0
Scientific Articles   |    
Revision Arthroplasty with Use of a Total Femur Prosthesis
C. Friesecke, MD1; J. Plutat, MD1; A. Block1
1 Endo-Klinik, Holstenstrasse 2, 22767 Hamburg, Germany. E-mail address for C. Friesecke: christian.friesecke@endo.de
View Disclosures and Other Information
The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.
Investigation performed at the Endo-Klinik, Hamburg, Germany

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2005 Dec 01;87(12):2693-2701. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02770
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

Background: Surgeons performing revision arthroplasties of the hip and knee are confronted with a growing number of patients with extensive loss of bone stock. Implantation of a total femur prosthesis is a possible method of treatment of such patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the functional outcomes and the complications associated with total femur replacements used in revision arthroplasty.

Methods: We evaluated the results associated with 100 total femur prostheses that had been implanted during revision arthroplasty in 100 consecutive patients without infection. The mean duration of follow-up was five years. The prosthesis was implanted because of a complication of a total hip replacement in seventy-seven patients, because of a complication of a total knee replacement in four, and because of a complication affecting the diaphysis of the femur in nineteen. Thirty-nine patients had sustained a periprosthetic fracture, usually in combination with loosening of the prosthesis, before the revision. The radiographs made at the time of the latest follow-up were evaluated for signs of loosening and material failure. The preoperative and postoperative function of the hip and knee was assessed according to the Enneking score. Five patients were lost to follow-up.

Results: Sixty-five patients (68%) had no complications. Deep infection was found in twelve patients (13%); dislocation, in six (6%); material failure, in three (3%); patellar problems, in two (2%); and peroneal nerve palsy, in one (1%). The mean preoperative Enneking score for hip function was 1.25 points, and it improved to 3.29 points postoperatively. The mean Enneking score for knee function was 2.09 points preoperatively and 3.29 points postoperatively.

Conclusions: We believe that the total femur prosthesis is a useful implant for patients with extensive bone loss at revision arthroplasty. While the infection rate was high, the overall functional results for both the hip and the knee were rated as better than good with the Enneking classification.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Figures in this Article
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $35
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

     
    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org

    References

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe





    Related Content
    The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
    JBJS Case Connector
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    JBJS Jobs
    04/16/2014
    Ohio - OhioHealth Research and Innovation Institute (OHRI)
    01/22/2014
    Pennsylvania - Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
    04/23/2014
    Massachusetts - UMass Memorial Medical Center
    02/05/2014
    Oregon - The Center - Orthopedic and Neurosurgical Care and Research