0
Selected Instructional Course Lecture   |    
Diagnosis and Management of Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures
Alexander R. Vaccaro, MD1; David H. Kim, MD2; Darrel S. Brodke, MD3; Mitchel Harris, MD4; Jens Chapman, MD5; Thomas Schildhauer, MD5; M.L. Chip Routt, MD6; Rick C. Sasso, MD7
1 Rothman Institute, 925 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107. E-mail address: alexvaccaro3@aol.com
2 The Boston Spine Group, 125 Parker Hill Avenue, Boston, MA 02120
3 University of Utah, 30 North 1900 East, 3B165, Salt Lake City, UT 84132
4 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1070
5 Orthopaedic Services, Harborview Medical Center, 325 North Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104
6 Chirurgische Klinik und Poliklïnïk, BG-Kliniken Bergmannsheil, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, Bochum D-47789, Germany
7 Indiana Spine Group, 8402 Harcourt Road, Suite 400, Indianapolis, IN 46260-2074
View Disclosures and Other Information
The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.
An Instructional Course Lecture, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2003 Dec 01;85(12):2456-2470
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Extract

Management of thoracolumbar and sacral spinal fractures is one of the most controversial areas in modern spinal surgery. Early fusion with instrumentation is a generally accepted treatment method for patients with clearly unstable injuries and a complete neurological deficit; it results in more rapid mobilization, fewer complications due to prolonged recumbency, and lower medical costs. The optimal treatment for patients with mild-to-moderate deformity, an incomplete neurological deficit, and residual spinal canal compromise remains largely unknown. A review of the literature revealed a wide range of conflicting results and recommendations, and the vast majority of the clinical studies can be criticized on the basis of retrospective design, heterogeneous patient populations and treatment strategies, limited follow-up, and poorly defined outcome measures.
Figures in this Article

    First Page Preview

    View Large
    />
    First page PDF preview
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $35
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

     
    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org

    References

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe





    Alexander R. Vaccaro
    Posted on February 11, 2004
    Dr. Vaccaro responds:
    Rothman Institute and Thomas Jefferson University

    To the Editor:

    I greatly appreciate Dr. Amaravati's interest in our article, “Diagnosis and Management of Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures" which was intended to be an educational overview of the contemporary management of thoracolumbar spine fractures in the adult patient.

    It is clear that we are in need of a comprehensive classification system for thoracolumbar spine fractures that will allow us to easily communicate the characteristics of a fracture, confer an understanding of the mechanism of injury,and assist in formulating principles of treatment.

    The McCormack load sharing classification is a theoretical classification system that stresses the importance of the anterior spinal column in regards to fracture stability and predicts the efficacy of a solitary posterior surgical approach in relationship to the degree of fracture comminution (1). This system is not comprehensive. The Gertzbein description of the AO fracture classification is a three part system with multiple subtypes (2). Due to the complexity of the subtypes of this system, a complete and thorough description of a fracture is rarely performed beyond the major description of the injury. A less than optimal intra and interobserver reliability has been determined for this system when it was used to subclassify thoracolumbar fractures.

    The Denis Anatomic Classification System is still popular among North American surgeons because it includes the major types of thoracolumbar fractures and generally assists in guiding treatment(3). Most clinicians understand that if the middle column is injured, great vigilance is required to determine if significant instability exists. We have come to understand that if the posterior osteoligamentous complex is significantly disrupted, especially at the thoracolumabr junction, this is often an indicator of instability and more aggressive treatment i.e. surgery may be necessary.

    The Ferguson and Allen Classification System is a mechanistic classification system and is also very useful in describing a thoracolumbar fracture.(4) It is less popular than the Denis classification system in North America but does have merit if one simply wants to describe a fracture and its proposed mechanism to a colleague.

    Your second question on how to manage a fracture dislocation at the L5-S1 level is also interesting because it is often unnecessary and not optimal to attempt to rigidly stabilize this injury multiple segments above or below the lumbosacral junction. In this fracture a posterior open reduction is first performed followed by placement of an interbody spacer at the L5-S1 disk space for interbody support. Internal fixation is usually placed from L5 to S1 or possibly from L4 to S1. Some surgeons have recommended two points of fixation in the sacrum including a combination sacral ala screw and a S1 pedicle screw or a S2 ala screw and a S1 pedicle screw. We do not recommend iliac screw placement due to the fact that this would span the uninjured sacral iliac joint.

    Your final question is in regards to contemporary thinking regarding short segment fixation. We, again, do not recommend short segment fixation at the thoracolumbar junction in the setting of significant anterior column comminution. Some surgeons recommend this as only a temporary stabilization strategy until healing occurs. Following healing, the internal fixation can be removed to avoid potential implant failure. This, unfortunately, requires a second operation. In a comminuted fracture at the thoracolumbar junction, we often recommend fixation two levels above and two levels below the fracture if a posterior approach is chosen. In fractures of the lower lumbar region such as a burst fracture of L4 or L5 that requires surgical intervention, short segment fixation is routinely used due to the anatomy of this region, i.e. lordosis. The lordotic alignment of this spinal region places less stress on the anterior column and multiple fixation points segments above and below a lower lumbar fracture would significantly decrease the amount of remaining lumbar spinal motion. The potential for loss of lumbar lordosis is also present with multiple levels of fixation in this region of the lumbar spine.

    Sincerely,

    Alexander R. Vaccaro, M.D. AV/lmy

    References

    (1)McCormack T.: Karaicovic, E, Gaines R.W.: The Load Sharing Classification of Spine Fractures. Spine 1994. 19:1741-1744.

    (2)Gerzbein SD: Spine Update: Classification of thoracic and lumbar fractrures. Spine 1994, 79:626-628.

    (3)Denis F: the three column spine and its significance in the classification of actute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine. 1983;8:817- 31.

    (4)Ferguson RL, Allen BL Jr.. A mechanistic classification of thoracolumbar spine fractures. Clin. Orthop. 1984;189:77-88.

    Rajkumar S Amaravati
    Posted on January 31, 2004
    diagnosis and management of thoracolumbar spine fractures
    Department of orthopedics, St.john's medical college and hospital, Bangalore-34, India

    To the Editor:

    I am writing with regard to the Instructional course lecture “Diagnosis & management of Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures”, by Alexander R. Vaccaro et al. This is a good article, however there are few points which I feel the authors could clarify.

    1. The classification of spinal injuries proposed are by Gertzbein (mechanism of injury and morphology )(1) , McCormack (load sharing ) (2) or Denis (anatomical) and Ferguson and Allen (mechanical). Which of these will be more useful practically in assessing and managing the patients.

    The authors have mentioned that fracture dislocations are secondary to complex shearing forces and can occur anywhere along the thoracolumbar spine. They are unstable and need extensive fusion procedures spanning three levels cephalad to the injury level and two or three levels caudad to it. I would pose to them a hypothetical question: if a fracture dislocation occurs at L5-S1, how would they propose to stabilize and fix it.

    The authors have mentioned that use of short segment posterior fusion with pedicle screw fixation is associated with a high rate of early failure of hardware and late loss of sagittal plane correction. In the literature, the best candidates for short segment fusion and instrumentation are young patients who need more mobility, have good general health and who can tolerate two stage procedures. In one report,no implant failed, the prevalence of pseudoarthrosis was not recorded, the sagittal index and compression percentage showed a slight loss, but the clinical outcome was not affected(3).

    Thank you.

    Yours sincerely,

    Dr. Rajkumar S Amaravati.

    References :

    1. Gertzbein SD: Spine update: Classification of thoracic and lumbar fractures. Spine. 1994; 79:626-628

    2. McCormack T, Karaikovic E, Gaines RW: The load sharing classification of spine fractures. Spine. 1994; 19:1741- 1744.

    3. Aligizakis AC, Kotonis PG, Sapkas G, Papgelopoulos PJ, Galanakis I, Hadjipavlou A : Gertzbein and Load Sharing Classifications for Unstable Thoracolumbar Fractures. Clin Orthop. 2003; 411:77-85.

    4. Ditunno Jr JF, Young W, Donovan WH, Creasey G: The international standard booklets for nuerological and functional classification of spinal cord injury: American Spinal Injury Association. Paraplegia. 1994; 32: 70- 80.

    Related Content
    The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
    JBJS Case Connector
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    JBJS Jobs
    12/04/2013
    New York - Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    12/31/2013
    S. Carolina - Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Medical Univerity of South Carlonina
    02/28/2014
    District of Columbia (DC) - Children's National Medical Center
    04/02/2014
    W. Virginia - Charleston Area Medical Center