The Orthopaedic Forum   |    
Operative Management of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in Elderly PatientsAn International Survey
Mohit Bhandari, MD, MSc1; P.J. Devereaux, MD1; Paul TornettaIII, MD2; Marc F. Swiontkowski, MD3; Daniel J. Berry, MD4; George Haidukewych, MD5; Emil H. Schemitsch, MD6; Beate P. Hanson, MD7; Kenneth Koval, MD8; Douglas Dirschl, MD9; Pamela Leece, BSc1; Marius Keel, MD10; Brad Petrisor, MD1; Martin Heetveld, MD11; Gordon H. Guyatt, MD, MSc1
1 Departments of Surgery and Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Hamilton Health Sciences-General Hospital, 237 Barton Street East, 7 North, Suite 727, Hamilton, ON L8L 2X2, Canada. E-mail address for M. Bhandari: bhandam@mcmaster.ca
2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston Medical Center, 818 Harrison Avenue, Dowling 2 North, Boston, MA 02118-2393
3 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, 2450 Riverside Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55454
4 Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street S.W., Rochester, MN 55905
5 Florida Orthopaedic Institute, 13020 North Telecom Parkway, Temple Terrace, FL 33637
6 St. Michael's Hospital, 55 Queen Street East, #800, Toronto, ON M5C 1R6, Canada
7 MPH AO Clinical Investigation and Doc, Clavadelerstrasse, 7270 Davos Platz, Switzerland
8 Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03756
9 Department of Orthopaedics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 3147 Bioinformatics, CB #7055, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7055
10 Division of Trauma Surgery, University of Zurich Hospital, Sternwartstrasse 14, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
11 Department of General Surgery—Trauma, Erasmus Medical Center, P.O. Box 2040, 300 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
View Disclosures and Other Information
The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2005 Sep 01;87(9):2122-2130. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00535
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case


Background: Hip fractures occur in 280,000 North Americans each year. Although surgeons have reached consensus with regard to the treatment of undisplaced fractures of the hip, the surgical treatment of displaced fractures remains controversial. Identifying surgeons' preferences in techniques, and the rationale for their choices, may aid in focusing educational activities to the orthopaedic community as well as planning future clinical trials. Our objective was to clarify current opinion with regard to the operative treatment of displaced fractures of the femoral neck.

Methods: We used a cross-sectional survey design and a sample-to-redundancy strategy to examine surgeons' preferences in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures. We mailed this survey to members of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association and European-AO International-affiliated trauma centers.

Results: Of 442 surgeons who received the questionnaire, 298 (67%) responded. The typical respondent was a North American man over the age of forty years who was in academic practice, supervised residents, had fellowship training in trauma, and worked in a low-volume center (<100 hip fractures per year), treating an equal proportion of displaced and undisplaced femoral neck fractures. Most surgeons believed that internal fixation was the procedure of choice in younger patients (those who are less than sixty years old) with a displaced fracture (Garden type III or IV). For patients over eighty years old with Garden type-III or IV fractures, almost all surgeons preferred arthroplasty. Respondents varied widely in their preferences for the treatment of patients who were sixty to eighty years old with a displaced fracture (Garden type III or IV) or active patients with a Garden type-III fracture. Many surgeons believed there was no difference between arthroplasty and internal fixation when considering mortality (45%), infection rates (30%), and quality of life (37%). Surgeons also revealed variable preferences in their choice of the optimal approach to arthroplasty for patients between sixty and eighty years old with a type-IV fracture (32% preferred unipolar; 41%, bipolar; and 17%, total hip arthroplasty) and in the optimal choice of implant for internal fixation.

Conclusions: While surgeons prefer internal fixation for younger patients and arthroplasty for older patients, they disagree about the optimal approach to the management of patients between sixty and eighty years old with a displaced fracture and active patients with a Garden type-III fracture. Surgeons also disagree on the optimal implants for internal fixation or arthroplasty.

Figures in this Article
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $35
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org


    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe

    Related Content
    The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
    JBJS Case Connector
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Results provided by:
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    JBJS Jobs
    Louisiana - Ochsner Health System
    Pennsylvania - Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center