Background: Alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings have gained popularity in hip arthroplasty because of their properties of low wear and chemical inertness. In a previous study, we reported the excellent clinical results in a series of cementless ceramic-on-ceramic primary total hip arthroplasties at a minimum of five years of follow-up. The purpose of the present study was to determine the results in the same patient cohort at a minimum of ten years of follow-up.
Methods: A series of 301 consecutive primary cementless total hip arthroplasties was assessed clinically and radiographically. Clinical information was available for 244 hips in 227 surviving patients at a minimum of ten years of follow-up, and radiographic information was available for 184 hips in 172 patients.
Results: Twenty-six (9.2%) of the patients had died of an unrelated cause and eight (2.7%) had undergone revision arthroplasty by the time of the latest follow-up. The average Harris hip score was 94 points, with 95% (232) of the patients having an excellent or good result and <4% (nine) having moderate residual pain. All radiographic assessments showed evidence of stable osseous ingrowth. Nine revisions had been performed, including four femoral component revisions due to periprosthetic fracture, one femoral revision due to aseptic loosening, one femoral revision secondary to a femoral shortening osteotomy for nerve palsy, two acetabular cup revisions due to psoas tendinitis, and a repeat revision in one of the patients with psoas tendinitis due to acetabular osteolysis. The overall survival rate of the implants was 98% (95% confidence interval, 94.2% to 99.6%) at ten years with revision for any reason as the end point.
Conclusions: The patients in our series had a good implant survival rate, good function, a low implant wear rate as reported in the previous study, and no further radiographic evidence of failure at ten years after cementless primary total hip arthroplasty with alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Investigation performed at the Specialist Orthopaedic Group, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Disclosure: None of the authors received payments or services, either directly or indirectly (i.e., via his or her institution), from a third party in support of any aspect of this work. One or more of the authors, or his or her institution, has had a financial relationship, in the thirty-six months prior to submission of this work, with an entity in the biomedical arena that could be perceived to influence or have the potential to influence what is written in this work. No author has had any other relationships, or has engaged in any other activities, that could be perceived to influence or have the potential to influence what is written in this work. The complete Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest submitted by authors are always provided with the online version of the article.
- Copyright © 2012 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated
Enter your JBJS login information below.
Please note that your username is the email address you provided when you registered.