Articles   |    
Efficacy of Prophylaxis Against Thromboembolism with Intermittent Pneumatic Compression After Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty*
View Disclosures and Other Information
Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1999 May 01;81(5):690-6
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case


Background: Thromboembolism is a common and important complication after total hip arthroplasty. A variety of pharmacological and mechanical measures have been proposed for prophylaxis. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression as prophylaxis against thromboembolism following total hip arthroplasty.Methods: The prospective study involved a consecutive series of 425 patients in whom a total of 502 (324 primary and 178 revision) total hip arthroplasties had been performed by two surgeons. The patients were managed intraoperatively and postoperatively with use of thigh-high elastic compression stockings and thigh-high intermittent pneumatic compression sleeves. Experienced vascular technologists performed venous duplex ultrasonography on both lower extremities of all patients at a mean of six days (range, two to fifteen days) postoperatively. All patients were followed for at least one year in order to detect late thromboembolism.Results: An asymptomatic deep-vein thrombosis was noted on the scans made after twenty-three (4.6 percent) of the 502 procedures. Nineteen (3.8 percent) of the arthroplasties were followed by the development of a proximal thrombosis and four (0.8 percent), a distal thrombosis. Nineteen of the thromboses were ipsilateral (eighteen were proximal and one, distal), and four were contralateral (one was proximal and three, distal). No symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis developed in the hospital. In addition, three (two proximal and one distal) symptomatic ipsilateral deep-vein thromboses (a prevalence of 0.6 percent) developed three to twenty-three weeks after postoperative scans revealed negative findings and the patients were discharged from the hospital. Three symptomatic pulmonary embolisms (a prevalence of 0.6 percent) were confirmed by ventilation-perfusion scanning while the patients were in the hospital. There were no symptomatic pulmonary embolisms after discharge, and there were no fatal pulmonary embolisms. With the numbers available, we were unable to detect an association between deep-vein thrombosis and age (p = 0.76), gender (p = 0.13), body-mass index (p = 0.12), type of arthroplasty (primary or revision) (p = 0.12), operative approach (p = 0.37), duration of the operation (p = 0.21), type of anesthesia (general or regional) (p = 0.51), units of blood transfused (autologous, p = 0.79; homologous, p = 0.57), blood type (p = 0.18), or the presence of a so-called classic risk factor for the development of thrombosis (p = 0.22). Five arthroplasties (1.0 percent) were followed by the development of a wound hematoma, but only one hematoma necessitated operative drainage.Conclusions: The use of intraoperative and postoperative thigh-high intermittent pneumatic compression, combined with duplex ultrasonography performed by experienced vascular technologists, is effective for prophylaxis against thromboembolism after both primary and revision total hip arthroplasties. The low prevalence of deep-vein thrombosis (4.6 percent) and symptomatic pulmonary embolism (0.6 percent) is comparable with that associated with pharmacological prophylaxis.

Figures in this Article
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $35
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org


    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe

    Related Content
    The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
    JBJS Case Connector
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Guidelines on use of vena cava filters. -British Committee for Standards in Haematology | 9/25/2009
    Guidelines on the use and monitoring of heparin. -British Committee for Standards in Haematology | 9/25/2009
    Results provided by:
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    JBJS Jobs
    Massachusetts - The University of Massachusetts Medical School
    Louisiana - Ochsner Health System