0
Scientific Exhibits   |    
The Influence of Contemporary Knee Design on High Flexion: A Kinematic Comparison with the Normal Knee
Edward A. Morra, MSME1; Mircea Rosca, MSME1; Jonathan F.I. Greenwald, MFA1; A. Seth Greenwald, DPhil(Oxon)1
1 Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, Lutheran Hospital, 1730 West 25th Street, Cleveland, OH 44113. E-mail address: info@orl-inc.com
View Disclosures and Other Information
Disclosure: In support of the research for or preparation of this work, the laboratory at which the authors work received, in any one year, equal grants in excess of $10,000 from Finsbury, Biomet, and Smith and Nephew. Neither they nor a member of their immediate families received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center, clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors, or a member of their immediate families, are affiliated or associated.
Note: The authors acknowledge the efforts of Melinda Harman, PhD, and Scott A. Banks, PhD, for their contribution of validation data to this project; they also thank Bernard N. Stulberg, MD, Peter J. Brooks, MD, FRCS(C), and Adolph V. Lombardi Jr., MD, for their virtual surgical reviews and clinical insights.

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2008 Nov 01;90(Supplement 4):195-201. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00817
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Extract

Although >90% of total knee arthroplasties are associated with a good-to-excellent outcome, some patients have difficulty adjusting their gait to accommodate the new articulations inherent in contemporary implant designs. Paradoxical motions inclusive of anterior sliding and lateral pivot are examples of aberrant kinematics in total knee arthroplasty. A computational kinematic simulator measured the motion attained by six contemporary total knee arthroplasty designs. Results were compared with the in vivo kinematic data from healthy knees (i.e., knees with no history of surgery) in deep flexion1. Three designs employing a tibial post and a femoral cam as the motion control mechanism were evaluated, including the Legacy LPS-Flex Fixed Bearing (Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana), the Journey (Smith and Nephew, Memphis, Tennessee), and the Vanguard PS (Biomet, Warsaw, Indiana). Three designs that did not employ a tibial post and femoral cam mechanism were also evaluated, including the MRK (Finsbury, Leatherhead, United Kingdom), the Duracon (Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, New Jersey), and the Triathlon (Stryker Orthopaedics). All six designs have a fixed plateau and are currently available for clinical use in the United States.
Figures in this Article

    First Page Preview

    View Large
    />
    First page PDF preview
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $35
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

     
    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org

    References

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe





    Related Content
    The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
    JBJS Case Connector
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    JBJS Jobs
    01/22/2014
    Pennsylvania - Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
    04/16/2014
    Ohio - OhioHealth Research and Innovation Institute (OHRI)
    03/19/2014
    Virginia - VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER