Scientific Article   |    
Effect of Baseline Functional Status and Pain on Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty
Jeremy Holtzman, MD, MS; Khal Saleh, MD; Robert Kane, MD
View Disclosures and Other Information
Investigation performed at the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota

Jeremy Holtzman, MD, MS
Robert Kane, MD
Clinical Outcomes Research Center, Division of Health Services Research and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, D-351 Mayo (Mailcode 197), 420 Delaware Street S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455

Khal Saleh, MD
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Mailcode 492, 420 Delaware Street S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455

In support of their research or preparation of this manuscript, one or more of the authors received grants or outside funding from Agency for Health Care Policy Research (AHCPR, now AHRQ) grant #R01-HS09735-02 and by HCFA contract #500-90-004. None of the authors received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2002 Nov 01;84(11):1942-1948
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case


Background: It is unknown whether there is an optimal time for surgery-that is, whether waiting until a patient has greater disability results in a worse outcome. We examined the effect of baseline status on the outcome of total hip arthroplasty to determine if such a relationship existed.

Methods: All Medicare patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis in twelve states were identified by the fiscal intermediary beginning in October 1994 and continuing for approximately eight months; 1640 eligible patients were identified. Consenting patients were surveyed within two months after the procedure and again at twelve months after the procedure, and their medical records were reviewed. The baseline survey, completed by 1120 patients, included items regarding the level of activity, the presence and severity of pain with walking, the need for assistance for walking, the distance that the patient could walk, and whether the patient could perform Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs). Data on comorbid diagnoses were collected from the medical records.

Results: Patients with pain during walking at baseline were more likely to have pain at one year than those without pain at baseline (21% compared with 9%; p < 0.05). Patients who needed assistance with walking at baseline were more likely to need assistance at one year than those who did not need assistance at baseline (38% compared with 15%; p < 0.01). Similar results were seen with regard to the need for assistance with housework (39% compared with 18%; p < 0.01) and grocery shopping (37% compared with 14%; p < 0.01) and, to a lesser extent, for overall participation in moderate activity (17% compared with 10%; p < 0.01). These results persisted after controlling for comorbidities in a multiple regression equation. However, the worse a patient's preoperative status, the more he or she gained in all four measures (p < 0.01).

Conclusions: The findings of the present study suggest that the worse a patient's preoperative status, the more he or she may benefit from total hip arthroplasty. However, our findings also suggest that patients who have a worse preoperative status may not have as good an outcome as those who have a better preoperative status. Patients and physicians should consider these findings when discussing the timing of total hip arthroplasty.

Figures in this Article
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $35
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org


    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe

    Related Content
    The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
    JBJS Case Connector
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    JBJS Jobs
    NY - Columbia University Medical Ctr/Dept of Ortho.Surg
    MA - UMass Memorial Medical Center
    DC - Children's National Medical Center