0
Journal Contents   |    
A Critical Evaluation of a Method of Epiphyseal Stimulation
Earnest B. Carpenter; James B. DaltonJr.
View Disclosures and Other Information
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical College of Virginia, and Crippled Children's Hospital, Richmond
1956 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1956 Oct 01;38(5):1089-1095
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

On the basis of the results obtained by this method of epiphyseal stimulation, it is apparent that while some increase in growth was obtained in twenty-six of the thirty

See Table in the PDF file

patients, the amounts of this increased growth was not sufficient to justify the procedure. However, while it is true that in 70 per cent of the cases, the maximum gain was only one-eighth to one-quarter of an inch, it is also worthy of note that many of the patients were below the age at which a limb-shortening or epiphyseal-arrest procedure could be done. Furthermore, although the gain was negligible, the stimulating procedure did prevent the inequality in length from becoming greater and in several instances it reduced the inequality to a small amount. For this reason the authors feel that this procedure has some merit in a few isolated instances, such as in a child below the age of six with a discrepancy of one and one-half inches or more and with a flail extremity secondary to poliomyelitis. According to the authors' observations, this method of epiphyseal stimulation very possibly will prevent the discrepancy from becoming greater before such time as a growth-arrest or limb-shortening procedure might be indicated. They also believe that in a child with a discrepancy of one inch or more who had to undergo surgical relaxation of a tight iliotibial band, a stimulating procedure can be carried out through the same operative incision with little additional trauma or operative time.

This study has been a disappointment for the results have demonstrated that the use of intramedullary ivory implants in the distal end of the femur and proximal end of the tibia will not produce a sufficient increase in growth to justify the procedure. The authors have been stimulated themselves, however, to further study this problem in the hopes of finding a method of growth stimulation which will have sound clinical application.

Figures in this Article
    This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $35
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

     
    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org

    References

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe





    Related Content
    The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
    JBJS Case Connector
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    Guidelines
    Preventive services for children and adolescents. -Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement
    Results provided by:
    PubMed
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    JBJS Jobs
    02/28/2014
    District of Columbia (DC) - Children's National Medical Center
    12/04/2013
    New York - Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    12/31/2013
    S. Carolina - Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Medical Univerity of South Carlonina
    04/02/2014
    W. Virginia - Charleston Area Medical Center