0
Scientific Articles   |    
Spectrum of Radiographic Femoroacetabular Impingement Morphology in Adolescents and Young Adults: An EOS-Based Double-Cohort Study
Matthew R. Schmitz, MD1; Bernd Bittersohl, MD2; Daniela Zaps, MD2; James D. Bomar, MPH2; Andrew T. Pennock, MD2; Harish S. Hosalkar, MD2
1 San Antonio Military Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas 78234
2 Rady Children’s Hospital San Diego, 15151 Almond Orchard Lane, San Diego, CA 92131. E-mail address for H.S. Hosalkar: hhpedpod@gmail.com
View Disclosures and Other Information
  • Disclosure statement for author(s): PDF

Investigation performed at Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, California



Disclosure: None of the authors received payments or services, either directly or indirectly (i.e., via his or her institution), from a third party in support of any aspect of this work. One or more of the authors, or his or her institution, has had a financial relationship, in the thirty-six months prior to submission of this work, with an entity in the biomedical arena that could be perceived to influence or have the potential to influence what is written in this work. Also, one or more of the authors has had another relationship, or has engaged in another activity, that could be perceived to influence or have the potential to influence what is written in this work. The complete Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest submitted by authors are always provided with the online version of the article.

Copyright © 2013 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2013 Jul 03;95(13):e90 1-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01030
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

Background: 

Symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement is a known prearthritic condition. Impingement morphology is poorly defined in the adolescent population. The purpose of this study was to document the prevalence of radiographic impingement morphology in adolescents with no symptomatic hip problems.

Methods: 

Ninety anteroposterior images of the hip in forty-five consecutive adolescents with scoliosis met the inclusion criteria. Sex distribution was equal. The second cohort (ninety hips) was an age-matched group with no scoliosis. None had symptomatic hip problems. Images were analyzed for coxa profunda, protrusio acetabuli, Tönnis angle, anteroposterior alpha angle, center-edge angle, acetabular crossover, ischial spine sign, and neck-shaft angle.

Results: 

Of the 180 hips, 92.8% demonstrated at least one parameter suggesting impingement morphology, whereas 52.2% showed at least two signs. Evidence of coxa profunda was seen in 81.7% of the hips, while a negative Tönnis angle was seen in 31.1% and a center-edge angle indicative of acetabular overcoverage was seen in 15%. An acetabular crossover sign was detected in 27.2% of the hips, while an abnormal anteroposterior alpha angle was found in 5.6% of the hips in male patients and 6.7% of the hips in female patients. Statistical analysis revealed that abnormal alpha angles (p = 0.029), crossover signs (p = 0.029), and ischial spine signs (p = 0.026) were more common in the cohort without scoliosis, and coxa profunda was more common in females (p = 0.034).

Conclusions: 

There was a high prevalence of radiographic impingement morphology beyond the spectrum of normal in this double-cohort study of adolescents. Femoroacetabular impingement remains a dynamic problem, and we caution against relying only on the use of hard-set static radiographic parameters when evaluating femoroacetabular impingement. This study raises the important question of what morphologic characteristics should be defined as abnormal, when at least one finding of impingement morphology is noted in such a large segment of the population. On the basis of the normative data obtained, reference values for radiographic parameters of femoroacetabular impingement morphology should be redefined. Normal values for a Tönnis angle were between –8° and 14°, the upper limit of the center-edge angle was 44°, and the normal values for femoral neck-shaft angle were between 121° and 144°. Surgical indications should be tailored to physical examination findings and not radiographic findings alone.

Level of Evidence: 

Diagnostic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Figures in this Article
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $35
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

     
    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org

    References

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe





    Related Content
    The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
    JBJS Case Connector
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    JBJS Jobs
    04/02/2014
    W. Virginia - Charleston Area Medical Center
    12/04/2013
    New York - Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    02/28/2014
    District of Columbia (DC) - Children's National Medical Center
    12/31/2013
    S. Carolina - Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Medical Univerity of South Carlonina