Orthopaedic surgeons care for people of all ages and races, and both sexes. With this privilege comes the obligation to understand differences in musculoskeletal health associated with age, sex, and race.
Although age-based differences are frequently studied across all medical specialties, sex and race-based differences are studied less. In 2001, an Institute of Medicine (IOM) report1 concluded that “…there are striking differences in human disease that are not explained at this time. Being male or female…affects health and illness…sex should be considered when designing and analyzing studies in all areas…of…research.” A report on sex differences in musculoskeletal health in JBJS in 20052 concluded that “sex-based differences in cell biology, tissue function, and disease presentation and management [have] the potential to affect how orthopaedic surgeons manage their patients” and called for the orthopaedic community to monitor sex differences for all diseases that affect both sexes, to analyze results of studies by sex, and to promote research on sex differences. Disparities in health between people of different races have been well documented. Although these are often attributed to socioeconomic inequality, a 2006 JBJS study of people who underwent total knee arthroplasty demonstrated few differences among income groups but significantly lower rates of knee replacements among minority groups3.
In 2012, another IOM report4 noted that underreporting of sex differences persists and recommended better alignment of the policies of funding agencies, researchers, and editors; an assumption that sex differences exist in all topics of study so that adequate power for subgroup analysis is inherent in the study design; and the identification of an inability to identify sex differences or similarities as a limitation of the study. A 2012 IOM update on health disparities noted that “…health disparities have persisted over time…people of color experience an earlier onset and a greater severity of negative health outcomes.”5
Sex and race are important variables in musculoskeletal health and health care. JBJS is an important source of information for orthopaedic surgeons and researchers, and is the gold standard in peer-reviewed scientific information in our field. A search for JBJS articles over the past ten years that mentioned sex in the title yielded nineteen articles. Only three articles mentioned race in the title. Undoubtedly many studies mentioned these in the text, but they were rarely the main topic of the study. Certainly it is challenging to accrue enough subjects to study these variables. Still, it seems that we could do better.
National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding policy mandates the inclusion of women and minority groups in clinical research as appropriate. Some journals have specific policies requiring authors to report sex-specific or race-specific data. Others, including JBJS, follow the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors: “Because the relevance of such variables as age, sex, or ethnicity is not always known at the time of study design, researchers should aim for inclusion of representative populations into all study types and at a minimum provide descriptive data for these and other relevant demographic variables.”6
Certainly in orthopaedic surgery, there remain striking differences in disease that are not explained at this time. It seems likely that some of these differences are related to sex or race. On behalf of our patients, researchers should consider potential sex and race differences when planning, performing, analyzing, and submitting their research to JBJS for publication; reviewers and editors should take this into account when evaluating manuscripts, and our readers should expect articles published in JBJS to include this information.