Scientific Article   |    
Results of the Musculofascial Lengthening Technique for Submuscular Transposition of the Ulnar Nerve at the Elbow
A Lee Dellon, MD; J. Henk Coert, MD
View Disclosures and Other Information
Investigation performed at Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland

A. Lee Dellon, MD
Division of Plastic Surgery and Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Suite 370, 3333 North Calvert Street, Baltimore, MD 21218

J. Henk Coert, MD
Division of Plastic Surgery, Groningen University School of Medicine, Groningen, The Netherlands

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2003 Jul 01;85(7):1314-1320
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case


Background: In the absence of a randomized, prospective study comparing different surgical approaches for decompression of the ulnar nerve at the elbow, the choice of an approach relies on the individual surgeon's training and experience. The present report describes the results of a prospective, long-term evaluation of the musculofascial lengthening technique in a large series of patients. In these patients, the degree of ulnar nerve compression was staged with use of a numerical grading system that included measures of both motor and sensory function.

Methods: From 1985 through 1991, 121 consecutive patients (161 extremities) in whom the ulnar nerve was entrapped at the elbow were treated with surgical decompression with use of a musculofascial lengthening technique. In addition to the patient history and physical examination, measurements of sensory and motor function were obtained prospectively to permit staging of the severity of the compression by means of a grading scale. The preoperative and postoperative scores on this scale were evaluated. The mean duration of follow-up after surgery was 45.6 months.

Results: On the basis of traditional criteria, 105 limbs (65%) had an excellent result; thirty-seven (23%), a good result; six (4%), a fair result; twelve (7.5%), a failure; and one (0.5%), a recurrence. There was significant improvement in ulnar nerve function in terms of both the sensory (p < 0.001) and motor (p < 0.001) components of the grading scale. Comparisons of clinical subgroups revealed significant improvement in patients with diabetes, those with a Workers' Compensation claim, and those who had a severe degree of compression rather than a mild degree of compression.

Conclusion: Surgical decompression of ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow by means of a musculofascial lengthening technique was associated with an 88% rate of good to excellent results. The results of the present study demonstrate the feasibility of performing a statistical analysis of surgical results by using a numerical grading system to stage the degree of nerve compression. This method may be used to study different surgical techniques for the treatment of this common nerve compression syndrome.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level IV (case series [no, or historical, control group]). See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Figures in this Article
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $35
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org


    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe

    Related Content
    The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
    JBJS Case Connector
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    JBJS Jobs
    Massachusetts - Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine
    Virginia - OrthoVirginia
    NY - Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    WY - Memorial Hospital of Sweetwater County