0
Journal Contents   |    
Idiopathic Scoliosis ANALYSIS OF CURVE PATTERNS AND THE PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF MILWAUKEE- BRACE TREATMENT IN ONE HUNDRED SIXTY-NINE PATIENTS
JOHN H. MOE; DAVID N. KETTLESON
View Disclosures and Other Information
From the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota Health Science Center, Minneapolis
1970 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1970 Dec 01;52(8):1509-1533
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

A retrospective study is reported of 228 major idiopathic curves in 169 patients who had either completed Milwaukee-brace treatment (132) or were wearing the brace at night only during the weaning process (thirty-seven). The data collected and analyzed included the history, initial and final physical findings, roentgenograms of the spinal deformity, and the curves as determined at different evaluation times during and after treatment.

The findings and conclusions were as follows:

1. Major curves occurred in three distinct areas: high thoracic (seventh cervical to the seventh thoracic vertebra), thoracic (third thoracic to the third lumbar vertebra), and lumbar (tenth thoracic to the fifth lumbar vertebra).

2. The median total brace-wearing time was 34.4 months.

3. The best correction was obtained within the first twenty-five months in 97 per cent and within two and one-half years in all patients.

4. The high thoracic curves gave the poorest response; the thoracic and lumbar, the best.

5. The median loss of correction after removal of the brace was 1 per cent in thoracic curves and 5 per cent in lumbar curves.

6. The best response to brace treatment occurred when treatment was begun before the iliac epiphyses were capped.

7. Longer curves corrected best.

8. Only one curve of less than 40 degrees at the start of brace treatment was surgically corrected (the patient was uncooperative).

9. Since small curves treated in a Milwaukee brace may show-little or no final correction, these curves lower the percentage of correction at end-result evaluation. Nonetheless, the correction in these curves should be classified as satisfactory because the curves were not allowed to progress.

10. Some of the larger (45 to 50 degrees) double major curves of the right thoracic left lumbar variety showed no roentgenographic improvement but still demonstrated substantial cosmetic improvement with better balance and lessening of the rib prominence. Thus, the improvement produced by the brace is not necessarily demonstrable in a quantitative fashion. Factors 9 and 10 were not considered in this analysis.

11. Severe deformities in some young patients were kept from progressing or were even improved so that necessary surgery could be safely delayed until a more desirable age for operation was reached.

12. The best results were obtained when there was full cooperation by the patient.

13. Study of a greater number of patients who have completed their Milwaukeebrace treatment program and have been followed long enough to evaluate the final result is necessary.

Figures in this Article
    This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $35
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

     
    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org

    References

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe





    Related Content
    The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
    JBJS Case Connector
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    JBJS Jobs
    11/15/2013
    Louisiana - Ochsner Health System
    12/31/2013
    S. Carolina - Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Medical Univerity of South Carlonina
    05/03/2012
    California - UCLA/OH Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
    03/05/2014
    Oklahoma - The University of Oklahoma