0
Scientific Articles   |    
A Nonlocking End Screw Can Decrease Fracture Risk Caused by Locked Plating in the Osteoporotic Diaphysis
Michael Bottlang, PhD1; Josef Doornink, MS1; Gregory D. Byrd, MD2; Daniel C. Fitzpatrick, MD3; Steven M. Madey, MD1
1 Legacy Biomechanics Laboratory, 1225 N.E. 2nd Avenue, Portland, OR 97215
2 Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239
3 Slocum Center for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, 55 Coburg Road, Eugene, OR 97408
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  2009; 91:620-627  doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.00408
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

Background: Locking plates transmit load through fixed-angle locking screws instead of relying on plate-to-bone compression. Therefore, locking screws may induce higher stress at the screw-bone interface than that seen with conventional nonlocked plating. This study investigated whether locked plating in osteoporotic diaphyseal bone causes a greater periprosthetic fracture risk than conventional plating because of stress concentrations at the plate end. It further investigated the effect of replacing the locked end screw with a conventional screw on the strength of the fixation construct.

Methods: Three different bridge-plate constructs were applied to a validated surrogate of the osteoporotic femoral diaphysis. Constructs were tested dynamically to failure in bending, torsion, and axial loading to determine failure loads and failure modes. A locked plating construct was compared with a nonlocked conventional plating construct. Subsequently, the outermost locking screw in locked plating constructs was replaced with a conventional screw to reduce stress concentrations at the plate end.

Results: Compared with the conventional plating construct, the locked plating construct was 22% weaker in bending (p = 0.013), comparably strong in torsion (p = 0.05), and 15% stronger in axial compression (p = 0.017). Substituting the locked end screw with a conventional screw increased the construct strength by 40% in bending (p = 0.001) but had no significant effect on construct strength under torsion (p = 0.22) and compressive loading (p = 0.53) compared with the locked plating construct. Under bending, all constructs failed by periprosthetic fracture.

Conclusions: Under bending loads, the focused load transfer of locking plates through fixed-angle screws can increase the periprosthetic fracture risk in the osteoporotic diaphysis compared with conventional plates. Replacing the outermost locking screw with a conventional screw reduced the stress concentration at the plate end and significantly increased the bending strength of the plating construct compared with an all-locked construct (p = 0.001).

Clinical Relevance: For bridge-plating in the osteoporotic diaphysis, the addition of a conventional end screw to a locked plating construct can enhance the bending strength of the fixation construct without compromising construct strength in torsion or axial compression.

Figures in this Article
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $30
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

     
    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org
    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    01/04/2012
    LA - LSU Health Shreveport
    05/18/2012
    NY - SUNY-Downstate Medical Center
    03/06/2012
    RI - West Bay Orthopaedics and Neurosurgery, Inc.
    03/22/2012
    IL - Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush