0
Articles   |    
Six-Pin Halo Fixation and the Resulting Prevalence of Pin-Site Complications
Jeffrey A. Nemeth, CO; L. George Mattingly, CO
View Disclosures and Other Information
Investigation performed at the Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
Jeffrey A. Nemeth, CO 1515 East Florence Boulevard, Suite 107, Casa Grande, AZ 85222. E-mail address: jeffnemeth@home.com
L. George Mattingly, CO 4445 North 7th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85014
No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. No funds were received in support of this study.

J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2001 Mar 01;83(3):377-377
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

Background: In spite of the many advances in halo application technique, the prevalence of complications associated with the use of halo fixation remains high, particularly at the pin sites. Many practitioners do not use more than four pins for halo application in adults because they believe that it increases the risk of complications. The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of six pins in halo application, in order to determine if the extra pins increased fixation strength without increasing the overall pin-site complication rate.

Methods: The first part of our study consisted of force-deflection tests conducted on models of the skull fitted with either a four or a six-pin halo to determine if the six-pin halo provided greater fixation strength. Each skull model was placed in a servocontrolled hydraulic test machine; an axial distraction force was then applied until failure occurred. The second part of the study was a retrospective analysis of sixty-three patient records to document the prevalence of pin-site complications in patients treated with a six-pin halo system; these findings were then compared with established complication rates associated with four-pin halos.

Results: In the force-deflection tests, the mean load to failure of the six-pin halo construct (2879 N [647 lb]) showed the system to be significantly stronger (p = 0.0033) than the four-pin halo construct (1681 N [378 lb]). Of the sixty-three patient records reviewed, five (8% [95% confidence interval, 1% to 15%]) revealed pin-loosening; no infection was recorded for these five patients. One of the sixty-three patients had redness and erythema at "multiple sites," but these areas healed well. Another presented with infection at all six sites; this was recorded as an allergic reaction.

Conclusions: Six-pin halo fixation results in greater halo strength and cervical spine stabilization without increasing the risk of pin-site complications.

Clinical Relevance: Our findings are relevant for current clinical practice as the high complication rates associated with halo application have deterred some practitioners from using this type of fixation. The use of six pins, along with an improved protocol for halo application and care, may contribute to a more successful treatment outcome with fewer complications.

Figures in this Article
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $35
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

     
    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org

    References

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe





    Related Content
    The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
    JBJS Case Connector
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    JBJS Jobs
    06/29/2012
    PA - Thomas Jefferson University
    02/19/2014
    OH - University Hospitals Case Medical Center