Scientific Article   |    
In Vivo Deterioration of Tibial Baseplate Locking Mechanisms in Contemporary Modular Total Knee Components
Gerard A. Engh, MD; Smain Lounici, MS; Anand R. Rao, BS; Matthew B. Collier, MS
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2001 Nov 01;83(11):1660-1665
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case


Background: The results of recent studies documenting the backside wear of polyethylene inserts retrieved from total knee implants call into question the stability of the locking mechanisms of modular tibial components. Wear of the metal tibial baseplate suggests that the capture mechanisms of some modular fixed-bearing tibial components do not adequately restrict in vivo motion of the insert. The purposes of this study were (1) to present a method for evaluating locking-mechanism stability and (2) to investigate the stability of modular tibial components after an interval in vivo.

Methods: We measured the anteroposterior and mediolateral motion between the polyethylene insert and the tibial tray in a variety of modular total knee tibial components. A uniaxial mechanical testing machine was used to evaluate the stability of ten unimplanted components (control group), fifteen implants obtained from patients who were undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty (revision group), and fifteen devices retrieved post mortem (autopsy group). We applied loads along the anteroposterior and mediolateral axes of the tibial component and recorded the maximum insert displacement that occurred. From this value, we calculated an insert-motion index, the magnitude of a two-dimensional vector that represented the total motion in the transverse plane.

Results: For the control group, the mean insert-motion index was 64 ± 13 m (range, 6 to 157 m); for the revision group, it was 341 ± 51 m (range, 104 to 718 m); and for the autopsy group, it was 380 ± 45 m (range, 122 to 657 m). The insert-motion index for the control group was significantly lower than that for the revision group (p = 0.001) or autopsy group (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Motion between the polyethylene insert and the metal baseplate in contemporary modular tibial designs increases after a period of in vivo loading.

Clinical Relevance: Although there are several advantages to the use of modular tibial components, these ad-vantages must be weighed against the disadvantage of backside wear debris secondary to motion of the modular insert. Debris from backside wear combined with wear from the articular side might account for the increasing prevalence of osteolysis since modular components have become widely used.

Figures in this Article
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $35
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org


    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe

    Related Content
    The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
    JBJS Case Connector
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    JBJS Jobs
    Pennsylvania - Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
    Ohio - OhioHealth Research and Innovation Institute (OHRI)
    Oregon - The Center - Orthopedic and Neurosurgical Care and Research