RT Journal A1 Nelissen, Rob G.H.H. A1 Pijls, Bart G. A1 Kärrholm, Johan A1 Malchau, Henrik A1 Nieuwenhuijse, Marc J. A1 Valstar, Edward R. T1 RSA and Registries: The Quest for Phased Introduction of New Implants JF The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery JO The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery YR 2011 FD December 21 VO 93 IS Supplement_3 SP 62 OP 65 DO 10.2106/JBJS.K.00907 UL http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.00907 AB Introduction:  Although the overall survival of knee and hip prostheses at ten years averages 90%, recent problems with several hip and knee prostheses have illustrated that the orthopaedic community, industry, and regulators can still further improve patient safety. Given the early predictive properties of roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) and the meticulous follow-up of national joint registries, these two methods are ideal tools for such a phased clinical introduction. In this paper, we elaborate on the predictive power of RSA within a two-year follow-up after arthroplasty and its relationship to national joint registries. The association between RSA prosthesis-migration data and registry data is evaluated.Methods:  The five-year rate of revision of RSA-tested total knee replacements was compared with that of non-RSA-tested total knee replacements. Data were extracted from the published results of the national joint registries of Sweden, Australia, and New Zealand.Results:  There was a 22% to 35% reduction in the number of revisions of RSA-tested total knee replacements as compared with non-RSA-tested total knee replacements in the national joint registries. Assuming that the total cost of total knee arthroplasty is $37,000 in the United States, a 22% to 35% reduction in the number of revisions (currently close to 55,000 annually) could lead to an estimated annual savings of over $400 million to the health-care system.Conclusion:  The phased clinical introduction of new prostheses with two-year RSA results as a qualitative tool could lead to better patient care and could reduce the costs associated with revision total knee arthroplasty. Follow-up in registries is necessary to substantiate these results and to improve post-market surveillance.