0
Articles   |    
Total Knee Arthroplasty with Retention of Both Cruciate Ligaments. A Nine to Eleven-Year Follow-up Study*
J.-M. CLOUTIER, M.D., F.R.C.S.(C)†; P. SABOURET, M.D., C.S.P.Q.†; A. DEGHRAR, M.D.†, MONTRÉAL, QUÉBEC, CANADA
View Disclosures and Other Information
Investigation performed at Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Campus Saint-Luc, Montréal
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1999 May 01;81(5):697-702
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

Background: Although many early designs of total knee arthroplasty allowed the retention of both cruciate ligaments, in most current designs of knee replacement systems, either both cruciate ligaments are removed or the posterior cruciate ligament alone is retained. This report is a review of a series of total knee arthroplasties in which both cruciate ligaments were retained.Methods: The results of 163 total knee arthroplasties (130 patients) in which both cruciate ligaments were retained were assessed prospectively. One hundred and seven knees (eighty-nine patients) were followed for an average of ten years. There were thirty-four men and ninety-six women, and the average age at the time of the index arthroplasty was sixty-seven years (range, forty-two to eighty-four years). The diagnosis was osteoarthritis in 122 (75 percent) of the knees and rheumatoid arthritis in forty-one (25 percent). Twenty-six knees had a valgus deformity, 109 had a varus deformity, and twenty-eight had a normal alignment of 5 to 10 degrees of valgus. The anterior cruciate ligament was relatively normal in ninety-six knees and was partly degenerated in sixty-seven knees.With use of the rating system of the Knee Society, all 163 knees were prospectively evaluated at yearly intervals; fifty-six of these knees (in forty-one patients) were followed in this manner until the patient died or was lost to follow-up.Results: One hundred and four (97 percent) of the 107 knees available for study at an average of ten years had an excellent or good result. At the time of the latest follow-up, pain was adequately relieved in ninety-seven knees (91 percent) and the average range of flexion was 107 ± 12.6 degrees (range, 65 to 135 degrees). Ninety-five knees (89 percent) had normal anteroposterior stability (less than five millimeters of movement in this plane), and twelve knees (11 percent) had five to ten millimeters of movement as demonstrated by the drawer sign. Ninety-six knees (90 percent) had normal mediolateral stability, and eleven (10 percent) had 5 to 10 degrees of laxity. Ninety-four knees (88 percent) had valgus alignment of 5 to 10 degrees. The average knee score was 91 ± 8.4 points (range, 54 to 100 points), and the average functional score was 82 ± 21 (range, 10 to 100 points). The survival rate at ten years, with revision as the end point, was 95 ± 2.0 percent.Seven (4 percent) of the 163 knees in this series were revised. There were no revisions for patellar problems or aseptic loosening of the tibial component.Conclusions: The good anteroposterior stability in this series after an average follow-up period of ten years indicates that both the anterior and the posterior cruciate ligaments, even when partly degenerated, remain functional when they are preserved in a total knee arthroplasty.

Figures in this Article
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $35
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

     
    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org

    References

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
    JBJS Case Connector
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    03/05/2013
    California - Desert Orthopedic Center
    04/09/2013
    Pennsylvania - Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
    05/01/2013
    Texas - University of Texas Health Science Center @ San Antonio