The use of modularity in femoral stem designs for total hip arthroplasty has increased substantially over the past several years. The theoretical advantages of this design include the optimization of femoral anteversion, limb length, and offset of the femoral component. We report on a previously unreported fracture of a modular femoral neck device.
The patient was informed that data concerning the case would be submitted for publication, and he consented.
A forty-nine-year-old man underwent a primary total hip arthroplasty of the left hip, in June 2005, because of degenerative osteoarthritis and received a size-4 PROFEMUR Z femoral stem (Wright Medical Technology, Arlington, Tennessee) and a 64-mm CONSERVE acetabular component (Wright Medical Technology). The patient was 6 ft 6 in (198 cm) tall and weighed 340 lb (154.2 kg). An anterolateral surgical approach was utilized, and the bearing surface chosen was metal on metal. This proximal femoral cementless component is a dual-tapered rectangular stem that has a modular neck. The modular neck has an oval taper distally that is inserted into the femoral stem at a fixed angle. This allows the surgeon to independently adjust the offset and length as it is available in six different neck geometries and two lengths. Five different head options, ranging from —3.5 mm to +10.5 mm, are also available with this design. The head and neck are connected by means of a standard 12/14 Morse taper. Both the femoral stem and the modular neck are manufactured from a titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V). The patient had a 56-mm head with a —3.5-mm neck length. The neck geometry was a long varus anteverted neck (AR/VV2). The patient was otherwise healthy. The postoperative course was uneventful, and he was pain-free within three months after the procedure.
In January 2009 (four years postoperatively), the patient slipped on ice and fell directly onto the left hip. Following the fall, he reported no pain or discomfort but noticed a new onset of clicking and squeaking coming from the hip. Approximately two months later, three days before presentation to our office, he leaned over to tie his shoes, heard a snap, and was unable to bear weight on the left lower extremity. Radiographs made at that time demonstrated well-fixed acetabular and femoral components with a fracture of the modular neck (Fig. 1). The femoral head remained well fixed to the proximal fragment of the modular neck, while the distal fragment of the modular neck remained seated in the bore of the femoral stem.
He was referred to our institution, where he underwent a revision total hip arthroplasty. Preoperative laboratory testing was not suggestive of an infection, with an erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 23 mm/hr (normal, 0 to 9 mm/hr) and a C-reactive protein level of 2.3 mg/L (normal, 0 to 1.0 mg/L). No metal ion serum levels were obtained. A posterior approach was used to expose the hip. Intraoperative cell count and frozen-section results showed no signs of infection. The modular neck was confirmed to be fractured near the neck-stem junction. The head and proximal aspect of the neck were removed from the wound. It was not possible to independently remove the distal aspect of the femoral neck from the stem; therefore, the stem extractor could not be used (Fig. 2). An extended trochanteric osteotomy was performed, and the femoral stem and fractured distal fragment of the modular neck were removed en bloc. The acetabular cup was removed with the explant device because of incompatibility between the acetabular component and the new femoral head. The hip was reconstructed with a 66-mm modular trabecular metal cup (Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana) and 6-in (15.2-cm) VerSys FullCoat stem (Zimmer) with a 40-mm head. The extended trochanteric osteotomy was repaired with cables. Cultures at the time of surgery showed no growth.
Examination of the distal fragment of the modular neck with use of light microscopy showed marked fretting and corrosion damage and black fretting with corrosion debris (Fig. 3). The damage was concentrated on the lateral and anterior surfaces where they had mated with the stem. Scanning electron microscopy revealed severe corrosion, consisting of scalloping and pitting of the mating surfaces (Fig. 4). The fracture surface demonstrated a clear clamshell pattern characteristic of a fatigue fracture radiating from the corroded area on the anterolateral surface of the modular neck. Neither fretting nor corrosion damage was evident at the modular head-neck junction.
Modular hip systems have gained popularity as they offer the surgeon the potential to restore normal hip biomechanics with the ability to independently adjust offset, version, and limb length. However, there are concerns that with any metal-on-metal modular junction, there is the potential for fretting corrosion and concomitant metal ion release.
Fracture of femoral components is a rare complication in total hip arthroplasty. Prior to the introduction of forged cobalt-chromium molybdenum and titanium alloys, Charnley estimated the stem fracture prevalence to be 0.23%1, while other designs may have been as high as 11%2. Fractures of the neck of the femoral stem have been reported. Factors contributing to fracture include defects in welding of the neck to the prosthesis3, heavy laser etching in the region4, and crevice corrosion associated with the head-neck junction5,6.
In vitro studies of femoral components with neck-stem modularity have shown that corrosion and fretting can occur at the neck-stem junction and that this occurs primarily at the medial contact point between the neck and stem7,8.
Retrieval studies by Kop and Swarts9 showed that corrosion and fretting occur at both the head-neck and the neck-stem modular junctions. Longer implantation times increase the amount of corrosion and fretting. They also reported that the degradation of the neck-stem junction was more significant than at the head-neck junction and was believed to be secondary to the increased lever arm and high mechanical stress. Inflammatory mediators are released as a consequence of the cellular response to the particulate and/or ionic products of fretting and corrosion. This can ultimately result in the need to revise the prosthesis10,11.
Recently, Varini et al. reported that stem impactors that secure the femoral stem by means of the neck-stem junction induce some damage to the bore of the femoral stem. They hypothesized that this may trigger increased fretting damage resulting in the production of debris12. It is not known whether this type of impactor was used in the index procedure in this patient. An alternative impactor that does not engage the neck-stem junction is available for insertion of the femoral stem.
Case reports of dissociation of modular hip stem prosthesis have been published13-15, and there is one case of a patient who had dissociation of the Alpha II (Osteoimplant Technology, Hunt Valley, Maryland) fully porous-coated stem16. The difference between the Alpha II and the implant used in our patient is that the neck-stem junction is much deeper in the implant in the present report. This stem also has demonstrated excellent success, with clinical results at ten years showing no complications with fracture of the modular necks17-19.
This implant had a long varus modular neck. The lever arm, combined with the height and weight of the patient, probably resulted in increased stresses at the neck-stem modular junction. While it is impossible to be certain, we believe that the body habitus of the patient along with the long varus neck contributed to the finding of substantial fretting and corrosion, and subsequent neck fracture.