 and in previous studies of rabbit embryos12,13. Twelve, fourteen, and fifteen-day-old embryos were examined and photographed with use of a dissecting photomicroscope for limb-bud definition. Prenatal studies were performed on serial sections of developing upper and lower limbs. Twelve, fourteen, and fifteen-day-old embryos were serially sectioned intact, whereas sixteen, eighteen, twenty-one, twenty-four, and twenty-seven-day-old embryos were studied with use of serial sections of the upper and lower limbs. Usable sections were obtained from two embryos at twelve days, from eight at fourteen days, from three at fifteen days, from three at sixteen days, from three at twenty-one days, from two at twenty-four days, and from three at twenty-seven days. Postnatal animals were killed with an intraperitoneal or intravenous injection of sodium phenobarbital. The postnatal studies involved the epiphyses of the proximal and distal aspects of the humerus, radius, ulna, femur, tibia, and fibula as well as various metacarpal, metatarsal, and phalangeal bones. After decalcification, the epiphyses were cut into halves in either the coronal or the sagittal plane. Multiple sections were then cut from the anterior and posterior coronal segments or the medial and lateral sagittal segments. Serial sections of the entire bone were cut from the femora of newborn, three-to-four-day-old, and one and two-week-old animals and from the humeri of newborn and one-week-old animals. In several cases, transverse sections were cut through the center of the epiphysis. Tables showing the distribution of long bones and the number of postnatal epiphyses studied at each time-period may be obtained from the senior author (F.S.).

    Tissue Preparation for Assessment with Light Microscopy

    Embryonic tissues were fixed in Karnovsky’s fixative, decalcified in 7.5% EDTA, infiltrated with JB4 medium (Polysciences, Warringt­on, Pennsylvania), and embedded in JB4 plastic. Five-microme­ter-thick serial sections of entire embryos or of upper and lower limbs were cut and were stained with 1% toluidine blue or safranin O-fast green14. Postnatal tissues were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin; decalcified in 25% formic acid; cut in the midsagittal, midcoronal, or transverse plane; further decalcified; embedded in paraffin; and sectioned to a 6-m thickness prior to staining with hematoxylin and eosin or safranin O-fast green. Three to fifteen sections were made from each tissue block and were examined.

    Stages in the Formation and Development of Long Bones and Epiphyses

    Terminology

    Adeveloping long bone consists of a diaphysis, epiphyses, and metaphyses. A growth plate, or physis, is formed between each epiphysis and metaphysis2,3,15. These regions are established by the middle of the embryonic stage and undergo proportional changes in size until skeletal maturity. The epiphyses are primarily responsible for the transverse and spherical growth of the ends of the bone and the shaping of the articular surfaces (Fig. 1-A). The longitudinal growth of the diaphysis and the metaphyses is mediated by the physes. Some additional longitudinal growth also occurs with interstitial expansion of the epiphyseal cartilage, including the undersurface of the articular cartilage. Each epiphysis, formed initially completely in cartilage, subsequently differentiates into three histologically distinct regions. Specifically, the cartilage at the outermost boundary of the epiphysis adjacent to the joint space is the articular cartilage, the cartilage adjacent to the metaphysis forms the physis, and the cartilage between the articular cartilage and the physeal cartilage is the epiphyseal cartilage, which will form a secondary ossification center following vascula­r and osteoprogenitor-cell invasion. The cells and matrices of the perichondrial ossification groove of Ranvier surrounding the physis and part of the metaphysis are an integral part of long-bone development15,16.

    Classification

    On the basis of the observations made in this study, we propose a general plan of sixteen stages (twenty-five stages and substages) in the development of long bones and epiphyses in the New Zealand White rabbit (Fig. 1-B and Table I). The substages, labeled a and b, refer to events occurring at the same time as a particular stage in different parts of the same bone or to a structurally important continuation of the same process at a slightly later time. The histologic events occurring at each stage and the time at which each stage occurs are described below and in Table II. Table III summarizes the time of appearance of primary and secondary ossification centers derived from this study and several other studies.

    General Overview of Long-Bone and Epiphyseal Development

    Early Embryonic Phase

    External appearance of limb buds: The upper-extremity limb bud appears slightly before the lower-extremity limb bud does. Each limb develops in proximodistal sequence, with the shoulder and hip developing before more distal regions. At twelve days, both upper and lower limb buds are present (Fig. 2, a and b). They first become visible as slightly thickened ridges, which appear laterally about midway down the body and on either side of the tail. Initially, there is no delineation of the digits in the limb buds. The apical ectodermal ridge at the distal margin of each limb bud can be visualized with the dissecting microscope, especially by fourteen days (Fig. 2, c through f). At sixteen days, the size of the limb bud is increased further and all of the finger and toe rays have begun to form, although with only minimal interdigital separation the spaces between the individual rays remain continuous almost to the tips. At eighteen days, each of the finger rays is approximately two-thirds to fully separate and each of the toe rays is approximately one-third separate.
    Formation of apical endodermal ridge and mesenchymal condensation: At twelve days, the apical ectodermal ridge is seen at the tip of the limb bud but the cells within the bud are uniformly distributed, undifferentiated mesenchymal cells with no evidence of condensation or matrix synthesis (stage 1) (Figs. 3-A and 3-B). At fourteen days, mesenchymal condensation is seen in the region of developing long bones (stage 2) (Tables I and II). The cells, while still undifferentiated, are more closely packed in the core of the limb bud and begin to form the outlines of the various bones. Examples of mesenchymal condensation in the phalanges of the upper extremity are shown in Figure 4.
    Formation of the cartilaginous model of the developing bone: At fourteen and fifteen days, histologic sections reveal cartilage differentiation at the center of the developing model of the major long bones (stage 3) (Tables I and II). Cartilage forms initially in the central part of the area of mesenchymal condensation in the middle part of the humerus and middle part of the femur that will become the diaphysis of the long bone. Cells within the regions of mesenchymal condensation begin to secrete and become surrounded by matrix, which stains pink for glycosaminoglycans on safranin-O and toluidine blue-stained sections (stage 3) (Fig. 4). This finding is more noticeable at fifteen days. The developing joints between each cartilage model show a persisting cellular interzone region, a homogenous aggregation of undifferentiated cells between two adjacent cartilage models (stage 3a) (Fig. 4).
    Formation of the primary ossification center: Shortly after cartilage differentiation and the formation of a model of the developing bone, chondrocyte hypertrophy occurs in the middle part of the long-bone cartilage model (stage 3b) (Fig. 5, a). The ends of the long bones (with the exception of the metatarsals and phalanges) start to show epiphyseal shaping (stage 4). At this time, intramembranous periosteal-bone formation begins at the periphery of the middle of the model of the developing bone (stage 4a) (Fig. 5, b, c, and d). This event is seen first in the humerus. The cellular tissue surrounding the hypertrophic cartilage differentiates into periosteum with an outer fibrous layer and an inner osteoprogenitor-cell layer (Fig. 5, c and d). New-bone formation in the inner periosteal layer precedes vascular invasion of the hypertrophic cell mass (Fig. 5, c and d). Intramembranous periosteal bone formation (stage 4a) begins at sixteen days (Table II). Endochondral bone formation in the region of the hypertrophic chondrocytes occurs in association with vascular invasion from the region of intramembranous bone formation (stage 5a) (Fig. 5, d). Histologic sections were not made on day 17, so we evaluated the processes of endochondral bone formation and vascular invasion on day 18. The endochondral and intramembranous bone formation then extend proximally and distally toward the ends of the bone. The physes at the end of the bone and the surrounding periosteal intramembranous bone-formation sequence finally reach their farthest relative extent. However, in terms of actual bone-tissue formation, the intramembranous sequence (stage 4a) is always slightly in advance of the endo­chondral sequence (stage 5a), both temporally and spatially. These sequences may be separated by only a few hours. Resorption of the joint interzone leads to formation of the joint cavity and articular cartilage surface (stage 5) (Fig. 1-B).
    Beginning formation of the definitive physis and perichondrial groove: The physis then begins to develop early chondrocyte columnation, and the perichondrial ossification groove of Ranvier begins to form peripherally (stage 6) (Fig. 6 and Tables I and II). A circumferential depression is noted in the cartilage model of the developing bone, just beyond the expanded hypertrophic chondrocyte zone. The depression is filled with an area of densely packed cells that represents the farthest extension of the inner bone-forming layer of the periosteum.
    Definitive structure of physis and perichondrial groove: Once the physis has reached a position toward the end of each growing long bone (stage 6a), its structure is well established and persists unchanged until close to skeletal maturity (Fig. 7 and Tables I and II). There is a gradual transition and progressive increase in cell size within the lower proliferating cell layer of the physis and within the hypertrophic layer. Mineralization of the cartilage matrix occurs in the lowest part of the hypertrophic zone, approximately four to five cells away from the metaphyseal region. Virtually all of the mineralization occurs within the longitudinal septae, with little or no mineralization of the transverse septae between the hypertrophic cells. At the physeal-metaphyseal junction, the hypertrophic cell lacunae are invaded by vessels from the metaphysis carrying undifferentiated cells that are aligned along the calcified cartilage cores and soon begin to synthesize bone. The cells and tissues of the perichondrial ossification groove of Ranvier are well structured by this time.

    Late Embryonic Phase

    Toward the end of the embryonic period, differences in developmental timing, but not in pattern, are apparent in different epiphyses. Vascularization of the epiphyseal cartilage develops, with vessels entering from the perichondrial tissues at the periphery (stage 7) (Fig. 8 and Tables I and II). The vessels are continuous with those of the perichondrium and are present in cartilage canals. The canals contain arterioles, venules, capillaries, and sinusoids embedded in a loose connective-tissue matrix. Smaller canals contain capillaries only. The cartilage canals are present several weeks before the formation of the secondary ossification center. With the onset of formation of the secondary ossification center, the vessels of the cartilage canals pass into the hypertrophic cell mass and serve as the source of mesenchymal cells for bone formation.

    Postnatal Period: Formation of the Secondary Ossification Center

    Just before or after birth (depending on the epiphysis), chondrocytes within the center of the epiphyseal cartilage become hypertrophic (Figs. 9[a and b] and 10). This is the initial structural change underlying development of the secondary ossification center (stage 8). The epiphyseal cartilage immediately peripheral to the region of chondrocyte hypertrophy will become the growth plate of the secondary ossification center (Figs. 1-A and 10). Structural events at the developing secondary ossification center parallel events at the physis: the matrix adjacent to the hypertrophic cells mineralizes, and the hypertrophic cell lacunae are invaded by vessels of the cartilage canals carrying mesenchymal cells and pre­osteoblasts (stage 9) (Fig. 9 and Tables I and II). Early in the postnatal phase, much of the epiphyseal cartilage is replaced by secondary-ossification-center bone and hematopoietic marrow is formed (stage 10) (Figs. 9 and 10 and Tables I ). The next stage of development involves disproportionate increases in the size of the secondary ossification center with corresponding decreases in the relative amounts of the epiphyseal cartilage (stage 11) (Figs. 9 and 10 and Tables I ). Moreover, as the size of the secondary ossification center increases relative to the mass of epiphyseal cartilage, there is a change in the orientation of the physis of the secondary ossification center (stage 12) as the shape of the secondary ossification center changes from spherical to hemispherical (Figs. 9 and 10).
    Fat is now present in the central part of the secondary ossification center but hematopoietic marrow persists adjacent to the secondary-ossification-center growth plate (stage 13). Shortly thereafter, epiphyseal cartilage tissue adjacent to the physis completes its endochondral transformation to bone, forming the epiphyseal bone plate (stage 13a) (Fig. 11). The bone plate is the region of the secondary ossification center that matures first, when the secondary ossification center becomes hemispherical. The bone plate is composed initially of woven bone and some persisting cartilage cores, then of woven bone alone, and finally of lamellar bone. Vessels from the epiphyseal secondary-ossification-center marrow pass through it to ramify on the outer surfaces of the resting zone of the physis to provide growth stimulus there. When the physeal cartilage ceases to function and is resorbed at skeletal maturity, the bone plate persists as a transverse bone mass.
    By stage 14, the articular cartilage is adjacent to the growth plate of the secondary ossification center, with small amounts of epiphyseal cartilage between the two. During the final phases of epiphyseal development, the rate of growth diminishes and there is thinning of the physis, which represents the preterminal stage of complete growth-plate cessation. The well-developed epiphyseal bone plate is now on one side of the thinning physis, and the metaphyseal bone is on the other (stage 15). At the same time, there is also a thinning and disappearance of the growth plate of the secondary center of ossification (stage 15a), as evidenced by the decreasing amount of cartilage synthesis and the relatively increased amounts of bone. A continuous subchondral bone layer or plate then forms (stage 15b) (Fig. 12). In the final stages of maturation, the physis is resorbed from both the epiphyseal and metaphyseal sides with linkage of epiphyseal and metaphyseal circulations and bone-marrow continuity seen between the epiphysis and the metaphysis (stage 16). Histologic sections show transphyseal vessels, marked diminution of proliferating and hypertrophic chondrocytes, and thinning of the cartilage physis. The final structural-maturation change at the undersurface of the articular cartilage, after formation of the subchondral bone plate, involves calcification of the lowest zone of articular cartilage and appearance of the tidemark that separates the radial zone of the articular cartilage from the calcified zone (stage 16a). All marrow has been transformed to fat, with hematopoietic marrow no longer seen (stage 16a).

    Development of Specific Epiphyses

    The structural changes at each of the epiphyses during development differ slightly in timing, but the same patterns persist. Table III outlines the relationship between age and development for the epiphyses studied.
    The development of bone as an organ is clearly a dynamic, complex process characterized by both synthesis and resorption. In the rabbit, growth in the length and width of a developing bone with maintenance of the same shape from the late embryonic time-period to skeletal maturity is characterized histologically by the sixteen stages (twenty-five stages and substages) listed here. Major regions develop over several stages—for example, articular cartilage forms from stage 3a to stage 16a, joints form from stage 3a to stage 5, the secondary ossification center forms from stage 8 to stage 14, and the marrow forms from stage 10 to stage 16a. Several investigators have defined developmental features at specific areas but have done so in an isolated fashion15-27.
    The characteristics of the stages described in the current study must be understood in order to interpret molecular studies of tissue formation4,9; harvest tissue for experimental studies; and interpret radiographic, sonographic, and magnetic resonance imaging studies. Articular cartilage development is dependent on (1) interzone formation, (2) resorption of the interzone, (3) interstitial growth of the articular cartilage and the underlying epiphyseal cartilage, and (4) calcification of the lowest zone of articular cartilage at skeletal maturity. Embryologic studies of joint formation clarify not only joint development but also articular cartilage formation and epiphyseal shaping19. There is a close relationship and gradual transition between the articular cartilage and the underlying epiphyseal cartilage. Awareness of this relationship is particularly important when performing experimental studies on articular-cartilage tissue involving dissection of cartilage samples. The articular cartilage-epiphyseal cartilage interface is histologically indistinguishable throughout the period of development. With formation of the cartilage canals, the epiph­yseal cartilage is vascularized but the articular cartilage is not23. It is rare, however, for the cartilage canals to extend all the way to the articular cartilage, and they thus do not define the junction between articular cartilage and epiphyseal cartilage. Epiphyseal-cartilage vascularization with the formation of cartilage canals begins at stage 7, well before formation of the secondary ossification center, although the cartilage canals eventually are the vessel source for formation of secondary-ossificatio­n-center bone17,18,23-25.
    Recent reports have indicated that histologic correlation with molecular mechanisms is not merely theoretical but feasible with current techniques. Among the macromolecules involved in bone development are signaling molecules such as sonic hedgehog, Indian hedgehog8,28­-32, and the Wnt family33; homeobox genes8,34; growth factors and their receptors (fibroblast growth factors35; members of the transforming growth factor-β [TGF-β] superfamily36-38, including bone morphogenetic proteins [BMPs]7,39; and growth and differentiation factors [GDFs] such as GDF-5)40-42; and transcription factors such as Runx2 (Cbfa1)43. Smad proteins also play a role in transmitting bone-morphogenetic-protein signals from the cell surface to the nucleus, where they participate in the transcriptional regulation of the expression of genes involved in cartilage and bone formation43-45.
    Development from the limb-bud stage to a fully dif­ferentiated state occurs in several specific directional areas, ­including proximodistal, anteroposterior, dorsoventral, and left-right (to account for body asymmetry)4,9,10. Sonic and Indian hedgehog molecules are the primary signals responsible for patterning the anterior-posterior limb axes, and fibroblast growth factors play a major role in patterning the proximal-distal axes. Wnt-7a helps to specify the dorsoventral axis of the limb bud, and members of the Wnt family of secreted signaling molecules have been implicated in regulating chondrocyte differentiation. Specifically, Wnt-5a is expressed in the perichondrium; Wnt-5b, in pre-hypertrophic chondrocytes and in the outermost cell layer of the perichondrium; and Wnt-4, in cells of the joint region33. Hox genes encode homeobox-containing transcription factors implicated in specifying positional information along the anterior-posterior limb axes and along the midline axis8. The GDF-5 gene is expressed in the early cartilage condensation, where it promotes cell adhesion; in the perichondrium; and in the joint interzone40-42. It thus has roles in joint and cartilage development, one of which is to restrict joint formation to the appropriate location. Other phenomena involve the expression of type-X collagen by hyper­trophic chondrocytes46 and the need for transcription factor Runx2 (Cbfa1) for osteoblast function43. An extensive interplay of molecular factors is involved, as exemplified by Runx2-Smad interactions during chondrocyte maturation: maximal transcription of the type-X collagen gene in pre-hypertrophic chondrocytes involves the interaction of BMP-stimulated Smads with Runx243. BMPs have multiple developmental roles7. In bone development alone, they help to initiate chemotaxis, mitosis, differentiation into cartilage, and then replacement by bone. Some of the cartilage effect is mediated by their ability to influence the chondrocyte cytoskeleton, which controls internal cell shape and also cell relationships to the extracellular matrix by cell-matrix junctions with intracellular, transcellular, and extracellular domains39.
    The pattern of long-bone and epiphyseal formation is the same in the rabbit as it is in the human and other mammalian species, including the lamb, pig, and cow. In each of these groups, cartilage canals are present in the epiphyses long before the formation of the secondary ossification centers and the physes are fully resorbed at skeletal maturation. Conversely, in the murine species, cartilage canals appear only at the same time as formation of the secondary ossification centers17 and the physes remain open throughout life, long after cessation of growth. Other than these two features, the developmental pattern described in the present study is also accurate for mice and rats. Haines outlined the evolution of epiphyses in relation to endochondral bone formation in several species47.
    There are differences in the timing of development, including the time of maturation, in different epiphyses within the same animal, and differing amounts of growth occur at opposite ends of each long bone40. The timing of epiphyseal development, including growth-plate closure, varies from bone to bone, between different epiphyses in the same bone, and even, on occasion, within the same epiphysis. In the rabbit, physeal tissue persists for a considerable period of time after the major extent of growth has occurred, as indicated by the correlation of histologic and radiographic assessments with growth data48,49. The physiologic fact that physeal growth slows and then stops well before full resorption of the physis occurs must be borne in mind when radiographs or histologic sections are used to assess growth phenomena experimentally. In previous work at our laboratory, a study of New Zealand White rabbits in which standardized radiographic measurements of bone length were made at two-week intervals from two to thirty-four weeks of age, we found that 88% of femoral growth and 87% of tibial growth occurred by twelve weeks of age49. By sixteen weeks, the femur had reached 95% of its adult length and the tibia had reached 94% of its adult length. Growth was most rapid during the first four weeks of life, with gradual slowing between four and eight weeks and even more slowing after eight weeks. Similar phenomena in the growth rate of long bones in the rabbit have also been documented by others50-53. In a companion study, we reported that the distal tibial physis closed well before the proximal tibial physis did; at sixteen weeks of age, the proximal physis was structurally intact whereas the distal physis had been obliterated almost completely, with continuity developing between epiphyseal and metaphyseal vessels54.
    While many of the molecular features controlling cell differentiation, cell patterning, matrix synthesis, and matrix resorption have been defined, many others await detection. There is increasing recognition, however, that simple molecular delineation will be insufficient to explain the level-by-level hierarchy of macromolecular assembly that is so characteristic of bone as an organ55,56. The integration of molecular events is already characterized by the interplay of transcriptional activators and repressors such that a linear one molecule/one function scenario rarely applies55-57. The exquisite pattern of long-bone development, from limb bud to mature organ, occurs in a cascade fashion, with each stage dependent on and guided by what preceded it, a developmental phenomenon referred to as epigenesis. The physicochemical events leading to self-assembly of matrices are reasonably well understood, but the extension of this understanding to biologic self-organization and physiologic function must employ newer chemical and biophysical principles56.
    Gardner ED. Instructional Course Lecture, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. The development and growth of bones and joints. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1963;45: 856-62. 45856  1963 
     
    Ham AW, Cormack DH.Histology. 8th ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1979. 
     
    Schafer EA. General anatomy or histology. In: Schafer EA, Thane GD, editors. Quain’s elements of anatomy. 10th edition, vol l, part II. London: Longmans, Green; 1893. 
     
    Johnson RL,Tabin CJ. Molecular models for vertebrate limb development. Cell,1997;90: 979-90. 90979  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Nelson CE, Morgan BA, Burke AC, Laufer E, DiMambro E, Murtaugh LC, Gonzales E, Tessarollo L, Parada LF,Tabin C. Analysis of Hox gene expression in the chick limb bud. Development,1996;122: 1449-66. 1221449  1996  [PubMed]
     
    Niswander L. Growth factor interactions in limb development. Ann N Y Acad Sci,1996;785: 23-6. 78523  1996  [PubMed]
     
    Reddi AH. Bone morphogenetic proteins: from basic science to clinical applications. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2001;83 Suppl 1 (Pt 1): 1-6. 83 Suppl 1 (Pt 1)1  2001 
     
    St-Jacques B,McMahon AP. Early mouse development: lessons from gene targeting. Curr Opin Genet Dev,1996;6: 439-44. 6439  1996  [PubMed]
     
    Tickle C,Eichele G. Vertebrate limb development. Annu Rev Cell Biol,1994;10: 121-52. 10121  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Levin M. Left-right asymmetry in vertebrate embryogenesis. Bioessays,1997;19: 287-96. 19287  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Edwards JA. The external development of the rabbit and rat embryo. Adv Teratol,1968;3: 239-63. 3239  1968 
     
    Hartman HA. The fetus in experimental teratology. In: Weisbroth SH, Flatt RE, Kraus AL, editors. The biology of the laboratory rabbit. New York: Academic Press; 1974. p 91-153 
     
    Van Beneden É,Julin C. Recherches sur la formation des annexes fœtals chez les Mammifères: Lapin et Cheiroptères. Arch Biol,1884;5: 369-434. 5369  1884 
     
    Rosenberg L. Chemical basis for the histological use of safranin O in the study of articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1971;53: 69-82. 5369  1971  [PubMed]
     
    Shapiro F, Holtrop ME,Glimcher MJ. Organization and cellular biology of the perichondrial ossification groove of Ranvier: a morphological study in rabbits­. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1977;59: 703-23. 59703  1977  [PubMed]
     
    Speer DP. Collagenous architecture of the growth plate and perichondrial ossification groove. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1982;64: 399-407. 64399  1982  [PubMed]
     
    Floyd WE 3rd, Zaleske DJ, Schiller AL, Trahan C,Mankin HJ. Vascular events associated with the appearance of the secondary center of os­sification in the murine distal femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1987;69: 185-90. 69185  1987  [PubMed]
     
    Haines RW. Cartilage canals. J Anat,1933;68: 45-64. 6845  1933  [PubMed]
     
    Haines RW. The development of joints. J Anat,1947;81: 33-55. 8133  1947 
     
    Kalayjian DB,Cooper RR. Osteogenesis of the epiphysis: a light and electron microscopic study. Clin Orthop,1972;85: 242-56. 85242  1972  [PubMed]
     
    Mankin HJ. Localization of tritiated thymidine in articular cartilage of rabbits. I. Growth in immature cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1962;44: 682-8. 44682  1962 
     
    Schenk RK, Wiener J,Spiro D. Fine structural aspects of vascular invasion of the tibial epiphyseal plate of growing rats. Acta Anat,1968;69: 1-17. 691  1968  [PubMed]
     
    Shapiro F. Epiphyseal and physeal cartilage vascularization: a light microscopic and tritiated thymidine autoradiographic study of cartilage canals in newborn and young postnatal rabbit bone. Anat Rec,1998;252: 140-8. 252140  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Wilsman NJ,Van Sickle DC. The relationship of cartilage canals to the initial osteogenesis of secondary centers of ossification. Anat Rec,1970;168: 381-91. 168381  1970  [PubMed]
     
    Kugler JH, Tomlinson A, Wagstaff A,Ward SM. The role of cartilage canals in the formation of secondary centres of ossification. J Anat,1979;129: 493-506. 129493  1979  [PubMed]
     
    Buckwalter JA, Mower D, Ungar R, Schaeffer J,Ginsberg B. Morphometric analysis of chondrocyte hypertrophy. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1986;68: 243-55. 68243  1986  [PubMed]
     
    Hunziker EB, Schenk RK,Cruz-Orive LM. Quantitation of chondrocyte ­performance in growth-plate cartilage during longitudinal bone growth. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1987;69: 162-73.. 69162  1987  [PubMed]
     
    Chuang PT,McMahon AP. Vertebrate Hedgehog signalling modulated by induction of a Hedgehog-binding protein. Nature,1999;397: 617-21. 397617  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Enomoto-Iwamoto M, Nakamura T, Aikawa T, Higuchi Y, Yuasa T, Yama­guchi A, Nohno T, Noji S, Matsuya T, Kurisu K, Koyama E, Pacifici M,Iawamoto M. Hedgehog proteins stimulate chondrogenic cell ­differentiation and cartilage formation. J Bone Miner Res,2000;15: 1659-68. 151659  2000  [PubMed]
     
    McMahon AP. More surprises in the Hedgehog signaling pathway. Cell,2000;100: 185-8. 100185  2000  [PubMed]
     
    St-Jacques B, Hammerschmidt M,McMahon AP. Indian hedgehog signaling regulates proliferation and differentiation of chondrocytes and is essential for bone formation. Genes Dev,1999;13: 2072-86. 132072  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Vortkamp A, Lee K, Lanske B, Segre GV, Kronenberg HM,Tabin CJ. ­Regulation of rate of cartilage differentiation by Indian hedgehog and PTH-related­ protein. Science,1996;273: 613-22. 273613  1996  [PubMed]
     
    Hartmann C,Tabin CJ. Dual roles of WNT signaling during chondrogenesis in the chicken limb. Development,2000;127: 3141-59. 1273141  2000  [PubMed]
     
    Krumlauf R. Hox genes in vertebrate development. Cell,1994;78: 191-201. 78191  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Mason IJ. The ins and outs of fibroblast growth factors. Cell,1994;78: 547-52. 78547  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Heldin CH, Miyazono K,ten Dijke P. TGF-beta signaling from cell membrane to nucleus through SMAD proteins. Nature,1997;390: 465-71. 390465  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Kingsley DM. The TGF-beta superfamily: new members, new receptors, and new genetic tests of function in different organisms. Genes Dev,1994;8: 133-46. 8133  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Massague J. TGF-beta signal transduction. Annu Rev Biochem,1998;67: 753-91. 67753  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Vinall RL,Reddi AH. The effect of BMP on the expression of cytoskeletal ­proteins and its potential relevance. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2001;83 Suppl 1 (Pt 1): 63-9. 83 Suppl 1 (Pt 1)63  2001 
     
    Buxton P, Edwards C, Archer CW,Francis-West P. Growth/differentiation ­factor-5 (GDF-5) and skeletal development. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2001;83 Suppl 1 (Pt 1): 23-30. 83 Suppl 1 (Pt 1)23  2001 
     
    Francis-West PH, Abdelfattah A, Chen P, Allen C, MacPherson S,Luyten FP, Archer CW. Mechanisms of GDF-5 action during skeletal development. Development,1999;126: 1305-15. 1261305  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Storm EE,Kingsley DM. GDF5 coordinates bone and joint formation during digit development. Dev Biol,1999;209: 11-27. 20911  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Leboy PS, Grasso-Knight G, D’Angelo M, Volk SW, Lian SW, Drissi H, Stein GS,Adams SL. Smad-Runx interactions during chondrocyte maturation. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2001;83 Suppl 1 (Pt 1): 15-22. 83 Suppl 1 (Pt 1)15  2001 
     
    Derynck R, Zhang Y,Feng XH. Smads: transcriptional activators of TGF-beta responses. Cell,1998;95: 737-40. 95737  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Wrana JL. Regulation of Smad activity. Cell,2000;100: 189-92.. 100189  2000  [PubMed]
     
    Prockop DJ,Kivirikko KI. Collagens: molecular biology, diseases, and potentials for therapy. Annu Rev Biochem,1995;64: 403-34. 64403  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Haines RW. The evolution of epiphyses and of endochondral bone. Biol Rev,1942;17: 267-91. 17267  1942 
     
    Kaweblum M, Aguilar MC, Blancas E, Kaweblum J, Lehman WB,Grant AD, Strongwater AM. Histological and radiographic determina- tion of the age of physeal closure of the distal femur, proximal tibia and p­roximal fibula of the New Zealand white rabbit. J Orthop Res,1994;12: 747-9. 12747  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Masoud I, Shapiro F, Kent R,Moses A. A longitudinal study of the growth of the New Zealand white rabbit: cumulative and biweekly incremental growth rates for body length, body weight, femoral length and tibial length. J Orthop Res,1986;4: 221-31. 4221  1986  [PubMed]
     
    Khermosh O, Tadmor A, Weissman SL, Michels CH,Chen R. Growth of the femur in the rabbit. Am J Vet Res,1972;33: 1079-82. 331079  1972  [PubMed]
     
    Lowrance EW. Roentgenographic record of skeletal growth in relation to age and body weight of the rabbit; calcaneus and tibia. Growth,1953;17: 183-9. 17183  1953  [PubMed]
     
    Lowrance EW. Roentgenographic record of growth of the femur of the rabbit. Growth,1955;19: 247-56. 19247  1955  [PubMed]
     
    Rudicel S, Lee KE,Pelker RR. Dimensions of the rabbit femur during growth. Am J Vet Res,1985;46: 268-9.. 46268  1985  [PubMed]
     
    Masoud I, Shapiro F,Moses A. Tibial epiphyseal development: a cross-sectiona­l histologic and histomorphometric study in the New Zealand white rabbit. J Orthop Res,1986;4: 212-20. 4212  1986  [PubMed]
     
    Fraser SE,Harland RM. The molecular metamorphosis of experimental embryology. Cell,2000;100: 41-55. 10041  2000  [PubMed]
     
    Kirschner M, Gerhart J,Mitchison T. Molecular "vitalism". Cell,2000;100: 79-88. 10079  2000  [PubMed]
     
    Mannervik M, Nibu Y, Zhang H,Levine M. Transcriptional coregulators ­in developm­ent. Science,1999;284: 606-9. 284606  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Fritz H. Prenatal ossification in rabbits as indicative of fetal maturity. T­eratology,1975;11: 313-9. 11313  1975 
     
    Crary DD,Sawin PB. Morphogenetic studies in the rabbit. VI. Genetic factors influencing the ossification pattern of the limbs. Genetics,1949;34: 508-23. 34508  1949 
     
    Danielson M,Kihlstrom I. Calcification of the rabbit fetal skeleton. Growth,1986;50: 378-84. 50378  1986  [PubMed]
     
    Fukuda S,Matsuoka O. Radiographic studies on maturation process of ­secondary ossification centers in long bones of the Japanese white rabbit. Jikkin Dobutsu,1981;30: 497-­501. Japanese30497  1981 
     
    Heikel HVA. On ossification and growth of certain bones of the rabbit; with a comparison of the skeletal age in the rabbit and in man. Acta Orthop Scand,1959-60;29: 171-84. 29171  1959-60 
     

    Submit a comment

    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-A:The components of the developing end of a long bone. The epiphysis is composed of the articular cartilage (AC), the epiphyseal cartilage (EC), and the physis (growth plate). The secondary ossification center (SOC) forms by the endochondral mechanism within the epiphyseal cartilage. It is completely surrounded in the earlier phases of development by another growth plate, the growth plate of the secondary ossification center (GP-SOC), which is responsible for the circumferential growth of the secondary center.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-B:The major stages in the formation and development of long bones and epiphyses (defined in Table I), from stage 1 to stage 16a.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2:a through f, Photographs illustrating the developing limb bud in the rabbit embryo (stage 1). a and b show portions of the embryo at twelve days. In a, both lower limb buds are seen. In b, a limb bud developing as an outpouching of the side wall is evident. c through f demonstrate the appearance of limb buds at fourteen days. In c, the head and the developing eye are seen (top). The upper and lower limb buds are seen as well. In d, a higher-power view of the lower limb bud shows the elevated apical ectodermal ridge (arrow). e and f, from another embryo, show the apical ectodermal ridge of the upper extremity (solid arrow) and the central constriction in the lower limb bud, which begins the differentiation of the proximal and more distal segments (open arrow).
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-A:Figs. 3-A and 3-B Histologic sections illustrating a portion of the upper limb bud from a twelve-day-old embryo (stage 1). Fig. 3-A Histologic section illustrating the limb bud with undifferentiated mesenchymal cells. The apical ectodermal ridge (arrow) is seen at the tip of the limb bud (toluidine blue, 70).
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-B:Figs. 3-A and 3-B Histologic sections illustrating a portion of the upper limb bud from a twelve-day-old embryo (stage 1). Fig. 3-B A higher-power view of a part of the limb bud shows the cells of the apical ectodermal ridge (arrow) and the closely packed undifferentiated mesenchymal cells within the limb bud (toluidine blue, 180).
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 4:Two upper-extremity phalanges in different stages of development are seen. At right, the outline of the bone is being formed at the stage of mesenchymal condensation (stage 2). At left, the more proximal phalanx shows the pink-staining cellular accumulation that is indicative of the early cartilage model of the developing bone (stage 3). Interzone formation (stage 3a) is illustrated between the two phalanges (toluidine blue, 60).
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 5:a: Photomicrograph showing the cartilage model of a femur from a fifteen-day-old embryo with central chondrocyte hypertrophy occurring in the middle of the developing shaft (stage 3b) (toluidine blue, 75). b: Low-power photomicrograph of the central portion of the humerus at eighteen days. The original cartilage model still persists at either side of the photograph (stage 3), where the matrix stains a deep purple. There is chondrocyte hypertrophy throughout most of the central portion of the shaft (stage 3b). Intramembranous bone formation occurs circumferentially around the middle portion of the area of chondrocyte hypertrophy in the narrowest region (stage 4a). Intramembranous bone is formed by the periosteum, and vessels from the periosteum invade the hypertrophic chondrocyte region (arrow) to begin formation of endochondral bone (stage 5a) (toluidine blue, 25). c: Photomicrograph of the middle region of the humerus of a ­sixteen-day-old embryo. Early intramembranous bone formation is evident above, and the hypertrophic chondrocyte mass is seen below. The outer fibrous layer and the inner osteogenic layer of the periosteum have formed. The inner layer contains osteoblasts, newly woven bone matrix, and blood vessels with red blood cells (seen with the stain as light-blue regions). A thin, ­light-purple-staining lamina of primary intramembranous bone is evident against the underlying hypertrophic chondrocyte region (arrow), but there still has been no invasion of the chondrocyte region by blood ­vessels. The primary center of ossification is partly composed of periosteal intramembranous bone (toluidine blue, 75). d: This photomicrograph of the central region of the humerus of an eighteen-day-old embryo shows further ­development of periosteal intramembranous bone and ­vascular invasion of the central hypertrophic chondrocytes. The periosteal vessel invasion (arrow), which is accompanied by mesenchymal osteoprogenitor cells, will lead shortly to endochondral bone formation on cartilage cores (toluidine blue, 75).
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 6:The chondrocytes immediately beyond the hypertrophic chondrocytes take on a flattened and columnar conformation as the physis forms (white arrows). This photomicrograph of the distal aspect of the humerus of a twenty-one-day-old embryo also illustrates the circumferential perichondrial groove, which begins to form just beyond the hypertrophic cells (curved arrows). The hypertrophic cell region appears to be expanding or bulging outwardly (stage 6) (toluidine blue, ¥75).
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 7:The specific structural features of the physis have developed when it has reached its main position toward the end of the developing bone (stage 6a). This color photomicrograph of the proximal aspect of the tibia of a four-week-old embryo shows the physeal cartilage in red, with adjacent epiphyseal bone (above) and metaphyseal bone (below) in blue. The physeal cartilage is composed of resting, proliferating (columnar), and hypertrophic cell zones (toluidine blue, ¥60).
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 8:Epiphyseal cartilage vascularization develops next (stage 7). This photo­micrograph of the epiphyseal region of the distal part of a metatarsal of a postnatal rabbit shows the metaphyseal bone at the lower part of the photomicrograph and the epiphyseal cartilage at the top. The physis and the perichondrial ossification groove are seen centrally and at left. A perichondrial vessel is seen entering the epiphyseal cartilage, which represents the earliest stages of epiphyseal cartilage vascularization. The vessels in the epiphyseal cartilage are present in what are referred to as cartilage canals (hematoxylin and eosin, 75).
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 9:a through f: Color photomicrographs demonstrating formation of the secondary ossification center, beginning with the earliest development of a spherical collection of hypertrophic chondrocytes in the central epiphyseal cartilage mass and ending with a hemispheric arc of chondrocytes with secondary-center endochondral bone within. These photomicrographs encompass stages 7 and 8 (a) through stage 12 (h). All sections are stained with safranin O-fast green. a and b: Cartilage canals (stage 7), central cartilage hypertrophy (stage 8), and vascular invasion of hypertrophic chondrocytes in a metatarsal at one week (a, 20; b, 50). c: Earliest new-bone formation on cartilage cores (stage 10) (180). d: Spherical arc of ­hypertrophic chondrocytes in the distal aspect of the femur at three days (20). e: Increased endochondral bone formation, with all marrow hematopoietic (stage 10) (25). f: Higher-power view of secondary-ossification-center endochondral bone, with all marrow hematopoietic (50). g: Early transformation of the spherical orientation of hypertrophic chondrocytes to a hemispheric orientation (stage 12) (20). h: Hemispheric orientation of chondrocytes in the proximal aspect of the humerus at two weeks (stage 12) (¥50).
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 10:Drawings outlining the orientation of hypertrophic chondrocytes during formation of the secondary ossification center, from stage 6a (left) to stage 12 (right) (vascularity not shown). GP-SOC = growth plate of secondary ossification center.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 11:Shortly after formation of the hemispherical pattern of the secondary-ossification-center hypertrophic chondrocytes, the epiphyseal cartilage tissue adjacent to the physis completes its endochondral transformation to bone, forming what is referred to as the epiphyseal bone plate (stage 13a). In this photomicrograph, the secondary ossification ­center is above and the metaphyseal bone adjacent to the physis is below. A line of demarcation can be seen between the relatively light-staining epiphyseal cartilage and the slightly darker-staining physeal cartilage.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 12:Maturation of the articular cartilage and formation of the subchondral bone plate (stage 15b) occur in the final stages of epiphyseal development. This photomicrograph of the proximal aspect of the tibia in a six-month-old rabbit shows the tangential layer (top); the transitional and radial layers encompassing most of the articular cartilage structure; the tidemark (arrow); the calcified zone of cartilage, which persists throughout adult life; and the more deeply staining subchondral bone (bottom). Calcification of the lowest zone of the articular cartilage, tidemark formation, and the presence of fatty marrow represent stage 16a (safranin O-fast green, 75).
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE I:  Histologic Stages in Long-Bone and Epiphyseal Development
    *The substages, labeled a and b, refer to events occurring at the same time as a particular stage in different parts of the same bone or to a structurally important continuation of the same process at a slightly later time.
    Stage*Histologic Events
    ?1Limb-bud formation, uniform distribution of mesenchymal cells, and formation of apical ectodermal ridge
    ?2Mesenchymal condensation
    ?3Cartilage differentiation
    ?3aInterzone formation
    ?3bChondrocyte hypertrophy in middle part of long-bone cartilage model
    ?4Epiphyseal shaping
    ?4aFormation of intramembranous periosteal bone at mid-diaphysis (primary center of ossification)
    ?5Resorption of joint interzone and formation of smooth articular cartilage surface
    ?5aVascular invasion of hypertrophic chondrocyte area, endochondral bone formation (mid-diaphysis), and completion of formation of primary center of ossification
    ?6Formation of the physis and of peripheral perichondrial groove tissue
    ?6aFarthest relative extent of epiphyseal/physeal position
    ?7Vascularization of epiphyseal cartilage with formation of cartilage canals
    ?8Central chondrocyte hypertrophy to form spherical mass, development of growth plate completely surrounding secondary ossification center
    ?9Vascular invasion of developing secondary ossification center into hypertrophic chondrocytes adjacent to mineralized cartilage matrix
    10Bone formation and marrow cavitation in secondary ossification center, formation of hematopoietic marrow
    11Increase in size of secondary ossification center, decrease in size of epiphyseal cartilage
    12Central chondrocyte hypertrophy and secondary-ossification-center growth-plate change from spherical to hemi- spherical orientation
    13Fat in marrow, hematopoietic marrow adjacent to secondary-ossification-center growth plate
    13aEpiphyseal bone-plate formation
    14Fullest relative extent of secondary-ossification-center development in epiphyseal cartilage
    15Thinning of physis
    15aInvolution of secondary-ossification-center growth plate
    15bSubchondral bone-plate formation
    16Resorption of physis with linkage of epiphyseal and metaphyseal circulations
    16aCalcification of lowest zone of articular cartilage, tidemark formation, and transformation of all marrow to fat
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE II:  Relationship Between Age and Developmental Stage at Major Long Bones and Their Epiphyses
    *Two separate secondary ossification centers initially form in the proximal part of the humerus. From stages 8 to 15, the developmental stages for the medial center and the lateral center are separated by a slash. Differentiation is not made after fusion into one osseous mass. †Two separate secondary ossification centers initially form in the proximal part of the femur. The developmental stages for the femoral head center and the greater trochanter center are separated by a slash. Differentiation is not made after fusion into one osseous mass. ‡Two separate secondary ossification centers initially form in the proximal part of the tibia. The developmental stages for the main proximal center and the tibial tubercle center are separated by a slash. Differentiation is not made after fusion into one osseous mass. §When two or more stages are identified in the same epiphysis at the same time, the stages are separated by commas.
    AgeHumerusProximal Parts of Radius and UlnaFemurTibiaDistal Part of Metatarsal
    Proximal*MiddleDistalProximal†MiddleDistalProximal‡MiddleDistal
    Prenatal
    12 d11111111
    14 d23222322322
    15 d§3, 3a, 43b3, 3a, 43, 3a, 43, 3a, 43b3, 3a, 43, 3a, 43b3, 3a, 43
    16 d44a4444a444a43a
    18 d6a5a5555a555a54
    21 d76666664
    24 d886a777
    27 d8/8887776a6
    Postnatal
    Newborn9/999/99977
    3-4 d10/999/910107
    1 wk10/10109/91110910
    2 wk12/11121212/1211121210
    4 wk§13/13, 13a/13a13, 13a13a14/1413, 13a14/131414
    6 wk14
    2 mo15/151515/151515/151515
    3 mo§15, 15a, 15b15, 15a, 15b15, 15a, 15b15a15a/15a15a15
    4 mo15b15b/15b15b16
    6 mo1616a16
    8 mo161616161616a16a
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE III:  Time of Formation of Primary and Secondary Ossification Centers in the Rabbit*
    *The times were derived from this study and others58-62. †The postnatal time-periods are underlined. ‡See reference 58.
    Primary Center of Ossification (embryonic time-periods)Secondary Centers of Ossification† (late embryonic and postnatal time-periods)
    Humerus16-18 dProximal: 28-30 d; newbornDistal: 28-30 d; newborn
    Radius18 dProximal: 7 dDistal: 7 d
    Ulna18 dProximal: 3-5 d; 7 dDistal: 3-6 d; 7 d
    MetacarpalsI: 26-27 dII, III: 21-23 dIV: 24 dV: 25 d
    Upper-extremity phalangesAll: 23-29 d (most: 25-28 d)‡
    Femur18 dHead: newborn - 4 d; all by 10 dGreater trochanter: 4 d; all by 15 dDistal: 28 d - 4 d
    Tibia19 dProximal: newborn - 4 dDistal: earliest 4 d; 7 d
    Fibula19 dProximal: 14 dDistal: 7 d
    MetatarsalsII: 25 dIII, IV, V: 23 dDistal: 7 d
    Lower-extremity phalangesNearly all: 25-26 d (range, 24-27 d)‡
    Gardner ED. Instructional Course Lecture, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. The development and growth of bones and joints. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1963;45: 856-62. 45856  1963 
     
    Ham AW, Cormack DH.Histology. 8th ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1979. 
     
    Schafer EA. General anatomy or histology. In: Schafer EA, Thane GD, editors. Quain’s elements of anatomy. 10th edition, vol l, part II. London: Longmans, Green; 1893. 
     
    Johnson RL,Tabin CJ. Molecular models for vertebrate limb development. Cell,1997;90: 979-90. 90979  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Nelson CE, Morgan BA, Burke AC, Laufer E, DiMambro E, Murtaugh LC, Gonzales E, Tessarollo L, Parada LF,Tabin C. Analysis of Hox gene expression in the chick limb bud. Development,1996;122: 1449-66. 1221449  1996  [PubMed]
     
    Niswander L. Growth factor interactions in limb development. Ann N Y Acad Sci,1996;785: 23-6. 78523  1996  [PubMed]
     
    Reddi AH. Bone morphogenetic proteins: from basic science to clinical applications. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2001;83 Suppl 1 (Pt 1): 1-6. 83 Suppl 1 (Pt 1)1  2001 
     
    St-Jacques B,McMahon AP. Early mouse development: lessons from gene targeting. Curr Opin Genet Dev,1996;6: 439-44. 6439  1996  [PubMed]
     
    Tickle C,Eichele G. Vertebrate limb development. Annu Rev Cell Biol,1994;10: 121-52. 10121  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Levin M. Left-right asymmetry in vertebrate embryogenesis. Bioessays,1997;19: 287-96. 19287  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Edwards JA. The external development of the rabbit and rat embryo. Adv Teratol,1968;3: 239-63. 3239  1968 
     
    Hartman HA. The fetus in experimental teratology. In: Weisbroth SH, Flatt RE, Kraus AL, editors. The biology of the laboratory rabbit. New York: Academic Press; 1974. p 91-153 
     
    Van Beneden É,Julin C. Recherches sur la formation des annexes fœtals chez les Mammifères: Lapin et Cheiroptères. Arch Biol,1884;5: 369-434. 5369  1884 
     
    Rosenberg L. Chemical basis for the histological use of safranin O in the study of articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1971;53: 69-82. 5369  1971  [PubMed]
     
    Shapiro F, Holtrop ME,Glimcher MJ. Organization and cellular biology of the perichondrial ossification groove of Ranvier: a morphological study in rabbits­. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1977;59: 703-23. 59703  1977  [PubMed]
     
    Speer DP. Collagenous architecture of the growth plate and perichondrial ossification groove. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1982;64: 399-407. 64399  1982  [PubMed]
     
    Floyd WE 3rd, Zaleske DJ, Schiller AL, Trahan C,Mankin HJ. Vascular events associated with the appearance of the secondary center of os­sification in the murine distal femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1987;69: 185-90. 69185  1987  [PubMed]
     
    Haines RW. Cartilage canals. J Anat,1933;68: 45-64. 6845  1933  [PubMed]
     
    Haines RW. The development of joints. J Anat,1947;81: 33-55. 8133  1947 
     
    Kalayjian DB,Cooper RR. Osteogenesis of the epiphysis: a light and electron microscopic study. Clin Orthop,1972;85: 242-56. 85242  1972  [PubMed]
     
    Mankin HJ. Localization of tritiated thymidine in articular cartilage of rabbits. I. Growth in immature cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1962;44: 682-8. 44682  1962 
     
    Schenk RK, Wiener J,Spiro D. Fine structural aspects of vascular invasion of the tibial epiphyseal plate of growing rats. Acta Anat,1968;69: 1-17. 691  1968  [PubMed]
     
    Shapiro F. Epiphyseal and physeal cartilage vascularization: a light microscopic and tritiated thymidine autoradiographic study of cartilage canals in newborn and young postnatal rabbit bone. Anat Rec,1998;252: 140-8. 252140  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Wilsman NJ,Van Sickle DC. The relationship of cartilage canals to the initial osteogenesis of secondary centers of ossification. Anat Rec,1970;168: 381-91. 168381  1970  [PubMed]
     
    Kugler JH, Tomlinson A, Wagstaff A,Ward SM. The role of cartilage canals in the formation of secondary centres of ossification. J Anat,1979;129: 493-506. 129493  1979  [PubMed]
     
    Buckwalter JA, Mower D, Ungar R, Schaeffer J,Ginsberg B. Morphometric analysis of chondrocyte hypertrophy. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1986;68: 243-55. 68243  1986  [PubMed]
     
    Hunziker EB, Schenk RK,Cruz-Orive LM. Quantitation of chondrocyte ­performance in growth-plate cartilage during longitudinal bone growth. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1987;69: 162-73.. 69162  1987  [PubMed]
     
    Chuang PT,McMahon AP. Vertebrate Hedgehog signalling modulated by induction of a Hedgehog-binding protein. Nature,1999;397: 617-21. 397617  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Enomoto-Iwamoto M, Nakamura T, Aikawa T, Higuchi Y, Yuasa T, Yama­guchi A, Nohno T, Noji S, Matsuya T, Kurisu K, Koyama E, Pacifici M,Iawamoto M. Hedgehog proteins stimulate chondrogenic cell ­differentiation and cartilage formation. J Bone Miner Res,2000;15: 1659-68. 151659  2000  [PubMed]
     
    McMahon AP. More surprises in the Hedgehog signaling pathway. Cell,2000;100: 185-8. 100185  2000  [PubMed]
     
    St-Jacques B, Hammerschmidt M,McMahon AP. Indian hedgehog signaling regulates proliferation and differentiation of chondrocytes and is essential for bone formation. Genes Dev,1999;13: 2072-86. 132072  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Vortkamp A, Lee K, Lanske B, Segre GV, Kronenberg HM,Tabin CJ. ­Regulation of rate of cartilage differentiation by Indian hedgehog and PTH-related­ protein. Science,1996;273: 613-22. 273613  1996  [PubMed]
     
    Hartmann C,Tabin CJ. Dual roles of WNT signaling during chondrogenesis in the chicken limb. Development,2000;127: 3141-59. 1273141  2000  [PubMed]
     
    Krumlauf R. Hox genes in vertebrate development. Cell,1994;78: 191-201. 78191  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Mason IJ. The ins and outs of fibroblast growth factors. Cell,1994;78: 547-52. 78547  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Heldin CH, Miyazono K,ten Dijke P. TGF-beta signaling from cell membrane to nucleus through SMAD proteins. Nature,1997;390: 465-71. 390465  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Kingsley DM. The TGF-beta superfamily: new members, new receptors, and new genetic tests of function in different organisms. Genes Dev,1994;8: 133-46. 8133  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Massague J. TGF-beta signal transduction. Annu Rev Biochem,1998;67: 753-91. 67753  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Vinall RL,Reddi AH. The effect of BMP on the expression of cytoskeletal ­proteins and its potential relevance. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2001;83 Suppl 1 (Pt 1): 63-9. 83 Suppl 1 (Pt 1)63  2001 
     
    Buxton P, Edwards C, Archer CW,Francis-West P. Growth/differentiation ­factor-5 (GDF-5) and skeletal development. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2001;83 Suppl 1 (Pt 1): 23-30. 83 Suppl 1 (Pt 1)23  2001 
     
    Francis-West PH, Abdelfattah A, Chen P, Allen C, MacPherson S,Luyten FP, Archer CW. Mechanisms of GDF-5 action during skeletal development. Development,1999;126: 1305-15. 1261305  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Storm EE,Kingsley DM. GDF5 coordinates bone and joint formation during digit development. Dev Biol,1999;209: 11-27. 20911  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Leboy PS, Grasso-Knight G, D’Angelo M, Volk SW, Lian SW, Drissi H, Stein GS,Adams SL. Smad-Runx interactions during chondrocyte maturation. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2001;83 Suppl 1 (Pt 1): 15-22. 83 Suppl 1 (Pt 1)15  2001 
     
    Derynck R, Zhang Y,Feng XH. Smads: transcriptional activators of TGF-beta responses. Cell,1998;95: 737-40. 95737  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Wrana JL. Regulation of Smad activity. Cell,2000;100: 189-92.. 100189  2000  [PubMed]
     
    Prockop DJ,Kivirikko KI. Collagens: molecular biology, diseases, and potentials for therapy. Annu Rev Biochem,1995;64: 403-34. 64403  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Haines RW. The evolution of epiphyses and of endochondral bone. Biol Rev,1942;17: 267-91. 17267  1942 
     
    Kaweblum M, Aguilar MC, Blancas E, Kaweblum J, Lehman WB,Grant AD, Strongwater AM. Histological and radiographic determina- tion of the age of physeal closure of the distal femur, proximal tibia and p­roximal fibula of the New Zealand white rabbit. J Orthop Res,1994;12: 747-9. 12747  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Masoud I, Shapiro F, Kent R,Moses A. A longitudinal study of the growth of the New Zealand white rabbit: cumulative and biweekly incremental growth rates for body length, body weight, femoral length and tibial length. J Orthop Res,1986;4: 221-31. 4221  1986  [PubMed]
     
    Khermosh O, Tadmor A, Weissman SL, Michels CH,Chen R. Growth of the femur in the rabbit. Am J Vet Res,1972;33: 1079-82. 331079  1972  [PubMed]
     
    Lowrance EW. Roentgenographic record of skeletal growth in relation to age and body weight of the rabbit; calcaneus and tibia. Growth,1953;17: 183-9. 17183  1953  [PubMed]
     
    Lowrance EW. Roentgenographic record of growth of the femur of the rabbit. Growth,1955;19: 247-56. 19247  1955  [PubMed]
     
    Rudicel S, Lee KE,Pelker RR. Dimensions of the rabbit femur during growth. Am J Vet Res,1985;46: 268-9.. 46268  1985  [PubMed]
     
    Masoud I, Shapiro F,Moses A. Tibial epiphyseal development: a cross-sectiona­l histologic and histomorphometric study in the New Zealand white rabbit. J Orthop Res,1986;4: 212-20. 4212  1986  [PubMed]
     
    Fraser SE,Harland RM. The molecular metamorphosis of experimental embryology. Cell,2000;100: 41-55. 10041  2000  [PubMed]
     
    Kirschner M, Gerhart J,Mitchison T. Molecular "vitalism". Cell,2000;100: 79-88. 10079  2000  [PubMed]
     
    Mannervik M, Nibu Y, Zhang H,Levine M. Transcriptional coregulators ­in developm­ent. Science,1999;284: 606-9. 284606  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Fritz H. Prenatal ossification in rabbits as indicative of fetal maturity. T­eratology,1975;11: 313-9. 11313  1975 
     
    Crary DD,Sawin PB. Morphogenetic studies in the rabbit. VI. Genetic factors influencing the ossification pattern of the limbs. Genetics,1949;34: 508-23. 34508  1949 
     
    Danielson M,Kihlstrom I. Calcification of the rabbit fetal skeleton. Growth,1986;50: 378-84. 50378  1986  [PubMed]
     
    Fukuda S,Matsuoka O. Radiographic studies on maturation process of ­secondary ossification centers in long bones of the Japanese white rabbit. Jikkin Dobutsu,1981;30: 497-­501. Japanese30497  1981 
     
    Heikel HVA. On ossification and growth of certain bones of the rabbit; with a comparison of the skeletal age in the rabbit and in man. Acta Orthop Scand,1959-60;29: 171-84. 29171  1959-60 
     
    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    03/22/2012
    IL - Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush
    03/07/2012
    CA - SOAR Medical Group
    01/04/2012
    PA - Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center - Dept. of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation
    05/18/2012
    TX - University of North Texas Health Science Center