Scientific Articles   |    
Determinants of Patient Satisfaction with Outcome After Rotator Cuff Surgery
James D. O'Holleran, MD1; Mininder S. Kocher, MD, MPH2; Marilee P. Horan, BS3; Karen K. Briggs, MPH3; Richard J. Hawkins, MD3
1 Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115
2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115
3 Clinical Research Department, Steadman Hawkins Clinic, Steadman Hawkins Sports Medicine Foundation, 181 West Meadow Drive, Suite 1000, Vail, CO 81657. E-mail address for M.P. Horan: marilee.horan@shsmf.org
View Disclosures and Other Information
The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.
Investigation performed at Steadman Hawkins Research Foundation, Vail, Colorado, and Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2005 Jan 01;87(1):121-126. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.C.01316
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case


Background: The outcome after rotator cuff surgery has been reported frequently with use of condition-specific measures, but patient satisfaction has not been well studied. The purpose of this study was to identify the determinants of patient satisfaction with the outcome after rotator cuff surgery.

Methods: A cohort of 311 patients undergoing rotator cuff surgery was studied prospectively. Two hundred and fifty-four patients had subjective follow-up for a minimum of one year, and fifty-seven patients had subjective and objective follow-up for a minimum of one year. Diagnoses included tendinitis or impingement (eighty patients), a partial-thickness rotator cuff tear (fifty-five patients), and a full-thickness rotator cuff tear (176 patients). The dependent variable was patient satisfaction with the outcome, graded ordinally on a scale of 1 to 10. Independent variables included demographic, surgical, objective follow-up, and subjective follow-up parameters. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the determinants of satisfaction.

Results: Univariate analysis of demographic variables demonstrated no significant differences (p > 0.05) with respect to patient satisfaction. Analysis of the surgical variables showed significantly decreased satisfaction (p < 0.05) for patients who had débridement for a massive, irreparable cuff tear; those who had subscapularis tears; and those with larger supraspinatus and infraspinatus tears. Analysis of the objective variables at follow-up demonstrated significantly decreased satisfaction (p < 0.05) for patients with diminished and weakened forward elevation, impingement signs, and acromioclavicular joint pain and tenderness. Univariate analysis of subjective variables at follow-up showed significantly decreased satisfaction (p < 0.001) for patients with pain, functional difficulty, and work disability.

Multivariate analysis demonstrated significantly decreased satisfaction associated with pain (p < 0.001) and dysfunction (p < 0.05). A significant relationship (p < 0.05) was detected between satisfaction and a willingness to recommend the surgery to another. A significant relationship (p < 0.05) was also found between satisfaction and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score.

Conclusions: Subjective variables of symptoms and function have the most robust associations with patient satisfaction following rotator cuff surgery. Thus, in assessing the outcome of rotator cuff surgery from the perspective of patient satisfaction with outcome, we emphasize the importance of patient-derived subjective assessment of symptoms and function.

Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Figures in this Article
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $35
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org


    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe

    Related Content
    The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
    JBJS Case Connector
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    JBJS Jobs
    Louisiana - Ochsner Health System
    Georgia - Choice Care Occupational Medicine & Orthopaedics
    WV - Charleston Area Medical Center
    OK - The University of Oklahoma