0
Scientific Articles   |    
Intraobserver and Interobserver Agreement in the Measurement of Displaced Humeral Medial Epicondyle Fractures in Children
Nick Pappas, MD1; John T. Lawrence, MD2; Derek Donegan, MD2; Ted Ganley, MD2; John M. Flynn, MD2
1 201 South 25th Street, Apartment 412, Philadelphia, PA 19103. E-mail address: nick.pappas@uphs.upenn.edu
2 University of Pennsylvania, 34th Street and Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104
View Disclosures and Other Information
Disclosure: The authors did not receive any outside funding or grants in support of their research for or preparation of this work. One or more of the authors, or a member of his or her immediate family, received, in any one year, payments or other benefits of less than $10,000 or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from commercial entities (Biomet Trauma and Medtronic Spinal and Biologics).

A commentary by Michelle S. Caird, MD, is available at www.jbjs.org/commentary and as supplemental material to the online version of this article.
Investigation performed at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Copyright ©2010 American Society for Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2010 Feb 01;92(2):322-327. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00493
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

Background: 

Fractures of the humeral medial epicondyle occur frequently in children. The decision to pursue operative or nonoperative treatment often hinges on the amount of perceived fracture displacement. This study was performed to assess both intraobserver and interobserver agreement in the measurements of displacement of these fractures on radiographs by orthopaedic surgeons with various levels of training.

Methods: 

We performed a retrospective review of the radiographs of thirty-eight patients with a fracture of the medial epicondyle of the humerus. Digital anteroposterior, lateral, and oblique radiographs of each involved elbow made at presentation were presented to five separate reviewers with different levels of orthopaedic training, including two junior residents (junior residents 1 and 2), one fellow, one junior attending surgeon, and one senior attending surgeon. Each reviewer recorded the amount of perceived displacement in millimeters. A difference of >2 mm between measurements represented clinical disagreement between reviewers. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement was assessed by calculating both the intraclass correlation coefficient and the percentage of clinical disagreement between ratings.

Results: 

The intraclass correlation coefficients for intraobserver agreement regarding the measurements on the anteroposterior radiographs were 0.24 (95% confidence interval, 0.00 to 0.68) for junior resident 1, 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.41 to 0.95) for junior resident 2, 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.46 to 0.96) for the senior attending surgeon, 0.92 (95% confidence interval, 0.69 to 0.98) for the junior attending surgeon, and 0.98 (95% confidence interval, 0.92 to 1.00) for the fellow. The combined intraclass correlation coefficient for intraobserver agreement was 0.76. The reviewers as a group disagreed with their own measurements an average of 26% of the time. The intraclass correlation coefficient for interobserver reliability with regard to the measurements on the anteroposterior radiographs for the group was 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.64 to 0.89), and the reviewers disagreed with each other an average of 54% of the time. The intraclass correlation coefficient for interobserver agreement was 0.28 (95% confidence interval, 0.03 to 0.76) for the measurements on the lateral radiographs and 0.62 (95% confidence interval, 0.34 to 0.89) for the measurements on the oblique radiographs, with reviewers disagreeing an average of 87% of the time with regard to the measurements on the lateral radiographs and 64% of the time with regard to the measurements on the oblique radiographs.

Conclusions: 

Intraobserver agreement with regard to measurement of displacement of medial epicondyle fractures of the humerus varied among the reviewers but was low overall. Interobserver agreement was best for the measurements on the anteroposterior radiographs, but this was also low overall. These findings cast doubt on whether the amount of perceived displacement should be used as a criterion for choosing operative or nonoperative management of fractures of the humeral medial epicondyle. Agreement may be improved to acceptable levels by adopting a standard set of measurement guidelines, which include use of the anteroposterior radiograph when possible and consistently measuring at the point of maximal displacement.

Figures in this Article

    Topics

    fracture ; humerus
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $35
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

     
    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org

    References

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe





    Related Content
    The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
    JBJS Case Connector
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    JBJS Jobs
    03/17/2014
    Connecticut - Orthopaedic Foundation
    03/27/2014
    MA - Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine
    01/22/2014
    PA - Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center