0
Surgical Techniques   |    
Transosseous Suture Fixation of Proximal Humeral FracturesSurgical Technique
Panayiotis Dimakopoulos, MD1; Andreas Panagopoulos, MD1; Georgios Kasimatis, MD1
1 Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Orthopaedic Department, University Hospital of Patras, Papanikolaou Street, Rio-Patras 26504, Greece. E-mail address for P. Dimakopoulos: pa.dimakopoulos@gmail.com. E-mail address for A. Panagopoulos: andpan21@gmail.com. Email address for G. Kasimatis: g.kasimatis@gmail.com
View Disclosures and Other Information
The original scientific article in which the surgical technique was presented was published in JBJS Vol. 89-A, pp. 1700-9, August 2007
DISCLOSURE: The authors did not receive any outside funding or grants in support of their research for or preparation of this work. Neither they nor a member of their immediate families received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center, clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors, or a member of their immediate families, are affiliated or associated.
A video supplement to this article has been produced by the Video Journal of Orthopaedics (VJO). This production is included on the bound-in DVD as part of this issue and will also be available in streaming video format at the JBJS website, . VJO can be contacted at (805) 962-3410, web site: .
The line drawings in this article are the work of Joanne Haderer Müller of Haderer & Müller (biomedart@haderermuller.com).
Investigation performed at the Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Orthopaedic Department, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2009 Mar 01;91(Supplement 2 Part 1):8-21. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01290
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment of displaced fractures of the proximal part of the humerus remains controversial. We evaluated the long-term functional and radiographic results of transosseous suture fixation in a series of selected displaced fractures of the proximal part of the humerus.

METHODS: Over an eleven-year period, a consecutive series of 188 patients with a specifically defined displaced fracture of the proximal part of the humerus underwent open reduction and internal fixation with transosseous sutures. Twenty patients were lost to follow-up and three died before the time of follow-up, leaving a cohort of 165 patients (ninety-four women and seventy-one men; mean age, fifty-four years) available for the study. Forty-five (27%) of the injuries were four-part fractures with valgus impaction; sixty-four (39%) were three-part fractures; and fifty-six (34%) were two-part fractures of the greater tuberosity, thirty-six (64%) of which were associated with anterior dislocation of the shoulder. All fractures were fixed with transosseous, nonabsorbable, number-5 Ethibond sutures. Associated rotator cuff tears detected in fifty-seven patients (35%) were also repaired. Over a mean follow-up period of 5.4 years, functional outcome was assessed with the Constant score. Follow-up radiographs were assessed for fracture consolidation, malunion, nonunion, heterotopic ossification, and signs of impingement, humeral head osteonecrosis, and degenerative osteoarthritis.

RESULTS: All fractures, except for two three-part fractures of the greater tuberosity, united within four months. The quality of fracture reduction as seen on the first postoperative radiograph was regarded as excellent/very good in 155 patients (94%), good in seven (4%), and poor in three (2%). Malunion was present in nine patients (5%) at the time of the last follow-up; six of the nine had had good or poor initial reduction and three, excellent/very good reduction. Humeral head osteonecrosis was seen in eleven (7%) of the 165 patients; four demonstrated total and seven, partial collapse. Fifteen patients had heterotopic ossification, but none had functional impairment. Four patients had signs of impingement syndrome, and two had arthritis. At the time of the final evaluation, the mean Constant score was 91 points, and the mean Constant score as a percentage of the score for the unaffected shoulder, unadjusted for age and gender, was 94%.

CONCLUSIONS: The clinical and radiographic results of this transosseous suture technique were found to be satisfactory at an average of 5.4 years postoperatively. Advantages of this technique include less surgical soft-tissue dissection, a low rate of humeral head osteonecrosis, fixation sufficient to allow early passive joint motion, and the avoidance of bulky and expensive implants.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Figures in this Article
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $35
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

     
    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org

    References

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Panayiotis Dimakopoulos, MD
    Posted on April 16, 2009
    Dr. Dimakopoulos and colleagues respond to Dr. Abboud
    Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Orthopaedic Department, University Hospital of Patras, Greece

    We thank Dr. Abboud for his interest in our article and we appreciate the opportunity to clarify certain points regarding the, “Transosseous Suturing Fixation” technique.

    No fluoroscopic imaging is needed with this technique since it is an open one, allowing for a very good view of the operating field. We would point out that with the ability to rotate the arm in both external and internal rotation, introperative visualization of the fracture fragments is easily obtained both anteriorly and posteriorly. We have not found it necessary to use fluoroscopy intraoperatively with this technique.

    Plates are a reasonable alternative for proximal humeral fractures but they do have disadvantages. We used proximal humeral plates extensively in the past but, in many instances, the fixation was unstable, especially in 3- and 4-part valgus impacted fractures. Although precontoured proximal humeral plates permit better bony purchase and more stable fixation, they do not allow for as good a tensioning of the tuberosities as provided by the sutures themselves. At present, our current indication for plate osteosynthesis is the 2-part fracture of the surgical neck, using a plate which also enables the placement of sutures for even better stabilization.

    The concept of non-anatomic fracture reduction obviates many of the main disadvantages of earlier techniques. Screw purchase is not always possible in the exact place that it was initially planned, hardware and tuberosities may impinge and the final function of the rotator cuff muscles is occasionally compromised. Figure 11 is the postoperative radiograph of a 4-part valgus impacted fracture fixed by the “Transosseous Suturing” technique. In this type of fracture, we accept a non-anatomic reduction in order to avoid disimpaction of the head part from its valgus impacted status, thus minimizing the risk of further disruption of the vulnerable blood supply to the head. In order to restore the mechanics of the rotator cuff, we pull and fix the tuberosities below the top of the head, producing a non-anatomic, yet functional situation (as shown in Figure 8). Overall, what matters most is to provide a stable osteosynthesis with adequate tensioning of the rotator cuff, without impingement.

    Joseph A. Abboud, MD
    Posted on April 05, 2009
    Transosseous Suture Fixation Technique For Proximal Humerus Fractures
    3B Orthopaedics, University of Pennsylvania Health System, PA

    To the Editor:

    I read with interest the paper by Dimakopoulos et al. (1) and would like to pose the following questions to the authors:

    1. To what extent do they use fluoroscopic imaging intraoperatively?

    2. Have they had any problems using plates, particularly the precontoured proximal humeral locking plates, with this technique?

    3. Could they comment further on the importance of anatomic fracture reduction? When are they willing to accept a non-anatomic reduction such as they show in figure 11?

    The author did not receive any outside funding or grants in support of his research for or preparation of this work. Neither he nor a member of his immediate family received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center, clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the author, or a member of his immediate family, is affiliated or associated.

    Reference

    1. Dimakopoulos P, Panagopoulos A, Kasimatis G. Transosseous suture fixation of proximal humeral fractures. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91 Suppl 2 Pt 1:8-21.

    The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
    JBJS Case Connector
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Arthroscopic management of proximal humerus malunion with tuberoplasty and rotator cuff retensioning.
    Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association: Issue date- 2012 Sep
    Total shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of failed hemiarthroplasty in patients with fracture of the proximal humerus.
    Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery / American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons ... [et al.]: Issue date- 2012 Nov
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    01/02/2013
    Pennsylvania - The Orthopaedic & Rehabilitation Institute at Allegheny General Hospital
    02/04/2013
    Michigan - Wayne State University School of Medicine
    04/17/2013
    Connecticut - Yale University School of Medicine