Scientific Articles   |    
Incidence of Displacement After Nondisplaced Distal Radial Fractures in Adults
Kevin M. Roth, MD1; Philip E. Blazar, MD1; Brandon E. Earp, MD1; Roger Han, MD1; Albert Leung, BS1
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (K.M.R., P.E.B., B.E.E., and A.L.) and the Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology (R.H.), Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115.
View Disclosures and Other Information
  • Disclosure statement for author(s): PDF

Investigation performed at the Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

Disclosure: None of the authors received payments or services, either directly or indirectly (i.e., via his or her institution), from a third party in support of any aspect of this work. One or more of the authors, or his or her institution, has had a financial relationship, in the thirty-six months prior to submission of this work, with an entity in the biomedical arena that could be perceived to influence or have the potential to influence what is written in this work. No author has had any other relationships, or has engaged in any other activities, that could be perceived to influence or have the potential to influence what is written in this work. The complete Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest submitted by authors are always provided with the online version of the article.

Copyright © 2013 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2013 Aug 07;95(15):1398-1402. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00460
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case



It is standard practice to closely monitor distal radial fractures treated nonoperatively to ensure that there is no fracture displacement. Patients are often asked to initially return weekly for radiographs. To our knowledge, nondisplaced distal radial fractures in adults have not been specifically evaluated to determine if this level of vigilance is required. If this subset of fractures is unlikely to displace, the cost, radiation exposure, and inconvenience of weekly office visits could be spared.


Using our billing database, we identified 642 closed distal radial fractures among the patients who presented to our institution during the four-year period from the beginning of 2006 to the end of 2009. Radiographs of the injuries were reviewed to identify fractures for which radiographic measurements were within predefined radiographic norms. Only those fractures that were believed to be nondisplaced by all reviewers were classified as nondisplaced for the purposes of this study. Radiographic measurements were made at the time of injury and at the time of fracture union to evaluate for displacement over time. The total number of clinic visits and radiographs that were received were calculated from the longitudinal medical record for each patient.


Eighty-two fractures were identified as nondisplaced. None displaced or required operative intervention. The largest measured difference from injury to fracture union for radial inclination was 3.6° (average 0.8°); for radial height, 2.1 mm (average 0.5 mm); and for palmar tilt, 3.1° (average 1.0°). These numbers are all within the error of measurement.


Nondisplaced distal radial fractures in adults appear to be inherently stable, and it may be appropriate to treat this subset of distal radial fractures with cast immobilization (when swelling allows) and a single follow-up visit with radiographs to document union at the time of cast removal.

Level of Evidence: 

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Figures in this Article
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $35
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org


    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe

    Related Content
    The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
    JBJS Case Connector
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    JBJS Jobs
    Illinois - Hinsdale Orthopaedics
    Oregon - The Center - Orthopedic and Neurosurgical Care and Research
    Connecticut - Yale University School of Medicine