Articles   |    
Aspiration of the Hip Joint before Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. Clinical and Laboratory Factors Influencing Attainment of a Positive Culture*
View Disclosures and Other Information
Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1996 May 01;78(5):749-54
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case


The value of routine aspiration of the hip joint before revision of a hip arthroplasty remains controversial. We reviewed the results of such aspirations in an attempt to determine clinical or laboratory factors that could help the surgeon to identify hips that are infected and that should be aspirated preoperatively.One hundred and fifty consecutive revision total hip arthroplasties were performed by one of us. Preoperative aspiration was not performed or data were excluded for eight hips; no fluid was obtained from one of these hips (0.7 per cent of the 150). Of the remaining 142 hips, 128 had preoperative aspiration once and fourteen, twice. Twenty-one (15 per cent) of the 142 hips were infected, as demonstrated by the intraoperative culture. The intraoperative culture for two of these hips, however, was considered to be false-positive. The initial aspiration was considered to be positive only if an organism grew on the solid medium or if grossly purulent fluid was obtained. The initial aspiration was positive for nineteen hips; on culture of specimens from one hip, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron grew in the liquid medium only; and purulent fluid was obtained from one hip but no organisms grew on culture. Fourteen aspirations were repeated for various reasons, most commonly to confirm the presence of an unusual organism. The repeat aspiration did not change the diagnosis for these hips. When the two hips with a false-positive intraoperative culture were excluded, preoperative aspiration had a sensitivity of 92 per cent, a specificity of 97 per cent, and an accuracy of 96 per cent.Seventeen of the nineteen truly infected hips were associated with an abnormally elevated erythrocyte-sedimentation rate (mean, 80.8 millimeters per hour). However, fifty-eight (50 per cent) of the 116 hips that were not infected, and for which the results were available, also had an abnormally elevated erythrocyte-sedimentation rate (mean, 32.0 millimeters per hour). This difference was significant (p = 0.001, Fisher exact test). The peripheral leukocyte count was not helpful in predicting infection. Hips in which the implants had been in situ for more than five years were less likely to be infected (p = 0.008, Fisher exact test) than those in which the implants had been in situ for five years or less. None of the infected hips in which the implants had been in situ for more than five years were associated with a normal erythrocyte-sedimentation rate.In this study, preoperative aspiration of the hip joint had an excellent sensitivity and specificity with regard to the prediction of infection. On the basis of our findings, we now favor a selective approach to aspiration, as determined by the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and the amount of time that the implant has been in situ.

Figures in this Article
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $35
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org


    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe

    Related Content
    The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
    JBJS Case Connector
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    JBJS Jobs
    Louisiana - Ochsner Health System
    Ohio - OhioHealth Research and Innovation Institute (OHRI)