Articles   |    
The Effects of Surface Roughness and Polymethylmethacrylate Precoating on the Radiographic and Clinical Results of the Iowa Hip Prosthesis. A Study of Patients Less Than Fifty Years Old*
View Disclosures and Other Information
Investigation performed at the Iowa Methodist Medical Center, West Des Moines, and the University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1999 Apr 01;81(4):481-92
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case


Background: The purpose of the present study was to compare the results associated with two different surface finishes (bead-blasted and grit-blasted) for Iowa femoral components used in total hip arthroplasties performed between January 1979 and June 1991 in patients who were less than fifty years old.Methods: Between January 1979 and December 1985, thirty-six primary total hip replacements were performed in twenty-five patients with insertion of a bead-blasted Iowa femoral component (average surface roughness, 0.8 micrometer) with cement and insertion of a titanium-backed acetabular component (thirty-five hips) or non-metal-backed acetabular component (one hip) with cement. Between January 1986 and June 1991, forty-five primary total hip replacements were performed in thirty-seven patients with use of a precoated grit-blasted Iowa femoral component (average surface roughness, 2.1 micrometers) and a Harris-Galante-I porous ingrowth acetabular component (forty-one hips) or an Osteonics component (four hips). The only change in the design of the femoral component (other than the surface finish) between the two consecutive series was the addition of polymethylmethacrylate precoating to the proximal third of all forty-five grit-blasted stems and modularity of the femoral head of the last eight grit-blasted stems.Results: No hip was lost to follow-up. The duration of radiographic follow-up of the hips treated with the bead-blasted component averaged 11.3 years (range, ten to sixteen years) postoperatively, whereas that of the hips treated with the precoated grit-blasted component averaged 8.2 years (range, five to eleven years). Two (6 percent) of the bead-blasted femoral components were revised because of aseptic loosening compared with eight (18 percent) of the precoated grit-blasted components. Four bead-blasted components (11 percent) were either radiographically loose or were revised because of loosening compared with eleven precoated grit-blasted components (24 percent). Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves evaluated with log-rank analysis revealed that the bead-blasted Iowa femoral components were revised because of aseptic loosening (p = 0.0184) and were radiographically loose (p = 0.0068) less often than the precoated grit-blasted Iowa femoral components.Conclusions: The findings of the present study have led the senior ones of us to resume using femoral components with a polished surface and fixed with cement.

Figures in this Article
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $35
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org


    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe

    Related Content
    The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
    JBJS Case Connector
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    JBJS Jobs
    Massachusetts - The University of Massachusetts Medical School
    Louisiana - Ochsner Health System