0
Scientific Articles   |    
Far Cortical Locking Can Reduce Stiffness of Locked Plating Constructs While Retaining Construct Strength
Michael Bottlang, PhD1; Josef Doornink, MS1; Daniel C. Fitzpatrick, MD2; Steven M. Madey, MD1
1 Legacy Biomechanics Laboratory, 1225 N.E. 2nd Avenue, Portland, OR 97215
2 Slocum Center for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, 55 Coburg Road, Eugene, OR 97408
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  2009; 91:1985-1994  doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.01038
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

Background: Several strategies to reduce construct stiffness have been proposed to promote secondary bone healing following fracture fixation with locked bridge plating constructs. However, stiffness reduction is typically gained at the cost of construct strength. In the present study, we tested whether a novel strategy for stiffness reduction, termed far cortical locking, can significantly reduce the stiffness of a locked plating construct while retaining its strength.

Methods: Locked plating constructs and far cortical locking constructs were tested in a diaphyseal bridge plating model of the non-osteoporotic femoral diaphysis to determine construct stiffness in axial compression, torsion, and bending. Subsequently, constructs were dynamically loaded until failure in each loading mode to determine construct strength and failure modes. Finally, failure tests were repeated in a validated model of the osteoporotic femoral diaphysis to determine construct strength and failure modes in a worst-case scenario of bridge plating in osteoporotic bone.

Results: Compared with the locked plating constructs, the initial stiffness of far cortical locking constructs was 88% lower in axial compression (p < 0.001), 58% lower in torsion (p < 0.001), and 29% lower in bending (p < 0.001). Compared with the locked plating constructs, the strength of far cortical locking constructs was 7% lower (p = 0.005) and 16% lower (p < 0.001) under axial compression in the non-osteoporotic and osteoporotic diaphysis, respectively. However, far cortical locking constructs were 54% stronger (p < 0.001) and 9% stronger (p = 0.04) under torsion and 21% stronger (p < 0.001) and 20% stronger (p = 0.02) under bending than locked plating constructs in the non-osteoporotic and osteoporotic diaphysis, respectively. Within the initial stiffness range, far cortical locking constructs generated nearly parallel interfragmentary motion. Locked plating constructs generated significantly less motion at the near cortex adjacent to the plate than at the far cortex (p < 0.01).

Conclusions: Far cortical locking significantly reduces the axial stiffness of a locked plating construct. This gain in flexibility causes only a modest reduction in axial strength and increased torsional and bending strength.

Clinical Relevance: Far cortical locking may provide a novel bridge plating strategy to enhance interfragmentary motion for the promotion of secondary bone healing while retaining sufficient construct strength.

Figures in this Article
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $30
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

     
    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org
    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    Guidelines
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    05/18/2012
    NH - Concord Orthopaedics
    03/06/2012
    RI - West Bay Orthopaedics and Neurosurgery, Inc.
    03/07/2012
    CA - SOAR Medical Group