Articles   |    
The fate of cancellous and cortical bone after transplantation of fresh and frozen tissue-antigen-matched and mismatched osteochondral allografts in dogs
S Stevenson; XQ Li; B Martin
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1991 Sep 01;73(8):1143-1156
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case


After implantation, a massive osteochondral allograft cannot be completely protected from the stresses that are produced by weight-bearing, and it is susceptible to collapse during incorporation, revascularization, and substitution. How these processes are affected by disparities between the tissue antigens of the host and the graft remain unclear. To clarify the role of histocompatibility antigen-matching in the incorporation of cancellous and cortical bone, we orthotopically implanted both fresh and cryopreserved dog leukocyte-antigen-matched and mismatched proximal osteochondral radial allografts in beagles. Four groups of beagle dogs were used; they received (1) a dog leukocyte-antigen-mismatched frozen allograft, (2) a dog leukocyte-antigen-mismatched fresh allograft, (3) a dog leukocyte-antigen-matched fresh allograft, or (4) a dog leukocyte-antigen-matched frozen allograft. In twelve dogs, a sham operation was done in the contralateral limb (the first living donor had a sham operation), and in the remaining ten dogs, the proximal part of the contralateral radius was removed and then replaced as an autogenous (control) graft. The animals were given fluorochromes periodically, and they were killed eleven months after the operation. The osseous portion of the grafts was evaluated radiographically, biomechanically, and histomorphometrically. No dog had grossly obvious clinical abnormalities, all host-graft interfaces healed, and no joints dislocated. Radiographic examination of the allografts frequently showed deformation of the radial head and variable peripheral resorption. No significant difference in the modulus of elasticity at the host-graft interface was found among the groups. The repair process of the cortical bone was similar for all grafted segments. New periosteal and endosteal bone formed, and the cortical bone became porotic as vessels penetrated it. The uptake of fluorochrome was the most active in the autogenous grafts and the least active in the fresh antigen-mismatched grafts. The volume of cancellous bone was significantly greater and the trabeculae were thicker in all allografts compared with the bones on which a sham operation had been done and compared with the autogenous grafts. The volume of intertrabecular fibrous connective tissue was directly proportional to the immunogenicity of the allografts, and the percentage of the surface on which bone was forming tended to be inversely proportional to the immunogenicity of the allografts. The grafts were revascularized by the ingrowth of vessels into the intertrabecular spaces; necrotic trabeculae were not penetrated by vessels. This pattern was particularly pronounced in the antigen-mismatched grafts, regardless of whether they were fresh or frozen.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Figures in this Article
    This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $35
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org


    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe

    Related Content
    The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
    JBJS Case Connector
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    JBJS Jobs
    MA - Boston University Orthopedic Surgical Associates
    DC - Children's National Medical Center
    LA - Ochsner Health System