Scientific Article   |    
Determining Humeral Retroversion with Computed Tomography
P. Hernigou, MD; F. Duparc, MD; A. Hernigou, MD
View Disclosures and Other Information
Investigation performed at H�pital Henri Mondor, Creteil, France

P. Hernigou, MD
Service d'Orthop�die et de Traumatologie, Universit� Paris XII, H�pital Henri Mondor, 51, avenue du Mal. de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010 Creteil, France

F. Duparc, MD
Service d'Orthop�die, H�pital Charles Nicolle, 1, rue de Germont, 76031 Rouen, France

A. Hernigou, MD
Service d'Imagerie, H�pital Europeen Georges Pompidou, 20, rue Leblanc, 75908 Paris, Cedex 15, France

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2002 Oct 01;84(10):1753-1762
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case


Background: The purpose of this study was to develop and standardize a technique in which computed tomography images are used to determine the humeral torsion angle with landmarks that can be used during surgery.

Methods: One hundred and twenty cadaveric humeri were studied. The retroversion of these anatomical specimens was measured on a computed tomography scan and compared with the direct measurements of the specimens. The retroversion of the humerus was measured by determining the orientation of the proximal articular surface of the humerus with respect to the transepicondylar line of the distal part of the humerus and the forearm axis. To evaluate this method of measuring retroversion, the protocol was tested in patients before and after shoulder arthroplasty.

Results: The degree of reproducibility of the measurements made on the computed tomography scan was evaluated by determining the interclass correlation coefficient. The interclass correlation coefficient was considered good (between 0.85 and 0.90) for the measurements of the normal humeri when the orientation of the articular surface measured in the distal part of the humeral head, the epicondylar axis, and the ulnar axis were used as references. There was a significant difference (p < 0.01) between the mean angular orientation of the proximal articular surface with respect to the epicondylar axis (17.6°) and the mean angular orientation of the proximal articular surface with respect to a line perpendicular to the forearm axis (28.8°). Despite a wide variation in the humeral torsion angle among the specimens from the different cadavera, the angle varied little between the two normal humeri of the same individual (mean side-to-side difference, 2.1°).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that retroversion of the proximal part of the humerus can be reliably measured with computed tomography.

Clinical Relevance: Determining retroversion with computed tomography is more accurate than palpating the epicondylar axis or using the forearm as a goniometer during surgery. Computed tomography is useful for measuring the amount of rotation of humeri with a malunited fracture or severe arthritic deformity.

Figures in this Article
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $35
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org


    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe

    Related Content
    The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
    JBJS Case Connector
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    JBJS Jobs
    Georgia - Choice Care Occupational Medicine & Orthopaedics
    Louisiana - Ochsner Health System
    IL - The University of Chicago's Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine
    CT - Orthopaedic Foundation