0
Scientific Article   |    
Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of Four Knee Outcome Scales for Athletic Patients
Robert G. Marx, MD, MSc, FRCS(C); Edward C. Jones, MD, MA; Answorth A. Allen, MD; David W. Altchek, MD; Stephen J. O'Brien, MD; Scott A. Rodeo, MD; Riley J. Williams, MD; Russell F. Warren, MD; Thomas L. Wickiewicz, MD
View Disclosures and Other Information
Investigation performed at the Center for Clinical Outcome Research and the Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
Robert G. Marx, MD, MSc, FRCS(C)
Edward C. Jones, MD, MA
Answorth A. Allen, MD
David W. Altchek, MD
Stephen J. O’Brien, MD
Scott A. Rodeo, MD
Riley J. Williams, MD
Russell F. Warren, MD
Thomas L. Wickiewicz, MD
Center for Clinical Outcome Research (R.G.M. and E.C.J.) and Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service (R.G.M., A.A.A., D.W.A., S.J.O’B., S.A.R., R.J.W., R.F.W., and T.L.W.), Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021. E-mail address for Dr. Marx: marxr@hss.edu

No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. No funds were received in support of this study. Dr. Marx was supported by an American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Health Services Research Fellowship and a Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada Detweiler Travelling Fellowship.

J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2001 Oct 01;83(10):1459-1469
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

Background: Many patient-based knee-rating scales are available for the evaluation of athletic patients. However, there is little information on the measurement properties of these instruments and therefore no evidence to support the use of one questionnaire rather than another. The goal of the present study was to determine the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of four knee-rating scales commonly used for the evaluation of athletic patients: the Lysholm scale, the subjective components of the Cincinnati knee-rating system, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons sports knee-rating scale, and the Activities of Daily Living scale of the Knee Outcome Survey.

Methods: All patients in the study had a disorder of the knee and were active in sports (a Tegner score of 4 points). Forty-one patients who had a knee disorder that had stabilized and who were not receiving treatment were administered all four questionnaires at baseline and again at a mean of 5.2 days (range, two to fourteen days) later to test reliability. Forty-two patients were administered the scales at baseline and at a minimum of three months after treatment to test responsiveness. The responses of 133 patients at baseline were studied to test construct validity.

Results: The reliability was high for all scales, with the intraclass correlation coefficient ranging from 0.88 to 0.95. As for construct validity, the correlations among the knee scales ranged from 0.70 to 0.85 and those between the knee scales and the physical component scale of the Short Form-36 (SF-36) and the patient and clinician severity ratings ranged from 0.59 to 0.77. Responsiveness, measured with the standardized response mean, ranged from 0.8 for the Cincinnati knee-rating system to 1.1 for the Activities of Daily Living scale.

Conclusions: All four scales satisfied our criteria for reliability, validity, and responsiveness, and all are acceptable for use in clinical research.

Figures in this Article
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $35
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

     
    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org

    References

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe





    Related Content
    The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
    JBJS Case Connector
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    JBJS Jobs
    01/08/2014
    Pennsylvania - Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
    02/05/2014
    Oregon - The Center - Orthopedic and Neurosurgical Care and Research
    01/22/2014
    Pennsylvania - Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
    04/16/2014
    Ohio - OhioHealth Research and Innovation Institute (OHRI)