0
Scientific Article   |    
Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Second-Generation Cementless Total Hip Prosthesis in Patients Younger Than Fifty Years of Age
Young-Hoo Kim, MD; S.-H. Oh, MD; J.-S Kim, MD
View Disclosures and Other Information
Investigation performed at The Joint Replacement Center of Korea, Seoul, Korea

Young-Hoo Kim, MD
S.-H. Oh, MD
J.-S. Kim, MD
The Joint Replacement Center of Korea, affiliated with HaeMin General Hospital, 627-3, JaYang1-Dong, KwangJin-Gu, Seoul 143-191, Korea. E-mail address: younghookim@netsgo.com

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2003 Jan 01;85(1):109-114
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

Background: The early experience with cementless total hip replacement led to design modifications to increase the initial press-fit and stability of the femoral component, to reduce the diameter of the femoral head, and to improve the acetabular component, including the locking mechanism of the shell and the quality of the polyethylene liner. We performed a prospective study to assess the results in young patients who had been followed for a minimum of eight years after treatment with a primary total hip arthroplasty with a second-generation cementless prosthesis.

Methods: Eighty patients (118 hips) were included in the study. There were fifty-eight men and twenty-two women; the mean age at the time of the operation was 46.8 years (range, twenty-one to forty-nine years). We used a cementless Duraloc series-100 or 1200 acetabular component with or without screw fixation, a polyethylene liner with a 22-mm inner diameter, and a cementless Profile femoral component in all hips. The average duration of follow-up was 9.8 years (range, eight to eleven years). Clinical follow-up (with use of the Harris hip score) and radiographic follow-up were performed at six weeks; at three, six, and twelve months; and yearly thereafter. Linear and volumetric wear were measured, and bone-remodeling and osteolysis were assessed.

Results: The average Harris hip score improved from 48.8 points preoperatively to 92 points at the final follow-up examination. The prevalence of transitory thigh pain was 10% (twelve of 118 hips). There was no aseptic loosening. One hip was revised because of recurrent dislocation. The average amount of linear wear was 1.18 mm, and the average wear rate was 0.12 mm/yr. Fourteen hips (12%) had osteolysis in the calcar femorale and eleven hips (9%) had acetabular osteolysis, but all of the osteolytic lesions were <1 cm 2 .

Conclusions: The mechanical fixation of the anatomic fit cementless Profile stem was excellent in this study of young patients who were particularly difficult to treat because of a high prevalence of osteonecrosis and developmental dysplasia. Although there was no aseptic loosening of the components and a relatively low prevalence of osteolysis, there was a high rate of linear wear of the polyethylene liner.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level IV (case series [no, or historical, control group]). See p. 2 for complete description of levels of evidence.

Figures in this Article
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $35
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

     
    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org

    References

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe





    Related Content
    The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
    JBJS Case Connector
    Topic Collections
    Hip
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    JBJS Jobs
    11/15/2013
    Louisiana - Ochsner Health System
    03/19/2014
    Massachusetts - The University of Massachusetts Medical School
    05/03/2012
    California - UCLA/OH Department of Orthopaedic Surgery