0
Articles   |    
Use of the Swanson Silicone Trapezium Implant for Treatment of Primary Osteoarthritis Long-Term Results
Henk G.J. van Cappelle, MD; Robert Deutman, PhD, DMD; Jim R. van Horn, PhD, DMD
View Disclosures and Other Information
Investigation performed at the Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
Henk G.J. van Cappelle, MD
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gelre Hospitals, Location Het Spittaal, Post Office 9020, 7200 GZ Zutphen, The Netherlands. E-mail address: h.vcapelle@spittaal.nl

Robert Deutman, PhD, MD
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Martini Hospital, Post Office 30033, 9700 RM Groningen, The Netherlands

Jim R. van Horn, PhD, MD
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Groningen, Post Office 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands

No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. No funds have been received in support of this study.

J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2001 Jul 01;83(7):999-1004
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

Background: Instability of the prosthesis and silicone-induced synovitis have led most surgeons to abandon use of the Swanson trapezium implant for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis. However, the literature contains little information on the results of long-term follow-up. The present study was conducted to establish the long-term results and to highlight the problems associated with the implant.

Methods: Thirty-five patients (forty-five implants) of our initial forty-five patients (fifty-seven implants) were available for clinical review. The mean duration of follow-up was 13.8 years. The objective result was assessed with a 40-point clinical scoring system. The subjective result was measured with a visual analog scale. A clinical score of 30 to 40 points and a subjective score of 8, 9, or 10 points were considered a good-to-excellent result. Radiographs were evaluated to determine the position and deformation of the prosthesis and to check for osteolytic changes of the bone, indicating silicone-induced synovitis.

Results: The overall clinical and subjective results were good for twenty-seven thumbs (60%). Eighteen thumbs (40%) had a dislocation, and nine of them had a revision. Three more revisions were carried out because of silicone-induced synovitis, persistent pain after reflex sympathetic dystrophy, and deep infection in one thumb each. Revision surgery consisted of resection of the implant, with or without tendon interposition, or implantation of a new prosthesis. Of the thirty-two prostheses (thirty that had not been revised and two that had been revised) for which follow-up radiographs were available, six (19%) showed wear and deformation and five (16%) also were associated with osteolytic changes.

Conclusions: The main problem associated with the prosthesis was dislocation. Surgical measures to improve stability did not prevent this complication. The results after revision because of dislocation were no better than those associated with unrevised dislocated implants. In addition to dislocation, radiographic signs of silicone-induced synovitis were frequently noted, although they did not necessarily lead to a poor result. We concluded that the results after long-term follow-up of the Swanson silicone trapezium implant for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis were poor and that our decision to stop using this implant in 1991 was correct.

Figures in this Article
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $35
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

     
    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org

    References

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe





    Related Content
    The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
    JBJS Case Connector
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    JBJS Jobs
    06/29/2012
    PA - Thomas Jefferson University
    11/15/2013
    LA - Ochsner Health System
    03/19/2014
    VA - VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER
    04/02/2014
    IL - Hinsdale Orthopaedics