0
Articles   |    
Total Hip Arthroplasty with Use of an Acetabular Reinforcement Ring in Patients Who Have Congenital Dysplasia of the Hip. Results at Five to Fifteen Years*
THOMAS J. GILL, M.D.†; JOHN B. SLEDGE, M.D.‡; MAURICE E. MÜLLER, M.D.§, BERN, SWITZERLAND
View Disclosures and Other Information
Investigation performed at Maurice E. Müller Institute, Bern
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1998 Jul 01;80(7):969-79
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

The purpose of our study was to examine the clinical and technical problems associated with reconstruction of the hip in patients who had congenital dysplasia and to offer recommendations for their solution.We reviewed the records on 123 consecutive total hip arthroplasties that had been performed by one of us (M. E. M.), between 1981 and 1986, for the treatment of coxarthrosis due to congenital dysplasia of the hip. A minimum of five years of follow-up was required for inclusion in the study. The study group consisted of seventy patients who had had a total of eighty-seven reconstructions. According to the classification of Crowe et al., eleven hips had type-IV acetabular dysplasia; sixty-five, type-III; and eleven, type-II. Acetabular reconstruction was performed with use of the Müller acetabular roof-reinforcement ring and a polyethylene cup, which was inserted with cement. Autologous graft from the femoral head was used in forty-two hips. Femoral reconstruction was performed with use of the Müller straight-stem component for congenital dysplasia of the hip in eighty hips and with use of a standard Müller straight-stem component in seven hips.At an average of 9.4 years (range, five to fifteen years) postoperatively, the result was described as excellent for sixty hips (69 per cent), as good for twenty-three (26 per cent), as fair for two (2 per cent), and as poor for two. Nine (10 per cent) of the hips had been revised. One revision had been performed because of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component; one, because of aseptic loosening of the femoral component; one, because of aseptic loosening of both components; and six, because of infection. Of the unrevised hips, three had had superior migration of the acetabular component of less than five millimeters, and mild protrusio had developed in one. Two hips had a continuous radiolucent line around the acetabular construct. Two hips had had subsidence of the femoral stem of less than three millimeters; one had a complete, non-progressive radiolucent line at the bone-cement interface; and four had a radiolucent line at the proximal part of the bone-cement interface. Six hips had evidence of endosteal osteolysis. Six hips had grade-III or IV heterotopic ossification according to the system of Brooker et al.These results compare favorably with others in the literature. We recommend restoration of the anatomical hip center with the use of an acetabular roof-reinforcement ring and a polyethylene cup inserted with cement for the reconstruction of a deficient acetabulum. The acetabular reinforcement ring prevents resorption of bone graft and migration of the cup, which are major causes of failure of the cup in patients who have had a reconstruction of a deficient acetabulum. Bone graft should be used medially and superiorly as needed to augment bone stock notably. Cement should not be used to fill acetabular defects as we believe that it contributes to aseptic loosening.

Figures in this Article
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $35
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

     
    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org

    References

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe





    Related Content
    The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
    JBJS Case Connector
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    JBJS Jobs
    04/02/2014
    W. Virginia - Charleston Area Medical Center
    02/28/2014
    District of Columbia (DC) - Children's National Medical Center
    12/31/2013
    S. Carolina - Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Medical Univerity of South Carlonina
    12/04/2013
    New York - Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai