Preparation and Characterization of Platelet-Rich Plasma
Sixty-five milliliters of venous blood was drawn from each of six healthy
men ranging in age from twenty-two to thirty-seven years, with a mean age [and
standard error of the mean] of 29.2 ± 2.4 years, after approval was
granted from the institutional review board at the Georgia Institute of
Technology. Platelet-rich plasma was prepared from each donor with use of the
SYMPHONY Platelet Concentrate System (DePuy Spine, Raynham, Massachusetts)
according to the manufacturer's instructions. Two fractions were obtained from
this apparatus: platelet-rich plasma and platelet-poor plasma. The platelet
and growth factor contents in each of these fractions and in the whole blood
from the six donors were evaluated by means of platelet counts (Coulter Cell
Counter, Multisizer II; Beckman Coulter, Miami, Florida) and kit immunoassays
for TGF-ß1 (Quantikine DB100; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota),
PDGF-AA (Quantikine DAA00), PDGF-AB (Quantikine DHD00B), and PDGF-BB
(Quantikine DBB00).
Samples were analyzed before and after platelet activation. After aliquots
of platelet-rich plasma, platelet-poor plasma, and whole blood were removed,
200 µL of each of the fractions was treated with 20 µL of sterile bovine
thrombin prepared by mixing 25 µL of the enzyme (1000 U/mL) in 10 mL of
CaCl2 under sterile conditions. The addition of thrombin to whole
blood elicited clotting. In order to obtain a liquid sample from the whole
blood, mild centrifugation (300 × g) was used to precipitate the clot.
After activation of the samples, levels of active and latent TGF-ß1 as
well as levels of the three isoforms of PDGF were determined.
Formulation of Human Demineralized Bone Matrix
Human demineralized bone matrix particles, prepared for clinical use and
ranging in size from 200 to 500 µm, were obtained as a gift from LifeNet
(Virginia Beach, Virginia). In a previous
study29, we
evaluated the osteoinductivity of twenty-seven batches of demineralized bone
matrix from this tissue bank in the nude-mouse muscle implantation assay, and
from this assortment we selected two batches with moderate osteoinduction
activity. These two batches were designated as demineralized bone matrix-1 and
demineralized bone matrix-2.
Because preparations of demineralized bone matrix, with or without
platelet-rich plasma, are not sufficiently cohesive to be implanted into a
muscle pouch without dispersion, particles were placed into number-5 gelatin
capsules (10 mg of demineralized bone matrix per capsule). The gelatin
capsules were not presterilized, and the demineralized bone matrix was not
weighed and packaged under clean-room conditions. Therefore, all of the
implants were sterilized with ultraviolet light overnight prior to use.
Previous studies have demonstrated that implants sterilized by this means do
not elicit a microbial infection. Importantly, the osteoinductivity of both
batches used in this study was previously determined with the same protocol;
consequently, any negative impact of the sterilization was already accounted
for.
Immediately prior to implantation, 25 µL of platelet-rich plasma was
activated with 2.5 µL of thrombin/calcium chloride and dispensed into a
capsule containing the demineralized bone matrix. The demineralized bone
matrix and platelet-rich plasma were then mixed with the dispensing pipette
tip, and the capsule was implanted. When platelet-rich plasma was implanted
without demineralized bone matrix, the same volume of the preparation was
used. The platelet-rich plasma employed for these experiments was prepared
immediately prior to use.
Implantation Protocol
Inbred male nu/nu mice (nude mice) (Harlan, Indianapolis, Indiana) were
used in this study because the compromised immune system in these animals
permits an evaluation of the response to xenograft implants with minimal
donor-host interactions. Eighty mice were divided into twenty groups of four
mice each (see Appendix). Each batch of demineralized bone matrix was
evaluated by itself and with each of the six different preparations of
platelet-rich plasma. Each preparation of platelet-rich plasma was also
implanted without demineralized bone matrix as a control.
Following administration of inhalation anesthesia with isoflurane, the
implantation sites were disinfected with povidone iodine. One small skin
incision was made over the gastrocnemius muscle in each hindlimb, and a pouch
was prepared by blunt dissection. One gelatin capsule was inserted into each
pouch, and the incision was closed with clips. This protocol was approved by
the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Georgia Institute of
Technology. Each mouse received two identical implants, thereby reducing the
possibility of the cross reactivity that might occur with dissimilar
formulations. As each group comprised four mice and two implants were used in
each animal, the sample size was eight for each treatment group.
Histological Evaluation
Fifty-six days after implantation, the mice were killed by asphyxiation
with carbon dioxide. The whole calf muscles were removed to ensure complete
recovery of the implant site. Following fixation in 10% neutral buffered
formalin, the tissues were decalcified in 5% formic acid and embedded in
paraffin. Three consecutive cross-sectional cuts (3 to 4 µm in thickness)
were made at each of three different levels of the calf muscle to ensure
visualization of residual demineralized bone matrix and any new bone
formation. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and all were
evaluated at 10× magnification for the presence or absence of
demineralized bone matrix particles, ossicle formation, and new bone. One
section from each implant was selected for further analysis. If more than one
section revealed any of these features, the section that had the largest area
of demineralized bone matrix or the most induced new bone was chosen for
measurement. Because the section with the greatest amount of new bone was
evaluated, the results were biased toward success for each formulation.
Each section was evaluated with use of a system for qualitative scoring of
osteoinduction26.
With this system, sections with no evidence of demineralized bone matrix or
new tissue were valued as 0 and not included in any averages. When
demineralized bone matrix was observed but no new bone or cartilage was
present, the value was 1. When an ossicle was observed, the value was 2. When
two or more ossicles were present, the value was 3. In sections with very
osteoinductive implants, with 70% of the slide at 10× magnification
covered with an ossicle, a value of 4 was ascribed. Two independent examiners
evaluated each section with the qualitative scoring system. A third examiner
resolved differences in scoring when the two examiners did not agree; this was
the case for 11.4% of the sections examined.
Histomorphometric analysis with use of a computerized analysis system
(Image-Pro Plus; Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, Maryland) was performed on
the same histologic sections used for qualitative scoring. Areas of the
sections to be measured were captured at the appropriate magnification by a
video camera. Calibration was performed according to the instructions
accompanying the software. The measurements included the ossicle area (as
determined by the marrow space), the new bone area (distinct from
demineralized bone matrix and limb bones), and the total area of residual
demineralized bone matrix particles.
Statistical Analysis
The results of the qualitative and morphometric analyses were calculated as
the means and standard error of the mean for each variable. The values for all
groups represented the findings from two limbs of each of four animals,
providing a sample size of eight. Previous studies demonstrated the validity
of treating each implant (at each of two sites per animal), rather than each
animal, as a
unit29. Significant
differences between groups were determined with analysis of variance and the
use of the Bonferroni modification of the Student t test. For both statistical
tests, p values of =0.05 were considered to be significant. Power
calculations showed that the power ranged between 0.54 and 0.89, depending on
the parameter being measured.
Evaluation of Platelet-Rich Plasma
The SmartPReP system (Harvest Technologies, Plymouth, Massachusetts) used
in this study was effective as a platelet concentrator. The platelet count in
platelet-rich plasma was amplified approximately fourfold when compared with
that in platelet-poor plasma and whole blood (see Appendix). Platelet-rich
plasma was also enriched in growth factors, including both active and latent
TGF-ß1. The active TGF-ß1 content of whole blood was low, but
release of granules following activation of platelets by thrombin more than
doubled the amount of active TGF-ß1 in the platelet-rich plasma
preparation (see Appendix). The amount of latent TGF-ß1 in whole blood
was approximately 150 times greater than the amount of active TGF-ß1, and
it doubled on the release of granules (see Appendix). Similarly, the three
dimeric forms of PDGF were concentrated in platelet-rich plasma prepared with
the SmartPReP apparatus. Comparison of the platelet-rich plasma with the
platelet-poor plasma revealed approximately a sixfold increase in the amount
of of PDGF-BB, a fivefold increase in the amount of PDGF-AA, and a twofold
difference in the amount of PDGF-AB (see Appendix). All of these differences
were significant (p < 0.05). Degranulation by thrombin significantly
increased the amount of each of these PDGFs in the platelet-rich plasma
preparation.
Histological Evaluation
Validation of the Nude-Mouse Muscle Assay
The two batches of demineralized bone matrix used in this study were both
moderately osteoinductive (Fig.
1), with qualitative osteoinductivity scores that were comparable
with those reported
previously29.
Moreover, the qualitative and quantitative results
(Fig. 2) were congruent. These
observations indicate that the assay is valid and that the effects of
platelet-rich plasma (enhancement or inhibition) can be interpreted with
confidence. No evidence of pathological change was observed in any of the
sections. Newly formed bone had a typical histological appearance and could be
differentiated from the implanted bone matrix. The surrounding muscle tissues
were normal, and there was no evidence of fibrosis.
Bone Induction Score
The qualitative osteoinductivity scores are presented in
Figure 1. The values for the
implants in which platelet-rich plasma was used represent the averages from
the six different preparations of platelet-rich plasma (i.e., the plasma from
the six donors). Both batches of demineralized bone matrix implanted without
platelet-rich plasma exhibited moderate osteoinduction. None of the
platelet-rich plasma samples implanted without demineralized bone matrix
elicited any kind of osteoinductive activity. The average score for
demineralized bone matrix-1 implanted with platelet-rich plasma was very
similar to the value for the untreated demineralized bone matrix-1. The
average score for demineralized bone matrix-2 implanted with platelet-rich
plasma was lower than that for the untreated demineralized bone matrix-2.
These qualitative scores suggest that platelet-rich plasma does not enhance
the osteoinductivity of demineralized bone matrix in nude mice and that the
effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma may depend on the properties of the
demineralized bone matrix with which it is used.
Histomorphometric Analysis
The measurements of ossicle and new bone formation are shown in
Figure 2. Again, the values for
the groups in which platelet-rich plasma was used represent the averages of
the values for the six preparations of platelet-rich plasma. Both control
samples of demineralized bone matrix generated new bone in the form of
ossicles. Demineralized bone matrix-2 induced the formation of smaller
ossicles (p < 0.05), although the amount of new bone within the ossicle was
comparable with that found in the ossicles induced by demineralized bone
matrix-1. The addition of platelet-rich plasma reduced the size of the
ossicles induced by both demineralized bone matrix batches, but the effect of
the platelet-rich plasma was significant only when it was used with
demineralized bone matrix-2 (p < 0.05). Moreover, platelet-rich plasma
reduced the amount of new bone within the ossicles induced by demineralized
bone matrix-2 (p < 0.05). These data reinforce the qualitative finding that
platelet-rich plasma does not enhance the osteoinductivity of demineralized
bone matrix in the nude mouse model and suggest that it may reduce
osteoinductivity in a donor-dependent manner.
The areas of residual demineralized bone matrix and platelet-rich
plasma-treated demineralized bone matrix remaining after fifty-six days are
shown in Figure 3. The values
are means of the mean results for each donor. Platelet-rich plasma delayed the
resorption of demineralized bone matrix-2 but did not significantly alter the
amount of demineralized bone matrix-1 present in the harvested tissues. When
the values from the qualitative and quantitative assessments are plotted as
treatment/control ratios (Fig.
4), the impact of platelet-rich plasma on the osteoinductivity of
demineralized bone matrix can be fully appreciated. Platelet-rich plasma had a
more pronounced inhibition effect on demineralized bone matrix-2, but it
affected both bone preparations.
Individual Effects of Platelet-Rich Plasma
Figure 5 presents the scores
for each of the six blood donors in a treatment/control ratio format. In panel
A, the majority of the qualitative scores had a ratio of <1 when
demineralized bone matrix-2 with platelet-rich plasma was used. In contrast,
when demineralized bone matrix-1 with platelet-rich plasma was used, none of
the platelet-rich plasma preparations showed a significant effect, either
positive or negative. In panel B, ossicle formation induced by demineralized
bone matrix-1 and platelet-rich plasma is shown to be comparable with that
induced by demineralized bone matrix-1 alone, but platelet-rich plasma from
donors 2, 4, 5, and 6 significantly decreased the ossicle area induced by
demineralized bone matrix-2. Panel C shows that none of the platelet-rich
plasma preparations were capable of significantly enhancing new bone formation
when implanted with demineralized bone matrix. None of the platelet-rich
plasma preparations significantly reduced the bone formed in response to
demineralized bone matrix-1, but platelet-rich plasma from donors 2, 4, 5, and
6 significantly reduced the new bone formed in response to demineralized bone
matrix-2. Although the two demineralized bone matrix samples differed slightly
with regard to their osteoinductivity, and individual responses to the six
platelet preparations were exhibited, collectively the findings indicate that
platelet-rich plasma does not amplify the osteoinductivity of demineralized
bone matrix in muscle sites of nude mice.
A table showing the study design and figures presenting the specimen
platelet counts and the amounts of active TGF-ß1 and of the three
isomeric forms of PDGF are available with the electronic versions of this
article, on our web site at
(go to
the article citation and click on "Supplementary Material") and on
our quarterly CD-ROM (call our subscription department, at 781-449-9780, to
order the CD-ROM). ?