0
Articles   |    
Idiopathic Adhesive Capsulitis A Prospective Functional Outcome Study of Nonoperative Treatment*
Sean M. Griggs, M.D.†; Anthony Ahn, M.D.‡; Andrew Green, M.D.§
View Disclosures and Other Information
Investigation performed at the Shoulder Service, Brown University School of Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
*No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. No funds were received in support of this study.
†Houston Hand and Upper Extremity Center, 1200 Binz Street, Suite 1200, Houston, Texas 77004.
‡Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Joint Diseases, 301 East 17th Street, New York, N.Y. 10003-3804.
§University Orthopedics, 2 Dudley Street, Suite 200, Providence, Rhode Island 02905. E-mail address: andrew_green_md@brown.edu.

J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2000 Oct 01;82(10):1398-1398
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

Background: Idiopathic adhesive capsulitis is a commonly recognized but poorly understood cause of a painful and stiff shoulder. Although most orthopaedic literature supports treatment with physical therapy and stretching exercises, some studies have demonstrated late pain and functional deficits. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with idiopathic adhesive capsulitis who were treated with a stretching-exercise program.

Methods: Seventy-five consecutive patients (seventy-seven shoulders) with phase-II idiopathic adhesive capsulitis were treated with use of a specific four-direction shoulder-stretching exercise program and evaluated prospectively. The initial evaluation included the recording of a detailed medical and orthopaedic history and assessment of pain, range of motion, and function. The outcome evaluation included assessment of pain, range of motion, and function; completion of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire; and completion of the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey. The mean duration of follow-up was twenty-two months (range, twelve to forty-one months). One patient died prior to the final evaluation, and three patients were lost to follow-up.

Results: Sixty-four (90 percent) of the patients reported a satisfactory outcome. Seven (10 percent) were not satisfied with the outcome, and five (7 percent) underwent manipulation and/or arthroscopic capsular release. The outcomes of the patients who did not have manipulation or capsular release were evaluated. There were significant improvements in the scores for pain at rest (from a mean of 1.57 points before treatment to a mean of 1.16 points at the final evaluation; p < 0.001) and pain with activity (from a mean of 4.12 points before treatment to a mean of 1.33 points at the final evaluation; p < 0.0001). On the average, active forward elevation increased 43 degrees, active external rotation increased 25 degrees, passive internal rotation increased eight vertebral levels, and the glenohumeral rotation arc at 90 degrees of abduction increased 72 degrees (p < 0.00001). The number of "yes" responses to the Simple Shoulder Test increased from a mean of 4.1 (of a possible twelve) to a mean of 10.75 (p < 0.00001). Despite the significant improvements and the high rate of patient satisfaction, there were still significant differences in the pain and motion of the affected shoulder when compared with those of the unaffected, contralateral shoulder (p < 0.00001).

At the final outcome evaluation, the DASH scores demonstrated limitations when compared with known population norms, whereas the profiles of the SF-36 were comparable with those of age and gender-matched control populations.

Prior treatment with physical therapy and a Workers' Compensation claim or pending litigation were the only variables that were associated with the eventual need for manipulation or capsular release. Male gender and diabetes mellitus were associated with worse motion at the final evaluation. Patients with a greater severity of pain with activity at the initial evaluation had significantly lower DASH scores at the final evaluation, and patients with lower initial scores on the Simple Shoulder Test had comparatively lower scores on the Simple Shoulder Test at the outcome evaluation.

Conclusions: The vast majority of patients who have phase-II idiopathic adhesive capsulitis can be successfully treated with a specific four-direction shoulder-stretching exercise program. Although measurable limitations and deficiencies were noted at the outcome evaluation, these appeared to be acceptable to most of the patients and did not affect their general health status. Patients with more severe pain and functional limitations before treatment had relatively worse outcomes. More aggressive treatment such as manipulation or capsular release was rarely necessary, and the efficacy of early use of these treatments should be further studied.

Figures in this Article
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $35
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

     
    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org

    References

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe





    Related Content
    The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
    JBJS Case Connector
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Guidelines
    Results provided by:
    PubMed
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    JBJS Jobs
    03/19/2014
    VA - VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER
    11/15/2013
    LA - Ochsner Health System
    04/02/2014
    IL - Hinsdale Orthopaedics
    04/16/2014
    GA - Choice Care Occupational Medicine & Orthopaedics