0
Scientific Articles   |    
Operative Correction of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis in Male PatientsA Radiographic and Functional Outcome Comparison With Female Patients
Daniel J. Sucato, MD, MS1; Daniel Hedequist, MD2; Lori A. Karol, MD1
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas at Southwestern Medical Center, Texas Scottish Rite Hospital, 2222 Welborn Street, Dallas, TX 75230. E-mail address for D.J. Sucato: dan.sucato@tsrh.org
2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115
View Disclosures and Other Information
The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.
Investigation performed at Texas Scottish Rite Hospital, Dallas, Texas

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2004 Sep 01;86(9):2005-2014
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

Background: The outcomes following surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis have traditionally been assessed on the basis of radiographic parameters and, more recently, functional outcome measures. However, we know of no published studies in which radiographic and functional outcomes following surgery were compared between male and female patients.

Methods: Fifty-two male patients who had had surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were compared retrospectively with two groups of female patients: a random sample of 130 female patients who had had surgical treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis during the same time period and a subgroup of fifty-two of these female patients who had been matched to the male patients with regard to curve type and magnitude. Radiographic parameters were compared between the male and female patients, and the Scoliosis Research Society outcome questionnaire was used to compare functional results between the male patients and the matched female group.

Results: Compared with the random sample of female patients, the male patients were older at the time of presentation (average [and standard deviation], 13.9 ± 1.9 compared with 12.8 ± 1.4 years) and at the time of surgery (average, 15.9 ± 2.0 compared with 14.2 ± 1.4 years) (p < 0.05). The male and female patients presented with primary coronal curves of similar magnitudes (average, 48° ± 19° compared with 47° ± 13°), but the male patients had larger curves at the time of surgery (average, 62° ± 11° compared with 56° ± 10°) with greater coronal plane imbalance. Compared with the subset of female patients matched for curve type and magnitude, the male patients had, on average, a longer surgical time (263 ± 61 compared with 202 ± 40 minutes), greater intraoperative blood loss (1148 ± 660 compared with 944 ± 408 mL), and less curve correction in the coronal plane (from 62° ± 11° to 31° ± 11° compared with from 59° ± 10° to 23° ± 9°) (p < 0.05). The loss of coronal plane correction, the final coronal balance, all measured sagittal plane parameters, and the prevalence of complications were the same in these two groups. With regard to functional outcome, the scores were similar with the exception that the male patients had lower scores in the category of "function from back condition" when compared with the matched female patients (3.8 ± 0.2 compared with 4.3 ± 0.3 points) (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is identified at a later age in male patients than in female patients with similar curve types. The curve magnitudes in the male patients are greater at the time of surgery. When surgeons are planning operative correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in male patients, they should expect longer operative time, greater blood loss, and less coronal plane correction of the primary curve. However, balance in the coronal and sagittal planes should be achieved and complication rates and functional outcomes can be expected to be similar to those in female patients.

Level of Evidence: Prognostic study, Level II-1 (retrospective study). See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Figures in this Article
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $35
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

     
    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org

    References

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe





    Related Content
    The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
    JBJS Case Connector
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    JBJS Jobs
    12/31/2013
    S. Carolina - Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Medical Univerity of South Carlonina
    05/03/2012
    California - UCLA/OH Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
    03/05/2014
    Oklahoma - The University of Oklahoma
    11/15/2013
    Louisiana - Ochsner Health System