0
Articles   |    
The Patient-Specific Index: Asking Patients What They Want*†
JAMES G. WRIGHT, M.D., M.P.H., F.R.C.S.(C)‡; NANCY L. YOUNG, B.SC.P.T., M.SC.‡, TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA
View Disclosures and Other Information
Investigation performed at the Departments of Surgery, Physical Therapy, Clinical Epidemiology, Preventive Medicine, and Biostatistics, University of Toronto, Toronto
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1997 Jul 01;79(7):974-83
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

The Patient-Specific Index is used to assess the outcome of total hip arthroplasty by evaluating the preferences of the individual patient. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of this index and to compare different methods of combining patients' ratings of the severity and importance of their complaints, to obtain Patient-Specific Index summary scores.All patients who were scheduled to have a total hip arthroplasty performed by one surgeon at a single institution were eligible for the study. The patients completed the Harris hip score form, the McMaster-Toronto Arthritis (MACTAR) Patient Preference Disability Questionnaire, the Short Form-36, the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and the Patient-Specific Index. With use of the Patient-Specific Index, patients rated the severity and importance of each complaint. These ratings were summed in four different ways to derive severity-importance scores. The questionnaires were completed twice (two weeks apart) before the total hip arthroplasty and twice (two weeks apart) six months after the total hip arthroplasty by a subset of the patients.The seventy-eight participating patients had a mean age of 62.2 years (range, twenty-five to eighty-seven years) at the time of the operation. Forty-three patients (55 per cent) were men, and sixty-three (81 per cent) had osteoarthrosis. The inter-rater and intra-rater test-retest random-effects intraclass correlation coefficients of the Patient-Specific Index were 0.77 or greater (greater than 0.75 is considered excellent). Construct validity was shown by correlations of the Patient-Specific Index with other scales. The additive versions of the Patient-Specific Index (with a responsiveness statistic of 3.3 or greater and a standardized response mean of 1.6 or greater) were more responsive than the other scales.We concluded that the Patient-Specific Index is reliable, valid, and responsive. The additive versions were the most responsive and are recommended for future applications. Such indices need to be tested in studies of patients who have osteoarthrosis of the hip and other musculoskeletal diseases, to ensure generalizability of the results.

Figures in this Article
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $35
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

     
    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org

    References

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe





    Related Content
    The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
    JBJS Case Connector
    Topic Collections
    Hip
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    JBJS Jobs
    01/08/2014
    Pennsylvania - Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
    04/16/2014
    Ohio - OhioHealth Research and Innovation Institute (OHRI)
    05/03/2012
    California - UCLA/OH Department of Orthopaedic Surgery