0
Scientific Article   |    
Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Delayed Unions and Nonunions of Fractures of the Distal Part of the Humerus
David L. Helfet, MD; Peter Kloen, MD, PhD; Neel Anand, MD; Howard S. Rosen, MD
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  2003; 85:33-40 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

Background: The purpose of the present retrospective study was to evaluate the results of open reduction and internal fixation of delayed unions and nonunions of fractures of the distal part of the humerus.

Methods: Between 1976 and 2001, fifty-two patients with a delayed union (thirteen patients) or nonunion (thirty-nine patients) of the distal part of the humerus were treated with open reduction and internal fixation along with selective elbow joint arthrolysis and bone-grafting. The average time to presentation was eighteen months (range, two to 192 months) after the injury. Thirty-nine of the fifty-two patients had undergone an average of 1.6 previous operations. There were twenty-seven supracondylar, six transcondylar, thirteen intercondylar, two lateral condylar, and four medial condylar delayed unions or nonunions. The average duration of follow-up was thirty-three months (range, three to 198 months).

Results: Fifty-one of the fifty-two patients had healing of the delayed union or nonunion after the index operation; the average time to union was six months (range, two to twenty-four months). The average range of elbow motion increased from 71° preoperatively to 94° postoperatively. Complications included two superficial infections, two deep infections, and five cases of ulnar neuropathy. Fifteen patients (29%) needed additional surgery after the index procedure. Specifically, seven patients underwent removal of prominent hardware; six underwent hardware removal along with excision of heterotopic bone, ulnar neurolysis, and/or manipulation under anesthesia; one underwent irrigation and débridement; and one underwent compartment release.

Conclusions: Open reduction through an extensile exposure and rigid internal fixation consistently results in healing of a delayed union or nonunion of the distal part of the humerus. An improved range of motion of the elbow can be achieved by securing the site of the nonunion and performing aggressive elbow joint arthrolysis and soft-tissue releases in patients with severe contractures.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level IV (case series [no, or historical, control group]). See p. 2 for complete description of levels of evidence.

Figures in this Article
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $30
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

     
    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org
    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    David L. Helfet
    Posted on July 17, 2003
    Re: Distal humeral nonunions-is osteoporosis important to guide the nature of fixation
    Hospital for Special Surgery

    Thank you for your comments.

    Cortical screws are stronger, come in longer sizes, and allow retrograde crossed screw fixation-a big help in obtaining stability. Today, we use Locked Synthes 3.5 Recon Plates which are excellent esp. in osteopaenic bone.

    Did not use adjunctive treatment in this series, but would today.

    Regards David L. Helfet MD

    Vikas Yadav
    Posted on June 26, 2003
    Distal humeral nonunions-is osteoporosis important to guide the nature of fixation
    PGIMS Rohtak

    Dear Editor,

    I read with interest the article "Open reduction and internal fixation of delayed unions and nonunions of fractures of the distal part of the humerus". The authors are to be commended for their excellent description of a complex problem, and especially for providing details of the surgical technique for mobilising the fracture fragments.

    In my experience with such nonunions in Indian patients, osteopenia of the fragments seen in post-menopausal women, the elderly, or secondary to disuse, impaires both fixation and early mobilisation. The authors have correctly stated that the philosophy of rigid internal fixation must be followed, but in the elderly, or postmenopausal patient with a long standing nonunion this may be difficult to achieve with cortical screws as recommended by them. In these situations,I prefer to use 4.0 mm fully threaded cancellous screws and have been able to achieve good fixation using them.

    Since the authors used cortical screws without cement in the majority(48) of their reported cases, it would be of interest to know the incidence of screw/plate cut- out in their series, especially since they used a rigorous post operative rehabilitation program. >P>These comments should not be misconstrued as a criticism of an aggressive rehab program with which I agree, but I am interested in knowing how the described fixation technique withstood the physiotherapy program, especially in patients with osteopenic bone.

    I would also be interested to know whether the authors used any adjuctive medical therapy such as alendronate,etc. concomitantly in the post operative period to improve bone quality.

    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    01/04/2012
    LA - LSU Health Shreveport
    03/22/2012
    IL - Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush
    03/06/2012
    RI - West Bay Orthopaedics and Neurosurgery, Inc.
    05/18/2012
    NY - SUNY-Downstate Medical Center