Scientific Articles   |    
Staggered Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Performed Four to Seven Days Apart During a Single Hospitalization
Christopher D. Sliva, MD1; John J. Callaghan, MD1; Devon D. Goetz, MD2; Stephen G. Taylor, MD2
1 Department of Orthopaedics, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242. E-mail address for J.J. Callaghan: john-callaghan@uiowa.edu
2 Des Moines Orthopaedic Surgeons, Des Moines Methodist Hospital, 6001 Westown Parkway, West Des Moines, IA 50266
View Disclosures and Other Information
In support of their research or preparation of this manuscript, one or more of the authors received grants or outside funding from DePuy. None of the authors received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. A commercial entity (DePuy) paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, benefits to a research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.
Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, and Des Moines Methodist Hospital, Des Moines, Iowa

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2005 Mar 01;87(3):508-513. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02193
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case


Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the types and prevalence of complications associated with bilateral total knee replacement performed four to seven days apart during a single hospitalization and to compare them with those associated with bilateral knee replacement performed sequentially under the same anesthetic session or staged unilateral replacements performed during separate hospitalizations.

Methods: Using a computerized database and medical records, we retrospectively evaluated 332 consecutive patients who underwent bilateral total knee replacement performed by two surgeons. A total of 241 patients underwent staggered bilateral knee replacement with the procedures performed four to seven days apart during one hospitalization, twenty-six underwent sequential bilateral total knee replacement, and sixty-five underwent staged bilateral knee replacement performed during two separate hospitalizations. The data on major complications, including death, return to operating room, myocardial infarction, and pulmonary embolism, and on minor complications, including atrial fibrillation, deep-vein thrombosis, and urinary tract infection, were evaluated.

Results: Patients undergoing sequential bilateral total knee replacement and staged bilateral knee replacement had an overall rate of complications that was 2.5 times higher than that of the staggered group. Major complications were rare in all groups, but they occurred most often in the staged bilateral replacement group. The overall rate of complications for the patients who had staggered bilateral knee replacement (13%) was significantly less (p = 0.0009) than that for the patients who had sequential bilateral knee replacement (35%) or staged bilateral knee replacement (31%). The length of inpatient stay for those with staggered total knee arthroplasty was four days longer than that for the sequential arthroplasty group (p = 0.0001).

Conclusions: Staggered bilateral total knee replacement, with the procedures performed four to seven days apart in a single hospitalization, is a safe and practical method for performing bilateral total knee replacement.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Figures in this Article
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $35
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org


    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe

    Robert Poss, MD
    Posted on June 13, 2005
    Editor's Note
    Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

    The corresponding author of this article has been invited to respond to the letter by Dr. Kaper and to date, has not done so.

    Bertrand P Kaper
    Posted on May 16, 2005
    Staggered Bilateral TKA Performed Four to Seven Days Apart During a Single Hospitalization
    Orthopaedic Specialists of Central Arizona

    To the Editor:

    I read with interest the article "Staggered Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Performed Four to Seven Days Apart During a Single Hospitalization", by Sliva et al. The best and safest surgical "timing" for patients presenting with bilateral degenerative joint disease, of essentially equal severity, is and remains a quandry.

    The methodology applied in this study, however, calls into question the validity of the results and conclusions set forth in the article. As was appropriately pointed out, this study represented a retrospective review with "retrospective assignment" of patients to one of the three study groups. First, the large numbers assigned to the "staggered" group, compared to the other two groups(241 vs 65+26), suggests an initial selection bias on the part of the primary surgeons.

    The pre-operative assessment of patients being considered for bilateral TKA's is, as noted, essential. The fact that patients with "substantial cardiac, pulmonary, or other serious" medical comorbidities were deferred to the "staged" group is also a very strong selection bias. Similarly, it is identified that if a patient initially slated for a "staggered" approach developed a problem intra- or post-operatively, that the second TKA was deferred to a later date. No mention is made as to how many patients fell into such a category, nor is it stated whether or not these patients were thereby subsequently included in the "staged" group. If this were to be the case, this would introduce yet another selection bias. If, for example, a patient developed a post-operative cardiac arrhythmia after their first TKA, thereby postponing their scheduled, "staggered", contralateral TKA to a later "staged" date, this would naturally shift a complication out of the "staggered" group and into the "staged" group.

    Furthermore, I was concerned about the length of time elapsed between the first and second TKA in the "staged" group. The average "staging" was 70.5 weeks, with a very wide range from 1.6 weeks to 270.9 weeks. In order to answer the question of the safest and most reliable outcomes for patients needing bilateral TKA's, I am not sure that including patients whose second TKA was done more than one year later (certainly not five years later) allows for accurate comparison. We are all well aware that in our older patients (especially since the "staged" group was noted to be significantly older), their medical circumstance can dramatically change/worsen over a relatively short time span. With such a long time interval between the first and second TKA, it would almost seem that an entirely new assessment of their medical circumstances and co-morbidities would be in order. This was not addressed in this study.

    Finally, the authors conclude that the overall rate of complications in the "sequential" and "staged" groups were 2.5x higher than in the "staggered" group (a statistic quoted directly in the JBJS CME test). Given the relatively small number of major complications, little statistically inference can be made in regard major complications (although the only death and MI occurred in the "staggered" group). The main determinant of the authors' conclusion seems to come from the rate of minor complications. A review of the assigned ASA score may have allowed further insight into exactly the cummulatively differences in overall patient health. The authors did analyze the reimbursement figures- however, what would have been worth further review would have been an analysis of the total cost of each procedure/hospitalization to assess the effect of the reported higher complication rate. Given the fact that the overall length of stay data was not noted to be significantly different in the "staggered" and "staged" (when the two hospitalizations were added together) groups, leads me to believe that the higher reported complication rate did not translate into a more expensive hospitalization or a longer length of stay. The overall clinical outcomes of the patients with regard Knee Society Score, range of motion, or rate of revision was similarly not assessed.

    In summary, the authors are to be commended on their attempts to shed further light onto this difficult question of how bilateral TKA's are best scheduled. I am not sure, however, that their conclusions are based on sound enough methodology to allow clinicians to suggest to patients that "staggering" their TKA's is truly the best and safest approach for this challenge.

    Bertrand P. Kaper, M.D.

    Related Content
    The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
    JBJS Case Connector
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Results provided by:
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    JBJS Jobs
    Massachusetts - The University of Massachusetts Medical School
    Oregon - The Center - Orthopedic and Neurosurgical Care and Research
    Georgia - Choice Care Occupational Medicine & Orthopaedics