0
Scientific Articles   |    
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in OctogenariansA Case-Control Study
Javad Parvizi, MD, FRCS1; Aidin Eslam Pour, MD1; Nahid R. Keshavarzi, MSc1; Michele D'Apuzzo, MD1; Peter F. Sharkey, MD1; William J. Hozack, MD1
1 Rothman Institute, 925 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107. E-mail address for J. Parvizi: Parvj@aol.com
View Disclosures and Other Information
Disclosure: In support of their research for or preparation of this manuscript, one or more of the authors received, in any one year, outside funding or grants in excess of $10,000 from Stryker. Neither they nor a member of their immediate families received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center, clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors, or a member of their immediate families, are affiliated or associated.
Investigation performed at the Rothman Institute of Orthopedics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2007 Dec 01;89(12):2612-2618. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00881
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

Background: Revision total hip arthroplasty in the very elderly is believed to be associated with a high complication rate. We evaluated the early outcomes and prevalence of complications following revision total hip arthroplasty in patients older than eighty years of age and compared them with those in a younger patient population.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the results of 170 revision total hip arthroplasties that had been performed in 159 octogenarians in our institute between 1992 and 1999. The mean patient age at the time of surgery was 83.8 years, and the mean follow-up time was 6.8 years. We then compared these results with those of 170 revision total hip arthroplasties, done with the same surgical technique and prosthesis, in 162 patients who were seventy years old or younger and followed for a mean of six years. The functional outcome and the quality of life following the arthroplasties were assessed with use of the Harris hip score and the Short Form-36 (SF-36), respectively. Risk factors for complications and mortality were identified, and Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine survivorship.

Results: The octogenarians had a significant improvement in the mean Harris hip score, from 47 points preoperatively to 85 points at the time of the latest follow-up. In the control group, the Harris hip score also improved significantly, from a preoperative mean of 44.3 points to a mean of 87.9 points at the time of the latest follow-up. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the magnitude of improvement of the Harris hip score. There were 100 deaths (a rate of 58.8%) at a mean of 5.3 years postoperatively in the octogenarian group compared with twelve deaths (7.1%) in the control group (p < 0.0001). There were no intraoperative deaths in either group. Of the 100 octogenarian patients who died, 94% had a well-functioning hip at the time of death. Perioperative medical complications developed in thirty patients (thirty-eight hips [22.4%]) in the octogenarian group and in twenty-five patients (twenty-six hips [15.3%]) in the control group (p > 0.05). There were thirteen repeat revisions and four other types of reoperations in the octogenarian group and twenty-three repeat revisions and six other types of reoperations in the control group (p = 0.08). A dislocation was sustained by four patients in the octogenarian group and sixteen patients in the control group (p = 0.01).

Conclusions: Revision total hip arthroplasty can provide substantial clinical benefit to patients over eighty years of age. The medical complication rate for octogenarians may not differ significantly from that for patients seventy years of age or younger, and the prevalence of technical complications and dislocations can be expected to be lower than that for younger patients.

Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Figures in this Article
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $35
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

     
    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org

    References

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe





    Related Content
    The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
    JBJS Case Connector
    Topic Collections
    Hip
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Guidelines
    Results provided by:
    PubMed
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    JBJS Jobs
    11/15/2013
    Louisiana - Ochsner Health System
    04/16/2014
    Ohio - OhioHealth Research and Innovation Institute (OHRI)