Investigation performed at Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
Copyright & License
Copyright © 2024 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.
Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest
Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSREV/B59).
Authors
Author
Author
Author
Author
Author
Author
Author
Author
1Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
3Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica imás12, CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III), Madrid, Spain
4Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands
5Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Martini Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands
6Joint Reconstruction Unit, Department of Orthopaedics, Southland Hospital, Invercargill, New Zealand
What Is the Most Effective Treatment for Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Joint Arthroplasty in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis?
A Systematic Review
Abstract
Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a risk factor for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review comparing the failure rates of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR), one-stage exchange arthroplasty/revision (OSR), and 2-stage exchange arthroplasty/revision (TSR) for RA patients with PJI and identify risk factors in the RA population associated with increased treatment failure rate.
Methods: PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Ovid Embase databases were screened with the terms “rheumatoid arthritis,” “total joint arthroplasty,” “prosthetic joint infection,” and “treatment for PJI” on August 29, 2021. Four hundred ninety-one studies were screened, of which 86 were evaluated. The primary outcome evaluated was failure of surgical treatment for PJI.
Results: Ten retrospective cohort studies were included after full-text screening, yielding 401 patients with RA. Additional demographic and PJI management data were obtained for 149 patients. Patients with RA who underwent TSR demonstrated a lower failure rate (26.8%) than both DAIR (60.1%) and OSR (39.2%) (χ2 = 37.463, p < 0.00001). Patients with RA who underwent DAIR had a 2.27 (95% CI, 1.66-3.10) times higher risk of experiencing treatment failure than those who underwent TSR. Among risk factors, there was a significant difference in the C-reactive protein of patients who did vs. did not experience treatment failure (p = 0.02).
Conclusion: TSR has a higher rate of success in the management of PJI patients with RA compared with DAIR and OSR. The complete removal of the infected prosthesis and delayed reimplantation may lower the treatment failure rate.
Level of Evidence: Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.